Clinical efficacy and problems with CT lymphography in identifying the sentinel node in breast cancer

• Main Authors: Hirose Toshiyuki, Taki Masako, Hisaoka Sonoka, Hirose Chieko, Sasa Mitsunori, Takahashi Masako, Bando Yoshimi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2008-06-01
• Series: World Journal of Surgical Oncology
• Online Access: http://www.wjso.com/content/6/1/57

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Combining a radioisotope with a dye-guided method is the best method for identification of the sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) in breast cancer. However, some institutions are limited to use of a dye-guided method alone. Recently, computed tomographic lymphography (CTLG) employing a nonionic contrast medium has achieved SN identification.</p> <p>Patients and methods</p> <p>218 patients with primary breast cancer and no clinical evidence of lymph node metastasis were studied. SN identification was performed by CTLG and a dye-guided method. The SN identification rate was analyzed for correlations with the clinicopathological findings.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The SN identification rates were 96% with CTLG, 92% with the dye-guided method and 99% with both methods combined. The identification rates with CTLG and the combined method were significantly lower in node-positive patients compared to node-negative patients, and significantly lower with the combined method in vascular invasion-positive patients compared to negative patients. In addition, the SN identification rate with the dye-guided method was significantly lower in patients with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 25, whereas the BMI did not affect the identification rate with CTLG or the combined method. Multiple SNs were detected in approximately 20% of the patients.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Combined performance of CTLG and a dye-guided method enables identification of SNs prior to breast cancer surgery. That SN identification is easier compared with by the dye-guided method alone, and the identification rate is improved compared with either method alone. The combination of methods was especially useful in obese patients. For patients with multiple SNs, the combination has the further advantage of enabling accurate SN biopsy. CTLG may yield false-negative findings in node-positive patients and patients with lymph vessel obstruction.</p>