Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne Illness
The capacity of state and territorial health departments to investigate foodborne diseases was assessed by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists from 2001 to 2002 with a self-administered, web-based survey. Forty-eight health departments responded (47 states and 1 territory). The prim...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2005-01-01
|
Series: | Emerging Infectious Diseases |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/11/1/04-0334_article |
id |
doaj-b742808020fd46b9a63f661ab4f657ed |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b742808020fd46b9a63f661ab4f657ed2020-11-24T21:50:07ZengCenters for Disease Control and PreventionEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-60592005-01-01111111610.3201/eid1101.040334Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne IllnessRichard E. HoffmanJesse GreenblattBela T. MatyasDonald J. SharpEmilio EstebanKnachelle HodgeArthur LiangThe capacity of state and territorial health departments to investigate foodborne diseases was assessed by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists from 2001 to 2002 with a self-administered, web-based survey. Forty-eight health departments responded (47 states and 1 territory). The primary reason for not conducting more active case surveillance of enteric disease is lack of staff, while the primary reasons for not investigating foodborne disease outbreaks are limited staff and delayed notification of the outbreak. Sixty-four percent of respondents have the capacity to conduct analytic epidemiologic investigations. States receiving Emerging Infections Program (EIP) funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention more often reported having a dedicated foodborne disease epidemiologist and the capability to perform analytic studies than non-EIP states. We conclude that by addressing shortages in the number of dedicated personnel and reducing delays in reporting, the capacity of state health departments to respond to foodborne disease can be improved.https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/11/1/04-0334_articlefood poisoningepidemiologypublic health surveillancedisease outbreaksresearchUnited States |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Richard E. Hoffman Jesse Greenblatt Bela T. Matyas Donald J. Sharp Emilio Esteban Knachelle Hodge Arthur Liang |
spellingShingle |
Richard E. Hoffman Jesse Greenblatt Bela T. Matyas Donald J. Sharp Emilio Esteban Knachelle Hodge Arthur Liang Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne Illness Emerging Infectious Diseases food poisoning epidemiology public health surveillance disease outbreaks research United States |
author_facet |
Richard E. Hoffman Jesse Greenblatt Bela T. Matyas Donald J. Sharp Emilio Esteban Knachelle Hodge Arthur Liang |
author_sort |
Richard E. Hoffman |
title |
Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne Illness |
title_short |
Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne Illness |
title_full |
Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne Illness |
title_fullStr |
Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne Illness |
title_full_unstemmed |
Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne Illness |
title_sort |
capacity of state and territorial health agencies to prevent foodborne illness |
publisher |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
series |
Emerging Infectious Diseases |
issn |
1080-6040 1080-6059 |
publishDate |
2005-01-01 |
description |
The capacity of state and territorial health departments to investigate foodborne diseases was assessed by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists from 2001 to 2002 with a self-administered, web-based survey. Forty-eight health departments responded (47 states and 1 territory). The primary reason for not conducting more active case surveillance of enteric disease is lack of staff, while the primary reasons for not investigating foodborne disease outbreaks are limited staff and delayed notification of the outbreak. Sixty-four percent of respondents have the capacity to conduct analytic epidemiologic investigations. States receiving Emerging Infections Program (EIP) funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention more often reported having a dedicated foodborne disease epidemiologist and the capability to perform analytic studies than non-EIP states. We conclude that by addressing shortages in the number of dedicated personnel and reducing delays in reporting, the capacity of state health departments to respond to foodborne disease can be improved. |
topic |
food poisoning epidemiology public health surveillance disease outbreaks research United States |
url |
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/11/1/04-0334_article |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT richardehoffman capacityofstateandterritorialhealthagenciestopreventfoodborneillness AT jessegreenblatt capacityofstateandterritorialhealthagenciestopreventfoodborneillness AT belatmatyas capacityofstateandterritorialhealthagenciestopreventfoodborneillness AT donaldjsharp capacityofstateandterritorialhealthagenciestopreventfoodborneillness AT emilioesteban capacityofstateandterritorialhealthagenciestopreventfoodborneillness AT knachellehodge capacityofstateandterritorialhealthagenciestopreventfoodborneillness AT arthurliang capacityofstateandterritorialhealthagenciestopreventfoodborneillness |
_version_ |
1725885216568901632 |