Identification of Factors That Influence Energy Performance in Water Distribution System Mains

This paper aims at identifying paramount hydraulic factors in energy dynamics of water mains, using Principal Components Analysis (PCA). The proposed method is applied to two large ensembles of leaky and non-leaky pipes comprising over 40,000 pipes selected from 18 North American water distribution...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saeed Hashemi, Yves Filion, Vanessa Speight
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-04-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/4/428
id doaj-b7520d19f7554b95a37ea16be9c53a8f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b7520d19f7554b95a37ea16be9c53a8f2020-11-24T23:11:27ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412018-04-0110442810.3390/w10040428w10040428Identification of Factors That Influence Energy Performance in Water Distribution System MainsSaeed Hashemi0Yves FilionVanessa SpeightJacobs Engineering, Toronto, ON M2J 1R3, Canada 2 Civil Engineering Department, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, CanadaThis paper aims at identifying paramount hydraulic factors in energy dynamics of water mains, using Principal Components Analysis (PCA). The proposed method is applied to two large ensembles of leaky and non-leaky pipes comprising over 40,000 pipes selected from 18 North American water distribution systems to guarantee the versatility of pipe characteristics and statistical significance of the explored patterns. PCA mono-plots indicate energy metrics such as Net Energy Efficiency, Energy Lost to Friction and Energy Lost to Leakage serve better in identification of low from high efficiency pipes. In addition, PCA mono-plots and bi-plots reveal relative importance of hydraulic parameters and that average flow rate, hydraulic proximity to major components and average unit headloss can have more tangible effects on energy dynamics of pipes compared to leakage and average pressure. Some factors such as elevation, diameter and CHW are not as influential as expected in distinguishing high-efficiency from low-efficiency pipes. Further, a comparison between the approach used in this paper and a simplified common-practice replacement strategy points out the difference energy considerations can make, if included in a bigger asset management landscape.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/4/428energy efficiencyheadlossleakagepipe rehabilitationwater distribution systemsprincipal components analysis (PCA)asset management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Saeed Hashemi
Yves Filion
Vanessa Speight
spellingShingle Saeed Hashemi
Yves Filion
Vanessa Speight
Identification of Factors That Influence Energy Performance in Water Distribution System Mains
Water
energy efficiency
headloss
leakage
pipe rehabilitation
water distribution systems
principal components analysis (PCA)
asset management
author_facet Saeed Hashemi
Yves Filion
Vanessa Speight
author_sort Saeed Hashemi
title Identification of Factors That Influence Energy Performance in Water Distribution System Mains
title_short Identification of Factors That Influence Energy Performance in Water Distribution System Mains
title_full Identification of Factors That Influence Energy Performance in Water Distribution System Mains
title_fullStr Identification of Factors That Influence Energy Performance in Water Distribution System Mains
title_full_unstemmed Identification of Factors That Influence Energy Performance in Water Distribution System Mains
title_sort identification of factors that influence energy performance in water distribution system mains
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2018-04-01
description This paper aims at identifying paramount hydraulic factors in energy dynamics of water mains, using Principal Components Analysis (PCA). The proposed method is applied to two large ensembles of leaky and non-leaky pipes comprising over 40,000 pipes selected from 18 North American water distribution systems to guarantee the versatility of pipe characteristics and statistical significance of the explored patterns. PCA mono-plots indicate energy metrics such as Net Energy Efficiency, Energy Lost to Friction and Energy Lost to Leakage serve better in identification of low from high efficiency pipes. In addition, PCA mono-plots and bi-plots reveal relative importance of hydraulic parameters and that average flow rate, hydraulic proximity to major components and average unit headloss can have more tangible effects on energy dynamics of pipes compared to leakage and average pressure. Some factors such as elevation, diameter and CHW are not as influential as expected in distinguishing high-efficiency from low-efficiency pipes. Further, a comparison between the approach used in this paper and a simplified common-practice replacement strategy points out the difference energy considerations can make, if included in a bigger asset management landscape.
topic energy efficiency
headloss
leakage
pipe rehabilitation
water distribution systems
principal components analysis (PCA)
asset management
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/4/428
work_keys_str_mv AT saeedhashemi identificationoffactorsthatinfluenceenergyperformanceinwaterdistributionsystemmains
AT yvesfilion identificationoffactorsthatinfluenceenergyperformanceinwaterdistributionsystemmains
AT vanessaspeight identificationoffactorsthatinfluenceenergyperformanceinwaterdistributionsystemmains
_version_ 1725604464414425088