Right ventricular functional analysis utilizing first pass radionuclide angiography for pre-operative ventricular assist device planning: a multi-modality comparison

Abstract Background Advanced heart failure treated with a left ventricular assist device is associated with a higher risk of right heart failure. Many advanced heart failures patients are treated with an ICD, a relative contraindication to MRI, prior to assist device placement. Given this limitation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryan Avery, Kevin Day, Clinton Jokerst, Toshinobu Kazui, Elizabeth Krupinski, Zain Khalpey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-10-01
Series:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13019-017-0652-y
id doaj-b767ebd2aacf43a0ab484089e7748ab7
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ryan Avery
Kevin Day
Clinton Jokerst
Toshinobu Kazui
Elizabeth Krupinski
Zain Khalpey
spellingShingle Ryan Avery
Kevin Day
Clinton Jokerst
Toshinobu Kazui
Elizabeth Krupinski
Zain Khalpey
Right ventricular functional analysis utilizing first pass radionuclide angiography for pre-operative ventricular assist device planning: a multi-modality comparison
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Magnetic resonance imaging
First pass radionuclide angiography
Multigated acquisition radionuclide angiography
Automatic implantable cardiac device
Right ventricular ejection fraction
Left ventricular ejection fraction
author_facet Ryan Avery
Kevin Day
Clinton Jokerst
Toshinobu Kazui
Elizabeth Krupinski
Zain Khalpey
author_sort Ryan Avery
title Right ventricular functional analysis utilizing first pass radionuclide angiography for pre-operative ventricular assist device planning: a multi-modality comparison
title_short Right ventricular functional analysis utilizing first pass radionuclide angiography for pre-operative ventricular assist device planning: a multi-modality comparison
title_full Right ventricular functional analysis utilizing first pass radionuclide angiography for pre-operative ventricular assist device planning: a multi-modality comparison
title_fullStr Right ventricular functional analysis utilizing first pass radionuclide angiography for pre-operative ventricular assist device planning: a multi-modality comparison
title_full_unstemmed Right ventricular functional analysis utilizing first pass radionuclide angiography for pre-operative ventricular assist device planning: a multi-modality comparison
title_sort right ventricular functional analysis utilizing first pass radionuclide angiography for pre-operative ventricular assist device planning: a multi-modality comparison
publisher BMC
series Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
issn 1749-8090
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Abstract Background Advanced heart failure treated with a left ventricular assist device is associated with a higher risk of right heart failure. Many advanced heart failures patients are treated with an ICD, a relative contraindication to MRI, prior to assist device placement. Given this limitation, left and right ventricular function for patients with an ICD is calculated using radionuclide angiography utilizing planar multigated acquisition (MUGA) and first pass radionuclide angiography (FPRNA), respectively. Given the availability of MRI protocols that can accommodate patients with ICDs, we have correlated the findings of ventricular functional analysis using radionuclide angiography to cardiac MRI, the reference standard for ventricle function calculation, to directly correlate calculated ejection fractions between these modalities, and to also assess agreement between available echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters of right ventricular function. Methods A retrospective review from January 2012 through May 2014 was performed to identify advanced heart failure patients who underwent both cardiac MRI and radionuclide angiography for ventricular functional analysis. Nine heart failure patients (8 men, 1 woman; mean age of 57.0 years) were identified. The average time between the cardiac MRI and radionuclide angiography exams was 38.9 days (range: 1 - 119 days). All patients undergoing cardiac MRI were scanned using an institutionally approved protocol for ICD with no device-related complications identified. A retrospective chart review of each patient for cardiomyopathy diagnosis, clinical follow-up, and echocardiogram and right heart catheterization performed during evaluation was also performed. Results The 9 patients demonstrated a mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using cardiac MRI of 20.7% (12 – 40%). Mean LVEF using MUGA was 22.6% (12 – 49%). The mean right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) utilizing cardiac MRI was 28.3% (16 – 43%), and the mean RVEF calculated by FPRNA was 32.6% (9 – 56%). The mean discrepancy for LVEF between cardiac MRI and MUGA was 4.1% (0 – 9%), and correlation of calculated LVEF using cardiac MRI and MUGA demonstrated an R of 0.9. The mean discrepancy for RVEF between cardiac MRI and FPRNA was 12.0% (range: 2 – 24%) with a moderate correlation (R = 0.5). The increased discrepancies for RV analysis were statistically significant using an unpaired t-test (t = 3.19, p = 0.0061). Echocardiogram parameters of RV function, including TAPSE and FAC, were for available for all 9 patients and agreement with cardiac MRI demonstrated a kappa statistic for TAPSE of 0.39 (95% CI of 0.06 – 0.72) and for FAC of 0.64 (95% of 0.21 – 1.00). Conclusion Heart failure patients are increasingly requiring left ventricular assist device placement; however, definitive evaluation of biventricular function is required due to the increased mortality rate associated with right heart failure after assist device placement. Our results suggest that FPRNA only has a moderate correlation with reference standard RVEFs calculated using cardiac MRI, which was similar to calculated agreements between cardiac MRI and echocardiographic parameters of right ventricular function. Given the need for identification of patients at risk for right heart failure, further studies are warranted to determine a more accurate estimate of RVEF for heart failure patients during pre-operative ventricular assist device planning.
