Polysemy and interdiscursivity in Bruno Drummond’s cartoons: a linguistic-discoursive approach

The study presented here makes a linguistic-discursive approach to Bruno Drummond's cartoons. It establishes, initially, a distinction, in the field of graphic humor, between charge, cartoon and caricature. Next, it highlights the characteristics of the cartoon. For the corpus analysis, it empl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: André Crim Valente
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal Fluminense 2020-01-01
Series:Gragoatá
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/34179
id doaj-b70087dbe6034dad9573c8936054cad7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b70087dbe6034dad9573c8936054cad72020-11-25T03:28:00ZporUniversidade Federal FluminenseGragoatá1413-90732358-41142020-01-01245078580810.22409/gragoata.v24i50.3417918996Polysemy and interdiscursivity in Bruno Drummond’s cartoons: a linguistic-discoursive approachAndré Crim Valente0Universidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroThe study presented here makes a linguistic-discursive approach to Bruno Drummond's cartoons. It establishes, initially, a distinction, in the field of graphic humor, between charge, cartoon and caricature. Next, it highlights the characteristics of the cartoon. For the corpus analysis, it employs the concepts of polisemy and interdiscursivity establishing the differences between the latter and the concept of intertextuality. In the theoretical basis of graphic humor, the considerations of Teixeira (2005) and the author under analysis (2007) are prioritized. As regards the interdiscursivity / intertextuality binomial, the studies of Jenny (1979), Dallenbach (1979) and Fiorin (2003) are highlighted. In the approach of polysemy, in comparison with homonymy and synonymy, the works of Borba(1970) and Gonzáles et al.(1989) are valued. Finally, the corpus analysis are supported by the considerations of Charaudeau (2005) regarding the concepts of sign of language and sign of discourse, as well as his observations on discursive inferences.https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/34179humorlínguadiscursopolissemiainterdiscurso.
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author André Crim Valente
spellingShingle André Crim Valente
Polysemy and interdiscursivity in Bruno Drummond’s cartoons: a linguistic-discoursive approach
Gragoatá
humor
língua
discurso
polissemia
interdiscurso.
author_facet André Crim Valente
author_sort André Crim Valente
title Polysemy and interdiscursivity in Bruno Drummond’s cartoons: a linguistic-discoursive approach
title_short Polysemy and interdiscursivity in Bruno Drummond’s cartoons: a linguistic-discoursive approach
title_full Polysemy and interdiscursivity in Bruno Drummond’s cartoons: a linguistic-discoursive approach
title_fullStr Polysemy and interdiscursivity in Bruno Drummond’s cartoons: a linguistic-discoursive approach
title_full_unstemmed Polysemy and interdiscursivity in Bruno Drummond’s cartoons: a linguistic-discoursive approach
title_sort polysemy and interdiscursivity in bruno drummond’s cartoons: a linguistic-discoursive approach
publisher Universidade Federal Fluminense
series Gragoatá
issn 1413-9073
2358-4114
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The study presented here makes a linguistic-discursive approach to Bruno Drummond's cartoons. It establishes, initially, a distinction, in the field of graphic humor, between charge, cartoon and caricature. Next, it highlights the characteristics of the cartoon. For the corpus analysis, it employs the concepts of polisemy and interdiscursivity establishing the differences between the latter and the concept of intertextuality. In the theoretical basis of graphic humor, the considerations of Teixeira (2005) and the author under analysis (2007) are prioritized. As regards the interdiscursivity / intertextuality binomial, the studies of Jenny (1979), Dallenbach (1979) and Fiorin (2003) are highlighted. In the approach of polysemy, in comparison with homonymy and synonymy, the works of Borba(1970) and Gonzáles et al.(1989) are valued. Finally, the corpus analysis are supported by the considerations of Charaudeau (2005) regarding the concepts of sign of language and sign of discourse, as well as his observations on discursive inferences.
topic humor
língua
discurso
polissemia
interdiscurso.
url https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/34179
work_keys_str_mv AT andrecrimvalente polysemyandinterdiscursivityinbrunodrummondscartoonsalinguisticdiscoursiveapproach
_version_ 1724585918330830848