Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond
The pervasive shock response spectrum (SRS) and damage boundary methods for evaluating product fragility and designing external cushioning for shock protection are described in detail with references to the best available literature. Underlying assumptions are carefully reviewed and the central mess...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
1997-01-01
|
Series: | Shock and Vibration |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SAV-1997-4304 |
id |
doaj-b7700eae746e4d7e8ca74ac0f324068b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b7700eae746e4d7e8ca74ac0f324068b2020-11-24T23:29:53ZengHindawi LimitedShock and Vibration1070-96221875-92031997-01-014316919110.3233/SAV-1997-4304Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and BeyondSuresh Goyal0Jim M. Papadopoulos1Paul A. Sullivan2Wireless Research Laboratory, Lucent Technologies, Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Avenue, Rm. 1B-212, Murray Hill, NJ 07974, USARexnord Technical Services, 5101 West Beloit Road, West Milwaukee, WI 53214, USAWireless Research Laboratory, Lucent Technologies, Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Avenue, Rm. 1C-326, Murray Hill, NJ 07974, USAThe pervasive shock response spectrum (SRS) and damage boundary methods for evaluating product fragility and designing external cushioning for shock protection are described in detail with references to the best available literature. Underlying assumptions are carefully reviewed and the central message of the SRS is highlighted, particularly as it relates to standardized drop testing. Shortcomings of these methods are discussed, and the results are extended to apply to more general systems. Finally some general packaging and shock-mounting strategies are discussed in the context of protecting a fragile disk drive in a notebook computer, although the conclusions apply to other products as well. For example, exterior only cushioning (with low restitution to reduce subsequent impacts) will provide a slenderer form factor than the next best strategy: interior cushioning with a “dead” hard outer shell.http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SAV-1997-4304 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Suresh Goyal Jim M. Papadopoulos Paul A. Sullivan |
spellingShingle |
Suresh Goyal Jim M. Papadopoulos Paul A. Sullivan Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond Shock and Vibration |
author_facet |
Suresh Goyal Jim M. Papadopoulos Paul A. Sullivan |
author_sort |
Suresh Goyal |
title |
Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond |
title_short |
Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond |
title_full |
Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond |
title_fullStr |
Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond |
title_full_unstemmed |
Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond |
title_sort |
shock protection of portable electronic products: shock response spectrum, damage boundary approach, and beyond |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Shock and Vibration |
issn |
1070-9622 1875-9203 |
publishDate |
1997-01-01 |
description |
The pervasive shock response spectrum (SRS) and damage boundary methods for evaluating product fragility and designing external cushioning for shock protection are described in detail with references to the best available literature. Underlying assumptions are carefully reviewed and the central message of the SRS is highlighted, particularly as it relates to standardized drop testing. Shortcomings of these methods are discussed, and the results are extended to apply to more general systems. Finally some general packaging and shock-mounting strategies are discussed in the context of protecting a fragile disk drive in a notebook computer, although the conclusions apply to other products as well. For example, exterior only cushioning (with low restitution to reduce subsequent impacts) will provide a slenderer form factor than the next best strategy: interior cushioning with a “dead” hard outer shell. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SAV-1997-4304 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sureshgoyal shockprotectionofportableelectronicproductsshockresponsespectrumdamageboundaryapproachandbeyond AT jimmpapadopoulos shockprotectionofportableelectronicproductsshockresponsespectrumdamageboundaryapproachandbeyond AT paulasullivan shockprotectionofportableelectronicproductsshockresponsespectrumdamageboundaryapproachandbeyond |
_version_ |
1725543892284080128 |