Verapamil Inhibits Aspergillus Biofilm, but Antagonizes Voriconazole

The paucity of effective antifungals against Aspergillus and increasing resistance, the recognition of the importance of Aspergillus biofilm in several clinical settings, and reports of verapamil—a calcium channel blocker—efficacy against Candida biofilm and hyphal growth, and synergy with an azole...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hasan Nazik, Varun Choudhary, David A. Stevens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-09-01
Series:Journal of Fungi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/3/3/50
id doaj-b70fc73b7993437bb932dfa298a282d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b70fc73b7993437bb932dfa298a282d72020-11-24T21:53:28ZengMDPI AGJournal of Fungi2309-608X2017-09-01335010.3390/jof3030050jof3030050Verapamil Inhibits Aspergillus Biofilm, but Antagonizes VoriconazoleHasan Nazik0Varun Choudhary1David A. Stevens2California Institute for Medical Research, 2260 Clove Dr., San Jose, CA 95128, USACalifornia Institute for Medical Research, 2260 Clove Dr., San Jose, CA 95128, USACalifornia Institute for Medical Research, 2260 Clove Dr., San Jose, CA 95128, USAThe paucity of effective antifungals against Aspergillus and increasing resistance, the recognition of the importance of Aspergillus biofilm in several clinical settings, and reports of verapamil—a calcium channel blocker—efficacy against Candida biofilm and hyphal growth, and synergy with an azole antifungal in vitro, led to a study of verapamil ± voriconazole against Aspergillus. Broth macrodilution methodology was utilized for MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) and MFC (minimum fungicidal concentration) determination. The metabolic effects (assessed by XTT [2,3-bis[2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl]-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide inner salt]) on biofilm formation by conidia were studied upon exposure to verapamil, verapamil plus voriconazole, or voriconazole alone. For biofilm formation, we found less inhibition from the combinations than with either drug alone, or less inhibition from the combination than that of the more potent drug alone. For preformed biofilm, we found no significant change in activity comparing voriconazole alone compared to added verapamil, and no significant alteration of activity of the more potent voriconazole, at any concentration in the range tested, by addition of a concentration of verapamil that is inhibitory alone. In full checkerboard assays with planktonic fungus, there was no indication of any effect of one drug on the other (indifference). Although verapamil was similarly inactive against planktonic Aspergillus, as with Candida, verapamil was indeed active against Aspergillus biofilm. However, indifference and antagonism was found with voriconazole.https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/3/3/50verapamilAspergillusbiofilmvoriconazole
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hasan Nazik
Varun Choudhary
David A. Stevens
spellingShingle Hasan Nazik
Varun Choudhary
David A. Stevens
Verapamil Inhibits Aspergillus Biofilm, but Antagonizes Voriconazole
Journal of Fungi
verapamil
Aspergillus
biofilm
voriconazole
author_facet Hasan Nazik
Varun Choudhary
David A. Stevens
author_sort Hasan Nazik
title Verapamil Inhibits Aspergillus Biofilm, but Antagonizes Voriconazole
title_short Verapamil Inhibits Aspergillus Biofilm, but Antagonizes Voriconazole
title_full Verapamil Inhibits Aspergillus Biofilm, but Antagonizes Voriconazole
title_fullStr Verapamil Inhibits Aspergillus Biofilm, but Antagonizes Voriconazole
title_full_unstemmed Verapamil Inhibits Aspergillus Biofilm, but Antagonizes Voriconazole
title_sort verapamil inhibits aspergillus biofilm, but antagonizes voriconazole
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Fungi
issn 2309-608X
publishDate 2017-09-01
description The paucity of effective antifungals against Aspergillus and increasing resistance, the recognition of the importance of Aspergillus biofilm in several clinical settings, and reports of verapamil—a calcium channel blocker—efficacy against Candida biofilm and hyphal growth, and synergy with an azole antifungal in vitro, led to a study of verapamil ± voriconazole against Aspergillus. Broth macrodilution methodology was utilized for MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) and MFC (minimum fungicidal concentration) determination. The metabolic effects (assessed by XTT [2,3-bis[2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl]-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide inner salt]) on biofilm formation by conidia were studied upon exposure to verapamil, verapamil plus voriconazole, or voriconazole alone. For biofilm formation, we found less inhibition from the combinations than with either drug alone, or less inhibition from the combination than that of the more potent drug alone. For preformed biofilm, we found no significant change in activity comparing voriconazole alone compared to added verapamil, and no significant alteration of activity of the more potent voriconazole, at any concentration in the range tested, by addition of a concentration of verapamil that is inhibitory alone. In full checkerboard assays with planktonic fungus, there was no indication of any effect of one drug on the other (indifference). Although verapamil was similarly inactive against planktonic Aspergillus, as with Candida, verapamil was indeed active against Aspergillus biofilm. However, indifference and antagonism was found with voriconazole.
topic verapamil
Aspergillus
biofilm
voriconazole
url https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/3/3/50
work_keys_str_mv AT hasannazik verapamilinhibitsaspergillusbiofilmbutantagonizesvoriconazole
AT varunchoudhary verapamilinhibitsaspergillusbiofilmbutantagonizesvoriconazole
AT davidastevens verapamilinhibitsaspergillusbiofilmbutantagonizesvoriconazole
_version_ 1725871918383366144