Supportive Care Network: Evaluation of Its Impact on the Performance of a Urology Department

Introduction: Hospitals are dealing with patients who may have clinical discharge but cannot return to their home due to non-medical issues. Material and Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of all the cases referred to the Integrated Care Network during the year 2016. Evaluation of waiting times, typo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hugo Antunes, Edgar Tavares-da-Silva, Miguel Eliseu, Belmiro Parada, Maria Cunha, António Roseiro, Arnaldo Figueiredo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ordem dos Médicos 2018-11-01
Series:Acta Médica Portuguesa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9940
id doaj-b72a89602b014536aa0c7607b5f4b48d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b72a89602b014536aa0c7607b5f4b48d2020-11-25T02:32:41ZengOrdem dos MédicosActa Médica Portuguesa0870-399X1646-07582018-11-01311165666010.20344/amp.99404756Supportive Care Network: Evaluation of Its Impact on the Performance of a Urology DepartmentHugo Antunes0Edgar Tavares-da-Silva1Miguel Eliseu2Belmiro Parada3Maria Cunha4António Roseiro5Arnaldo Figueiredo6Urology and Renal Transplantation Department. Coimbra University Hospital Center. Coimbra.Urology and Renal Transplantation Department. Coimbra University Hospital Center. Coimbra.Urology and Renal Transplantation Department. Coimbra University Hospital Center. Coimbra.Urology and Renal Transplantation Department. Coimbra University Hospital Center. Coimbra.Urology and Renal Transplantation Department. Coimbra University Hospital Center. Coimbra.Urology and Renal Transplantation Department. Coimbra University Hospital Center. Coimbra.Urology and Renal Transplantation Department. Coimbra University Hospital Center. Coimbra.Introduction: Hospitals are dealing with patients who may have clinical discharge but cannot return to their home due to non-medical issues. Material and Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of all the cases referred to the Integrated Care Network during the year 2016. Evaluation of waiting times, typology, reason for referral and clinical parameters. IBM SPSS 24.0 software was used for all statistical analyses. Results: In the evaluated period, 2294 patients were discharged from our department. Of these, 55 were referred to Integrated Care Network. The mean length of hospitalization of the patients referred to the network was 20.6 ± 11.4 days, and the mean overall length of hospital stay in the period analyzed was 4.8 ± 0.9 days. The mean time between hospitalization and referral for continuing care was 10.7 ± 7.2 days. The time between referral and discharge of the hospital was 10.0 ± 8.7 days. Thirty-nine (70.9%) patients were hospitalized for oncological diseases. The most common referral was to Palliative Care units (n = 16; 29.1%). Patients referred to Palliative Care units showed the largest waiting times between the referral for the network and the hospital discharge, 12.2 ± 10.51 days. We observed 289 hospitalization days with patients who had no need of specialized urological care. Discussion: In order to reduce time between referral to the network and hospital discharge, there is a need for enhanced cooperation and coordination among doctors, nurses and social workers. Conclusion: Early identification by physicians and nurses of patients who will require care after discharge will provide a better response from social workers and increased hospital performance.https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9940GeriatricsLength of StayPalliative CareReferral and ConsultationUrology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hugo Antunes
Edgar Tavares-da-Silva
Miguel Eliseu
Belmiro Parada
Maria Cunha
António Roseiro
Arnaldo Figueiredo
spellingShingle Hugo Antunes
Edgar Tavares-da-Silva
Miguel Eliseu
Belmiro Parada
Maria Cunha
António Roseiro
Arnaldo Figueiredo
Supportive Care Network: Evaluation of Its Impact on the Performance of a Urology Department
Acta Médica Portuguesa
Geriatrics
Length of Stay
Palliative Care
Referral and Consultation
Urology
author_facet Hugo Antunes
Edgar Tavares-da-Silva
Miguel Eliseu
Belmiro Parada
Maria Cunha
António Roseiro
Arnaldo Figueiredo
author_sort Hugo Antunes
title Supportive Care Network: Evaluation of Its Impact on the Performance of a Urology Department
title_short Supportive Care Network: Evaluation of Its Impact on the Performance of a Urology Department
title_full Supportive Care Network: Evaluation of Its Impact on the Performance of a Urology Department
title_fullStr Supportive Care Network: Evaluation of Its Impact on the Performance of a Urology Department
title_full_unstemmed Supportive Care Network: Evaluation of Its Impact on the Performance of a Urology Department
title_sort supportive care network: evaluation of its impact on the performance of a urology department
publisher Ordem dos Médicos
series Acta Médica Portuguesa
issn 0870-399X
1646-0758
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Introduction: Hospitals are dealing with patients who may have clinical discharge but cannot return to their home due to non-medical issues. Material and Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of all the cases referred to the Integrated Care Network during the year 2016. Evaluation of waiting times, typology, reason for referral and clinical parameters. IBM SPSS 24.0 software was used for all statistical analyses. Results: In the evaluated period, 2294 patients were discharged from our department. Of these, 55 were referred to Integrated Care Network. The mean length of hospitalization of the patients referred to the network was 20.6 ± 11.4 days, and the mean overall length of hospital stay in the period analyzed was 4.8 ± 0.9 days. The mean time between hospitalization and referral for continuing care was 10.7 ± 7.2 days. The time between referral and discharge of the hospital was 10.0 ± 8.7 days. Thirty-nine (70.9%) patients were hospitalized for oncological diseases. The most common referral was to Palliative Care units (n = 16; 29.1%). Patients referred to Palliative Care units showed the largest waiting times between the referral for the network and the hospital discharge, 12.2 ± 10.51 days. We observed 289 hospitalization days with patients who had no need of specialized urological care. Discussion: In order to reduce time between referral to the network and hospital discharge, there is a need for enhanced cooperation and coordination among doctors, nurses and social workers. Conclusion: Early identification by physicians and nurses of patients who will require care after discharge will provide a better response from social workers and increased hospital performance.
topic Geriatrics
Length of Stay
Palliative Care
Referral and Consultation
Urology
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9940
work_keys_str_mv AT hugoantunes supportivecarenetworkevaluationofitsimpactontheperformanceofaurologydepartment
AT edgartavaresdasilva supportivecarenetworkevaluationofitsimpactontheperformanceofaurologydepartment
AT migueleliseu supportivecarenetworkevaluationofitsimpactontheperformanceofaurologydepartment
AT belmiroparada supportivecarenetworkevaluationofitsimpactontheperformanceofaurologydepartment
AT mariacunha supportivecarenetworkevaluationofitsimpactontheperformanceofaurologydepartment
AT antonioroseiro supportivecarenetworkevaluationofitsimpactontheperformanceofaurologydepartment
AT arnaldofigueiredo supportivecarenetworkevaluationofitsimpactontheperformanceofaurologydepartment
_version_ 1724818526619828224