topic Magnetic resonance imaging
First pass radionuclide angiography
Multigated acquisition radionuclide angiography
Automatic implantable cardiac device
Right ventricular ejection fraction
Left ventricular ejection fraction
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13019-017-0652-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanavery rightventricularfunctionalanalysisutilizingfirstpassradionuclideangiographyforpreoperativeventricularassistdeviceplanningamultimodalitycomparison
AT kevinday rightventricularfunctionalanalysisutilizingfirstpassradionuclideangiographyforpreoperativeventricularassistdeviceplanningamultimodalitycomparison
AT clintonjokerst rightventricularfunctionalanalysisutilizingfirstpassradionuclideangiographyforpreoperativeventricularassistdeviceplanningamultimodalitycomparison
AT toshinobukazui rightventricularfunctionalanalysisutilizingfirstpassradionuclideangiographyforpreoperativeventricularassistdeviceplanningamultimodalitycomparison
AT elizabethkrupinski rightventricularfunctionalanalysisutilizingfirstpassradionuclideangiographyforpreoperativeventricularassistdeviceplanningamultimodalitycomparison
AT zainkhalpey rightventricularfunctionalanalysisutilizingfirstpassradionuclideangiographyforpreoperativeventricularassistdeviceplanningamultimodalitycomparison
_version_ 1725080935169261568
spelling doaj-b767ebd2aacf43a0ab484089e7748ab72020-11-25T01:32:37ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902017-10-0112111010.1186/s13019-017-0652-yRight ventricular functional analysis utilizing first pass radionuclide angiography for pre-operative ventricular assist device planning: a multi-modality comparisonRyan Avery0Kevin Day1Clinton Jokerst2Toshinobu Kazui3Elizabeth Krupinski4Zain Khalpey5Department of Medical Imaging, Banner - University Medical CenterDepartment of Medical Imaging, Banner - University Medical CenterDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Hospital – PhoenixDepartment of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Banner – University Medical CenterDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Science, Emory University HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Banner – University Medical CenterAbstract Background Advanced heart failure treated with a left ventricular assist device is associated with a higher risk of right heart failure. Many advanced heart failures patients are treated with an ICD, a relative contraindication to MRI, prior to assist device placement. Given this limitation, left and right ventricular function for patients with an ICD is calculated using radionuclide angiography utilizing planar multigated acquisition (MUGA) and first pass radionuclide angiography (FPRNA), respectively. Given the availability of MRI protocols that can accommodate patients with ICDs, we have correlated the findings of ventricular functional analysis using radionuclide angiography to cardiac MRI, the reference standard for ventricle function calculation, to directly correlate calculated ejection fractions between these modalities, and to also assess agreement between available echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters of right ventricular function. Methods A retrospective review from January 2012 through May 2014 was performed to identify advanced heart failure patients who underwent both cardiac MRI and radionuclide angiography for ventricular functional analysis. Nine heart failure patients (8 men, 1 woman; mean age of 57.0 years) were identified. The average time between the cardiac MRI and radionuclide angiography exams was 38.9 days (range: 1 - 119 days). All patients undergoing cardiac MRI were scanned using an institutionally approved protocol for ICD with no device-related complications identified. A retrospective chart review of each patient for cardiomyopathy diagnosis, clinical follow-up, and echocardiogram and right heart catheterization performed during evaluation was also performed. Results The 9 patients demonstrated a mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using cardiac MRI of 20.7% (12 – 40%). Mean LVEF using MUGA was 22.6% (12 – 49%). The mean right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) utilizing cardiac MRI was 28.3% (16 – 43%), and the mean RVEF calculated by FPRNA was 32.6% (9 – 56%). The mean discrepancy for LVEF between cardiac MRI and MUGA was 4.1% (0 – 9%), and correlation of calculated LVEF using cardiac MRI and MUGA demonstrated an R of 0.9. The mean discrepancy for RVEF between cardiac MRI and FPRNA was 12.0% (range: 2 – 24%) with a moderate correlation (R = 0.5). The increased discrepancies for RV analysis were statistically significant using an unpaired t-test (t = 3.19, p = 0.0061). Echocardiogram parameters of RV function, including TAPSE and FAC, were for available for all 9 patients and agreement with cardiac MRI demonstrated a kappa statistic for TAPSE of 0.39 (95% CI of 0.06 – 0.72) and for FAC of 0.64 (95% of 0.21 – 1.00). Conclusion Heart failure patients are increasingly requiring left ventricular assist device placement; however, definitive evaluation of biventricular function is required due to the increased mortality rate associated with right heart failure after assist device placement. Our results suggest that FPRNA only has a moderate correlation with reference standard RVEFs calculated using cardiac MRI, which was similar to calculated agreements between cardiac MRI and echocardiographic parameters of right ventricular function. Given the need for identification of patients at risk for right heart failure, further studies are warranted to determine a more accurate estimate of RVEF for heart failure patients during pre-operative ventricular assist device planning.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13019-017-0652-yMagnetic resonance imagingFirst pass radionuclide angiographyMultigated acquisition radionuclide angiographyAutomatic implantable cardiac deviceRight ventricular ejection fractionLeft ventricular ejection fraction