‘Model’ or ‘tool’? New definitions for translational research

Summary The term ‘model’ often describes non-human biological systems that are used to obtain a better understanding of human disorders. According to the most stringent definition, an animal ‘model’ would display exactly the same phenotype as seen in the relevant human disorder; however, this precis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hazel Sive
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Company of Biologists 2011-03-01
Series:Disease Models & Mechanisms
Online Access:http://dmm.biologists.org/content/4/2/137
id doaj-b758d300aad74c2c856689245bd84f4c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b758d300aad74c2c856689245bd84f4c2020-11-25T01:36:32ZengThe Company of BiologistsDisease Models & Mechanisms1754-84031754-84112011-03-014213713810.1242/dmm.007666007666‘Model’ or ‘tool’? New definitions for translational researchHazel SiveSummary The term ‘model’ often describes non-human biological systems that are used to obtain a better understanding of human disorders. According to the most stringent definition, an animal ‘model’ would display exactly the same phenotype as seen in the relevant human disorder; however, this precise correspondence is often not present. In this Editorial, I propose the alternative, broader term ‘tool’ to describe a biological system that does not obviously (or precisely) recapitulate a human disorder, but that nonetheless provides useful insight into the etiology or treatment of that disorder. Applying the term ‘tool’ to biological systems used in disease-related studies will help to identify those systems that can most effectively address mechanisms underlying human disease. Conversely, differentiating ‘models’ from ‘tools’ will help to define more clearly the limitations of biological systems used in preclinical analyses.http://dmm.biologists.org/content/4/2/137
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hazel Sive
spellingShingle Hazel Sive
‘Model’ or ‘tool’? New definitions for translational research
Disease Models & Mechanisms
author_facet Hazel Sive
author_sort Hazel Sive
title ‘Model’ or ‘tool’? New definitions for translational research
title_short ‘Model’ or ‘tool’? New definitions for translational research
title_full ‘Model’ or ‘tool’? New definitions for translational research
title_fullStr ‘Model’ or ‘tool’? New definitions for translational research
title_full_unstemmed ‘Model’ or ‘tool’? New definitions for translational research
title_sort ‘model’ or ‘tool’? new definitions for translational research
publisher The Company of Biologists
series Disease Models & Mechanisms
issn 1754-8403
1754-8411
publishDate 2011-03-01
description Summary The term ‘model’ often describes non-human biological systems that are used to obtain a better understanding of human disorders. According to the most stringent definition, an animal ‘model’ would display exactly the same phenotype as seen in the relevant human disorder; however, this precise correspondence is often not present. In this Editorial, I propose the alternative, broader term ‘tool’ to describe a biological system that does not obviously (or precisely) recapitulate a human disorder, but that nonetheless provides useful insight into the etiology or treatment of that disorder. Applying the term ‘tool’ to biological systems used in disease-related studies will help to identify those systems that can most effectively address mechanisms underlying human disease. Conversely, differentiating ‘models’ from ‘tools’ will help to define more clearly the limitations of biological systems used in preclinical analyses.
url http://dmm.biologists.org/content/4/2/137
work_keys_str_mv AT hazelsive modelortoolnewdefinitionsfortranslationalresearch
_version_ 1725062546554093568