The agency origins of insider trading

Insider trading has been a topical issue in recent times. While the debate regarding insider trading usually extends to economic and ethical arguments in favour of or against the practice, in this article we attempt to ascertain the causes of the practice. The origins of insider trading are traced t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sinclair Davidson, David Solomon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 1991-12-01
Series:South African Journal of Business Management
Online Access:https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/905
id doaj-b6b7a45f7f7c4284949eed07d33f0d8e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b6b7a45f7f7c4284949eed07d33f0d8e2021-02-02T04:16:52ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Business Management2078-55852078-59761991-12-01224879310.4102/sajbm.v22i4.905626The agency origins of insider tradingSinclair Davidson0David Solomon1Department of Business Economics, University of the WitwatersrandDepartment of Business Economics, University of the WitwatersrandInsider trading has been a topical issue in recent times. While the debate regarding insider trading usually extends to economic and ethical arguments in favour of or against the practice, in this article we attempt to ascertain the causes of the practice. The origins of insider trading are traced to the separation of ownership and control. It has been argued that insider trading is beneficial to minority shareholders and reduces the agency cost problem; this is shown to be fallacious. The authors conclude that insider trading is an agency problem and that the disciplinary mechanisms described in the literature do not inhibit the phenomena, indeed some of these mechanisms actually facilitate the occurrence of insider trading. This it is argued provides the rationale for government intervention and anti-insider trading legislation. Binnekringtransaksies het onlangs heelwat opspraak gewek. Die debat oor binnekringtransaksies bestaan hoofsaaklik uit die aanvoer van ekonomiese of etiese argumente vir of teen die praktyk. In hierdie artikel word gepoog om die oorsake van hierdie praktyk vas te stel. Die oorsprong van binnekringtransaksies word teruggevoer na die skeiding van eienaarskap en beheer. Daar is al aangevoer dat binnekringtransaksies tot die voordeel van minderheidsaandeelhouers strek, aangesien dit die agentskapsprobleem verminder, maar in hierdie artikel word aangetoon dat dit nie die geval is nie. Die skrywers kom tot die gevolgtrekking dat binnekringtransaksies 'n agentskapsprobleem is en dat die meganismes, wat volgens die literatuur hierdie praktyk aan bande behoort te le, dit in werklikheid vergemaklik. Daar word ook aangevoer dat die beweegrede vir optrede deur die staat, asook wetgewing om binnekringtransaksies te bekamp, hieruit voortspruit.https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/905
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sinclair Davidson
David Solomon
spellingShingle Sinclair Davidson
David Solomon
The agency origins of insider trading
South African Journal of Business Management
author_facet Sinclair Davidson
David Solomon
author_sort Sinclair Davidson
title The agency origins of insider trading
title_short The agency origins of insider trading
title_full The agency origins of insider trading
title_fullStr The agency origins of insider trading
title_full_unstemmed The agency origins of insider trading
title_sort agency origins of insider trading
publisher AOSIS
series South African Journal of Business Management
issn 2078-5585
2078-5976
publishDate 1991-12-01
description Insider trading has been a topical issue in recent times. While the debate regarding insider trading usually extends to economic and ethical arguments in favour of or against the practice, in this article we attempt to ascertain the causes of the practice. The origins of insider trading are traced to the separation of ownership and control. It has been argued that insider trading is beneficial to minority shareholders and reduces the agency cost problem; this is shown to be fallacious. The authors conclude that insider trading is an agency problem and that the disciplinary mechanisms described in the literature do not inhibit the phenomena, indeed some of these mechanisms actually facilitate the occurrence of insider trading. This it is argued provides the rationale for government intervention and anti-insider trading legislation. Binnekringtransaksies het onlangs heelwat opspraak gewek. Die debat oor binnekringtransaksies bestaan hoofsaaklik uit die aanvoer van ekonomiese of etiese argumente vir of teen die praktyk. In hierdie artikel word gepoog om die oorsake van hierdie praktyk vas te stel. Die oorsprong van binnekringtransaksies word teruggevoer na die skeiding van eienaarskap en beheer. Daar is al aangevoer dat binnekringtransaksies tot die voordeel van minderheidsaandeelhouers strek, aangesien dit die agentskapsprobleem verminder, maar in hierdie artikel word aangetoon dat dit nie die geval is nie. Die skrywers kom tot die gevolgtrekking dat binnekringtransaksies 'n agentskapsprobleem is en dat die meganismes, wat volgens die literatuur hierdie praktyk aan bande behoort te le, dit in werklikheid vergemaklik. Daar word ook aangevoer dat die beweegrede vir optrede deur die staat, asook wetgewing om binnekringtransaksies te bekamp, hieruit voortspruit.
url https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/905
work_keys_str_mv AT sinclairdavidson theagencyoriginsofinsidertrading
AT davidsolomon theagencyoriginsofinsidertrading
AT sinclairdavidson agencyoriginsofinsidertrading
AT davidsolomon agencyoriginsofinsidertrading
_version_ 1724306125691551744