On the bioactivity and mechanical properties of gehlenite nanobioceramic: A comparative study
Background: For a new biomaterial which is going to be applied in bone tissue regeneration, bioactivity (bone bonding ability) and desirable mechanical properties are very essential parameters to take into consideration. In the present study, the gehlenite's mechanical properties and bioactivit...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jmssjournal.net/article.asp?issn=2228-7477;year=2020;volume=10;issue=2;spage=105;epage=112;aulast=Bigham |
id |
doaj-b6f9a4ebd7a04e83b25c5cbfd5733c49 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b6f9a4ebd7a04e83b25c5cbfd5733c492020-11-25T02:07:42ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Medical Signals and Sensors2228-74772020-01-0110210511210.4103/jmss.JMSS_41_19On the bioactivity and mechanical properties of gehlenite nanobioceramic: A comparative studyAshkan BighamSaeed KermaniAhmad SaudiAmir Hamed AghajanianMohammad RafieniaBackground: For a new biomaterial which is going to be applied in bone tissue regeneration, bioactivity (bone bonding ability) and desirable mechanical properties are very essential parameters to take into consideration. In the present study, the gehlenite's mechanical properties and bioactivity are assessed and compared with hydroxyapatite (HA) for bone tissue regeneration. Method: Gehlenite and HA nanoparticles are synthesized through sol–gel method and coprecipitation technique, respectively, and their physical and chemical properties are characterized through X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. Results: The results prove that the gehlenite and HA phases without any undesirable phase are obtained, and the particles of both compounds are in the nanometer range with spherical morphology. The compressive strength of both compounds are assessed, and the values for gehlenite and HA disks are 144 ± 5 and 150 ± 4.8 MPa, respectively. Next, their bioactivity potential is assessed into simulated body fluid (SBF) up to 21 days, and the results show that after 14 days, gehlenite disk's surface is completely covered with newly formed Ca-P particles. However, some sporadic precipitations after 21 days soaking into SBF are formed onto the HA disk's surface. Conclusion: This comparative study shows that nanostructured gehlenite disk with desirable mechanical properties and faster bioactivity kinetic than HA can be considered as a promising bioceramic for bone tissue regeneration.http://www.jmssjournal.net/article.asp?issn=2228-7477;year=2020;volume=10;issue=2;spage=105;epage=112;aulast=Bighambioactivitygehlenitehydroxyapatitemechanical properties |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ashkan Bigham Saeed Kermani Ahmad Saudi Amir Hamed Aghajanian Mohammad Rafienia |
spellingShingle |
Ashkan Bigham Saeed Kermani Ahmad Saudi Amir Hamed Aghajanian Mohammad Rafienia On the bioactivity and mechanical properties of gehlenite nanobioceramic: A comparative study Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors bioactivity gehlenite hydroxyapatite mechanical properties |
author_facet |
Ashkan Bigham Saeed Kermani Ahmad Saudi Amir Hamed Aghajanian Mohammad Rafienia |
author_sort |
Ashkan Bigham |
title |
On the bioactivity and mechanical properties of gehlenite nanobioceramic: A comparative study |
title_short |
On the bioactivity and mechanical properties of gehlenite nanobioceramic: A comparative study |
title_full |
On the bioactivity and mechanical properties of gehlenite nanobioceramic: A comparative study |
title_fullStr |
On the bioactivity and mechanical properties of gehlenite nanobioceramic: A comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the bioactivity and mechanical properties of gehlenite nanobioceramic: A comparative study |
title_sort |
on the bioactivity and mechanical properties of gehlenite nanobioceramic: a comparative study |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Medical Signals and Sensors |
issn |
2228-7477 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Background: For a new biomaterial which is going to be applied in bone tissue regeneration, bioactivity (bone bonding ability) and desirable mechanical properties are very essential parameters to take into consideration. In the present study, the gehlenite's mechanical properties and bioactivity are assessed and compared with hydroxyapatite (HA) for bone tissue regeneration. Method: Gehlenite and HA nanoparticles are synthesized through sol–gel method and coprecipitation technique, respectively, and their physical and chemical properties are characterized through X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. Results: The results prove that the gehlenite and HA phases without any undesirable phase are obtained, and the particles of both compounds are in the nanometer range with spherical morphology. The compressive strength of both compounds are assessed, and the values for gehlenite and HA disks are 144 ± 5 and 150 ± 4.8 MPa, respectively. Next, their bioactivity potential is assessed into simulated body fluid (SBF) up to 21 days, and the results show that after 14 days, gehlenite disk's surface is completely covered with newly formed Ca-P particles. However, some sporadic precipitations after 21 days soaking into SBF are formed onto the HA disk's surface. Conclusion: This comparative study shows that nanostructured gehlenite disk with desirable mechanical properties and faster bioactivity kinetic than HA can be considered as a promising bioceramic for bone tissue regeneration. |
topic |
bioactivity gehlenite hydroxyapatite mechanical properties |
url |
http://www.jmssjournal.net/article.asp?issn=2228-7477;year=2020;volume=10;issue=2;spage=105;epage=112;aulast=Bigham |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ashkanbigham onthebioactivityandmechanicalpropertiesofgehlenitenanobioceramicacomparativestudy AT saeedkermani onthebioactivityandmechanicalpropertiesofgehlenitenanobioceramicacomparativestudy AT ahmadsaudi onthebioactivityandmechanicalpropertiesofgehlenitenanobioceramicacomparativestudy AT amirhamedaghajanian onthebioactivityandmechanicalpropertiesofgehlenitenanobioceramicacomparativestudy AT mohammadrafienia onthebioactivityandmechanicalpropertiesofgehlenitenanobioceramicacomparativestudy |
_version_ |
1724930207010258944 |