Selecting an Optimal Staging System for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of 9 Currently Used Prognostic Models

Yong-Fa Zhang,1,2,* Ming Shi,3,* Liang-He Lu,3 Lu Wang,1,2 Rong-Ping Guo3 1Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People’s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhang YF, Shi M, Lu LH, Wang L, Guo RP
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2021-04-01
Series:Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/selecting-an-optimal-staging-system-for-intermediate-stage-hepatocellu-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JHC
id doaj-b759a3d1e51e4c19b9b9d59e58a852d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b759a3d1e51e4c19b9b9d59e58a852d92021-04-20T18:55:24ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma2253-59692021-04-01Volume 825326164023Selecting an Optimal Staging System for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of 9 Currently Used Prognostic ModelsZhang YFShi MLu LHWang LGuo RPYong-Fa Zhang,1,2,* Ming Shi,3,* Liang-He Lu,3 Lu Wang,1,2 Rong-Ping Guo3 1Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People’s Republic of China; 3The Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology of Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Lu WangDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +8620-64175590Email cms024mm@163.comRong-Ping GuoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +8620-87342266Email guorp@sysucc.org.cnPurpose: It remains unknown which staging system is best in predicting the survival of patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to investigate the performance of nine currently used HCC staging systems.Patients and Methods: Between 2005 and 2014, a large cohort of 880 consecutive patients with intermediate stage HCC and sufficient data for utilization in all staging systems were enrolled. The prognostic performance of each staging system was compared. Independent prognostic variables were also identified.Results: Multivariate analysis revealed that alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), etiology, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Child-Pugh stage, tumor size, and tumor number were independent prognostic factors for survival. In the entire cohort, the Hong Kong Liver Cancer (HKLC) staging system was associated with the highest Harrell’s c-index and lowest Akaike information criterion value in comparison with other systems. In subgroup analysis according to treatment strategy, the HKLC staging system remained the best prognostic model in patients undergoing hepatic resection (n=222) or transarterial chemoembolization (n=658). Additional prognostic factors of AST, ALP, etiology, and AFP improved the discriminatory ability of HKLC.Conclusion: The HKLC staging system is stable and consistently the best prognostic model in all patients with intermediate-stage HCC and in patients subjected to different treatment strategies. Selecting an optimal staging system is helpful in improving the design of future clinical trials in intermediate stage HCC.Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, intermediate-stage, staging system, prognosis, overall survival, hepatic resection, transarterial chemoembolizationhttps://www.dovepress.com/selecting-an-optimal-staging-system-for-intermediate-stage-hepatocellu-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JHChepatocellular carcinomaintermediate-stagestaging systemprognosisoverall survivalhepatic resectiontransarterial chemoembolization;
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhang YF
Shi M
Lu LH
Wang L
Guo RP
spellingShingle Zhang YF
Shi M
Lu LH
Wang L
Guo RP
Selecting an Optimal Staging System for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of 9 Currently Used Prognostic Models
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
hepatocellular carcinoma
intermediate-stage
staging system
prognosis
overall survival
hepatic resection
transarterial chemoembolization;
author_facet Zhang YF
Shi M
Lu LH
Wang L
Guo RP
author_sort Zhang YF
title Selecting an Optimal Staging System for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of 9 Currently Used Prognostic Models
title_short Selecting an Optimal Staging System for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of 9 Currently Used Prognostic Models
title_full Selecting an Optimal Staging System for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of 9 Currently Used Prognostic Models
title_fullStr Selecting an Optimal Staging System for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of 9 Currently Used Prognostic Models
title_full_unstemmed Selecting an Optimal Staging System for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of 9 Currently Used Prognostic Models
title_sort selecting an optimal staging system for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of 9 currently used prognostic models
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
issn 2253-5969
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Yong-Fa Zhang,1,2,* Ming Shi,3,* Liang-He Lu,3 Lu Wang,1,2 Rong-Ping Guo3 1Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People’s Republic of China; 3The Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology of Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Lu WangDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +8620-64175590Email cms024mm@163.comRong-Ping GuoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +8620-87342266Email guorp@sysucc.org.cnPurpose: It remains unknown which staging system is best in predicting the survival of patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to investigate the performance of nine currently used HCC staging systems.Patients and Methods: Between 2005 and 2014, a large cohort of 880 consecutive patients with intermediate stage HCC and sufficient data for utilization in all staging systems were enrolled. The prognostic performance of each staging system was compared. Independent prognostic variables were also identified.Results: Multivariate analysis revealed that alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), etiology, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Child-Pugh stage, tumor size, and tumor number were independent prognostic factors for survival. In the entire cohort, the Hong Kong Liver Cancer (HKLC) staging system was associated with the highest Harrell’s c-index and lowest Akaike information criterion value in comparison with other systems. In subgroup analysis according to treatment strategy, the HKLC staging system remained the best prognostic model in patients undergoing hepatic resection (n=222) or transarterial chemoembolization (n=658). Additional prognostic factors of AST, ALP, etiology, and AFP improved the discriminatory ability of HKLC.Conclusion: The HKLC staging system is stable and consistently the best prognostic model in all patients with intermediate-stage HCC and in patients subjected to different treatment strategies. Selecting an optimal staging system is helpful in improving the design of future clinical trials in intermediate stage HCC.Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, intermediate-stage, staging system, prognosis, overall survival, hepatic resection, transarterial chemoembolization
topic hepatocellular carcinoma
intermediate-stage
staging system
prognosis
overall survival
hepatic resection
transarterial chemoembolization;
url https://www.dovepress.com/selecting-an-optimal-staging-system-for-intermediate-stage-hepatocellu-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JHC
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyf selectinganoptimalstagingsystemforintermediatestagehepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonof9currentlyusedprognosticmodels
AT shim selectinganoptimalstagingsystemforintermediatestagehepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonof9currentlyusedprognosticmodels
AT lulh selectinganoptimalstagingsystemforintermediatestagehepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonof9currentlyusedprognosticmodels
AT wangl selectinganoptimalstagingsystemforintermediatestagehepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonof9currentlyusedprognosticmodels
AT guorp selectinganoptimalstagingsystemforintermediatestagehepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonof9currentlyusedprognosticmodels
_version_ 1721517406568841216