Nutritional quality of dry food for adult dogs, commercialized in Rio Verde-GO.

We evaluated the nutritional quality of dry food for adult dogs, checking whether the label information was in agreement with the law and with the analyses, and also whether the suggested intake reached the nutritional requirements of adult dogs. Eighteen samples of commercial feed, eight of the eco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Cristina de Oliveira, William Germano Carpim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina 2009-06-01
Series:Biotemas
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biotemas.ufsc.br/volumes/pdf/volume222/181a186.pdf
id doaj-b742268a7df14a698c8cd70150a8bd79
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b742268a7df14a698c8cd70150a8bd792020-11-25T02:03:11ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaBiotemas0103-16432009-06-01222181186Nutritional quality of dry food for adult dogs, commercialized in Rio Verde-GO.Maria Cristina de OliveiraWilliam Germano CarpimWe evaluated the nutritional quality of dry food for adult dogs, checking whether the label information was in agreement with the law and with the analyses, and also whether the suggested intake reached the nutritional requirements of adult dogs. Eighteen samples of commercial feed, eight of the economical type and 10 of the premium type, were purchased and analyzed. Regarding the product descriptions, only 12.5 and 10% (moisture), 87.5 and 70% (CP), 25 and 20% (AHEE), 0 and 0% (MM), 12.5 and 40% (Ca) and 0 and 20% (P) of the economical and premium foods, respectively, were in conformity according to the label. Regarding the guarantee levels, most of the foods showed levels which were under the limits. The suggested daily average intake of premium food was 13.07% lower, CP and P intakes were 10 and 16.97% higher, and Ca and EM intakes were 16.27 and 11.15% lower compared to the suggested economical food intake. It was concluded that the dry food for adult dogs, sold in Rio Verde, has a good quality because it reaches the required limits, but there are deficiencies in the label information related to the guarantee levels, and there are excesses in the daily energy supply with the use of economical food.http://www.biotemas.ufsc.br/volumes/pdf/volume222/181a186.pdfanimal nutritionfood typenutritive value
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria Cristina de Oliveira
William Germano Carpim
spellingShingle Maria Cristina de Oliveira
William Germano Carpim
Nutritional quality of dry food for adult dogs, commercialized in Rio Verde-GO.
Biotemas
animal nutrition
food type
nutritive value
author_facet Maria Cristina de Oliveira
William Germano Carpim
author_sort Maria Cristina de Oliveira
title Nutritional quality of dry food for adult dogs, commercialized in Rio Verde-GO.
title_short Nutritional quality of dry food for adult dogs, commercialized in Rio Verde-GO.
title_full Nutritional quality of dry food for adult dogs, commercialized in Rio Verde-GO.
title_fullStr Nutritional quality of dry food for adult dogs, commercialized in Rio Verde-GO.
title_full_unstemmed Nutritional quality of dry food for adult dogs, commercialized in Rio Verde-GO.
title_sort nutritional quality of dry food for adult dogs, commercialized in rio verde-go.
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
series Biotemas
issn 0103-1643
publishDate 2009-06-01
description We evaluated the nutritional quality of dry food for adult dogs, checking whether the label information was in agreement with the law and with the analyses, and also whether the suggested intake reached the nutritional requirements of adult dogs. Eighteen samples of commercial feed, eight of the economical type and 10 of the premium type, were purchased and analyzed. Regarding the product descriptions, only 12.5 and 10% (moisture), 87.5 and 70% (CP), 25 and 20% (AHEE), 0 and 0% (MM), 12.5 and 40% (Ca) and 0 and 20% (P) of the economical and premium foods, respectively, were in conformity according to the label. Regarding the guarantee levels, most of the foods showed levels which were under the limits. The suggested daily average intake of premium food was 13.07% lower, CP and P intakes were 10 and 16.97% higher, and Ca and EM intakes were 16.27 and 11.15% lower compared to the suggested economical food intake. It was concluded that the dry food for adult dogs, sold in Rio Verde, has a good quality because it reaches the required limits, but there are deficiencies in the label information related to the guarantee levels, and there are excesses in the daily energy supply with the use of economical food.
topic animal nutrition
food type
nutritive value
url http://www.biotemas.ufsc.br/volumes/pdf/volume222/181a186.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mariacristinadeoliveira nutritionalqualityofdryfoodforadultdogscommercializedinrioverdego
AT williamgermanocarpim nutritionalqualityofdryfoodforadultdogscommercializedinrioverdego
_version_ 1724948810501718016