Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond

The pervasive shock response spectrum (SRS) and damage boundary methods for evaluating product fragility and designing external cushioning for shock protection are described in detail with references to the best available literature. Underlying assumptions are carefully reviewed and the central mess...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suresh Goyal, Jim M. Papadopoulos, Paul A. Sullivan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 1997-01-01
Series:Shock and Vibration
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SAV-1997-4304
id doaj-b7700eae746e4d7e8ca74ac0f324068b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b7700eae746e4d7e8ca74ac0f324068b2020-11-24T23:29:53ZengHindawi LimitedShock and Vibration1070-96221875-92031997-01-014316919110.3233/SAV-1997-4304Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and BeyondSuresh Goyal0Jim M. Papadopoulos1Paul A. Sullivan2Wireless Research Laboratory, Lucent Technologies, Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Avenue, Rm. 1B-212, Murray Hill, NJ 07974, USARexnord Technical Services, 5101 West Beloit Road, West Milwaukee, WI 53214, USAWireless Research Laboratory, Lucent Technologies, Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Avenue, Rm. 1C-326, Murray Hill, NJ 07974, USAThe pervasive shock response spectrum (SRS) and damage boundary methods for evaluating product fragility and designing external cushioning for shock protection are described in detail with references to the best available literature. Underlying assumptions are carefully reviewed and the central message of the SRS is highlighted, particularly as it relates to standardized drop testing. Shortcomings of these methods are discussed, and the results are extended to apply to more general systems. Finally some general packaging and shock-mounting strategies are discussed in the context of protecting a fragile disk drive in a notebook computer, although the conclusions apply to other products as well. For example, exterior only cushioning (with low restitution to reduce subsequent impacts) will provide a slenderer form factor than the next best strategy: interior cushioning with a “dead” hard outer shell.http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SAV-1997-4304
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Suresh Goyal
Jim M. Papadopoulos
Paul A. Sullivan
spellingShingle Suresh Goyal
Jim M. Papadopoulos
Paul A. Sullivan
Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond
Shock and Vibration
author_facet Suresh Goyal
Jim M. Papadopoulos
Paul A. Sullivan
author_sort Suresh Goyal
title Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond
title_short Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond
title_full Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond
title_fullStr Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond
title_full_unstemmed Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond
title_sort shock protection of portable electronic products: shock response spectrum, damage boundary approach, and beyond
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Shock and Vibration
issn 1070-9622
1875-9203
publishDate 1997-01-01
description The pervasive shock response spectrum (SRS) and damage boundary methods for evaluating product fragility and designing external cushioning for shock protection are described in detail with references to the best available literature. Underlying assumptions are carefully reviewed and the central message of the SRS is highlighted, particularly as it relates to standardized drop testing. Shortcomings of these methods are discussed, and the results are extended to apply to more general systems. Finally some general packaging and shock-mounting strategies are discussed in the context of protecting a fragile disk drive in a notebook computer, although the conclusions apply to other products as well. For example, exterior only cushioning (with low restitution to reduce subsequent impacts) will provide a slenderer form factor than the next best strategy: interior cushioning with a “dead” hard outer shell.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SAV-1997-4304
work_keys_str_mv AT sureshgoyal shockprotectionofportableelectronicproductsshockresponsespectrumdamageboundaryapproachandbeyond
AT jimmpapadopoulos shockprotectionofportableelectronicproductsshockresponsespectrumdamageboundaryapproachandbeyond
AT paulasullivan shockprotectionofportableelectronicproductsshockresponsespectrumdamageboundaryapproachandbeyond
_version_ 1725543892284080128