Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne Illness

The capacity of state and territorial health departments to investigate foodborne diseases was assessed by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists from 2001 to 2002 with a self-administered, web-based survey. Forty-eight health departments responded (47 states and 1 territory). The prim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richard E. Hoffman, Jesse Greenblatt, Bela T. Matyas, Donald J. Sharp, Emilio Esteban, Knachelle Hodge, Arthur Liang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2005-01-01
Series:Emerging Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/11/1/04-0334_article
id doaj-b742808020fd46b9a63f661ab4f657ed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b742808020fd46b9a63f661ab4f657ed2020-11-24T21:50:07ZengCenters for Disease Control and PreventionEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-60592005-01-01111111610.3201/eid1101.040334Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne IllnessRichard E. HoffmanJesse GreenblattBela T. MatyasDonald J. SharpEmilio EstebanKnachelle HodgeArthur LiangThe capacity of state and territorial health departments to investigate foodborne diseases was assessed by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists from 2001 to 2002 with a self-administered, web-based survey. Forty-eight health departments responded (47 states and 1 territory). The primary reason for not conducting more active case surveillance of enteric disease is lack of staff, while the primary reasons for not investigating foodborne disease outbreaks are limited staff and delayed notification of the outbreak. Sixty-four percent of respondents have the capacity to conduct analytic epidemiologic investigations. States receiving Emerging Infections Program (EIP) funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention more often reported having a dedicated foodborne disease epidemiologist and the capability to perform analytic studies than non-EIP states. We conclude that by addressing shortages in the number of dedicated personnel and reducing delays in reporting, the capacity of state health departments to respond to foodborne disease can be improved.https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/11/1/04-0334_articlefood poisoningepidemiologypublic health surveillancedisease outbreaksresearchUnited States
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richard E. Hoffman
Jesse Greenblatt
Bela T. Matyas
Donald J. Sharp
Emilio Esteban
Knachelle Hodge
Arthur Liang
spellingShingle Richard E. Hoffman
Jesse Greenblatt
Bela T. Matyas
Donald J. Sharp
Emilio Esteban
Knachelle Hodge
Arthur Liang
Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne Illness
Emerging Infectious Diseases
food poisoning
epidemiology
public health surveillance
disease outbreaks
research
United States
author_facet Richard E. Hoffman
Jesse Greenblatt
Bela T. Matyas
Donald J. Sharp
Emilio Esteban
Knachelle Hodge
Arthur Liang
author_sort Richard E. Hoffman
title Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne Illness
title_short Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne Illness
title_full Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne Illness
title_fullStr Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne Illness
title_full_unstemmed Capacity of State and Territorial Health Agencies to Prevent Foodborne Illness
title_sort capacity of state and territorial health agencies to prevent foodborne illness
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
series Emerging Infectious Diseases
issn 1080-6040
1080-6059
publishDate 2005-01-01
description The capacity of state and territorial health departments to investigate foodborne diseases was assessed by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists from 2001 to 2002 with a self-administered, web-based survey. Forty-eight health departments responded (47 states and 1 territory). The primary reason for not conducting more active case surveillance of enteric disease is lack of staff, while the primary reasons for not investigating foodborne disease outbreaks are limited staff and delayed notification of the outbreak. Sixty-four percent of respondents have the capacity to conduct analytic epidemiologic investigations. States receiving Emerging Infections Program (EIP) funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention more often reported having a dedicated foodborne disease epidemiologist and the capability to perform analytic studies than non-EIP states. We conclude that by addressing shortages in the number of dedicated personnel and reducing delays in reporting, the capacity of state health departments to respond to foodborne disease can be improved.
topic food poisoning
epidemiology
public health surveillance
disease outbreaks
research
United States
url https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/11/1/04-0334_article
work_keys_str_mv AT richardehoffman capacityofstateandterritorialhealthagenciestopreventfoodborneillness
AT jessegreenblatt capacityofstateandterritorialhealthagenciestopreventfoodborneillness
AT belatmatyas capacityofstateandterritorialhealthagenciestopreventfoodborneillness
AT donaldjsharp capacityofstateandterritorialhealthagenciestopreventfoodborneillness
AT emilioesteban capacityofstateandterritorialhealthagenciestopreventfoodborneillness
AT knachellehodge capacityofstateandterritorialhealthagenciestopreventfoodborneillness
AT arthurliang capacityofstateandterritorialhealthagenciestopreventfoodborneillness
_version_ 1725885216568901632