Implementation and evaluation of segmentation algorithms according to multimodal imaging in personalized medicine

Multimodal imaging is gaining in importance in the field of personalized medicine and can be described as a current trend in medical imaging diagnostics. The segmentation, classification and analysis of tissue structures is essential. The goal of this study is the evaluation of established segmentat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stich Manuel, Vogt Jeannine, Lindner Michaela, Ringler Ralf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2017-09-01
Series:Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2017-0178
id doaj-b6a41eaa437a4cf4b8aa19c067c43cfc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b6a41eaa437a4cf4b8aa19c067c43cfc2021-09-06T19:19:25ZengDe GruyterCurrent Directions in Biomedical Engineering2364-55042017-09-013220721010.1515/cdbme-2017-0178cdbme-2017-0178Implementation and evaluation of segmentation algorithms according to multimodal imaging in personalized medicineStich Manuel0Vogt Jeannine1Lindner Michaela2Ringler Ralf3Institute for diagnostic and interventional radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, GermanyX-Ray & Nuclear Imaging Lab, Institute for Medical Engineering, Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden (OTH), 92637 Weiden, GermanyX-Ray & Nuclear Imaging Lab, Institute for Medical Engineering, Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden (OTH), 92637 Weiden, GermanyX-Ray & Nuclear Imaging Lab, Institute for Medical Engineering, Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden (OTH), 92637 Weiden, GermanyMultimodal imaging is gaining in importance in the field of personalized medicine and can be described as a current trend in medical imaging diagnostics. The segmentation, classification and analysis of tissue structures is essential. The goal of this study is the evaluation of established segmentation methods on different medical image data sets acquired with different diagnostic procedures. Established segmentation methods were implemented using the latest state of the art and applied to medical image data sets. In order to benchmark the segmentation performance quantitatively, medical image data sets were superimposed with artificial Gaussian noise, and the mis-segmentation as a function of the image SNR or CNR was compared to a gold standard. The evaluation of the image segmentation showed that the best results of pixel-based segmentation (< 3%) can be achieved with methods of machine learning, multithreshold and advanced level-set method - even at high artificial noise (SNR< 18). Finally, the complexity of the object geometry and the contrast of the ROI to the surrounding tissue must also be considered to select the best segmentation algorithm.https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2017-0178contextual methodsimage segmentationmachine learningmedical imagesradiology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stich Manuel
Vogt Jeannine
Lindner Michaela
Ringler Ralf
spellingShingle Stich Manuel
Vogt Jeannine
Lindner Michaela
Ringler Ralf
Implementation and evaluation of segmentation algorithms according to multimodal imaging in personalized medicine
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
contextual methods
image segmentation
machine learning
medical images
radiology
author_facet Stich Manuel
Vogt Jeannine
Lindner Michaela
Ringler Ralf
author_sort Stich Manuel
title Implementation and evaluation of segmentation algorithms according to multimodal imaging in personalized medicine
title_short Implementation and evaluation of segmentation algorithms according to multimodal imaging in personalized medicine
title_full Implementation and evaluation of segmentation algorithms according to multimodal imaging in personalized medicine
title_fullStr Implementation and evaluation of segmentation algorithms according to multimodal imaging in personalized medicine
title_full_unstemmed Implementation and evaluation of segmentation algorithms according to multimodal imaging in personalized medicine
title_sort implementation and evaluation of segmentation algorithms according to multimodal imaging in personalized medicine
publisher De Gruyter
series Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
issn 2364-5504
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Multimodal imaging is gaining in importance in the field of personalized medicine and can be described as a current trend in medical imaging diagnostics. The segmentation, classification and analysis of tissue structures is essential. The goal of this study is the evaluation of established segmentation methods on different medical image data sets acquired with different diagnostic procedures. Established segmentation methods were implemented using the latest state of the art and applied to medical image data sets. In order to benchmark the segmentation performance quantitatively, medical image data sets were superimposed with artificial Gaussian noise, and the mis-segmentation as a function of the image SNR or CNR was compared to a gold standard. The evaluation of the image segmentation showed that the best results of pixel-based segmentation (< 3%) can be achieved with methods of machine learning, multithreshold and advanced level-set method - even at high artificial noise (SNR< 18). Finally, the complexity of the object geometry and the contrast of the ROI to the surrounding tissue must also be considered to select the best segmentation algorithm.
topic contextual methods
image segmentation
machine learning
medical images
radiology
url https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2017-0178
work_keys_str_mv AT stichmanuel implementationandevaluationofsegmentationalgorithmsaccordingtomultimodalimaginginpersonalizedmedicine
AT vogtjeannine implementationandevaluationofsegmentationalgorithmsaccordingtomultimodalimaginginpersonalizedmedicine
AT lindnermichaela implementationandevaluationofsegmentationalgorithmsaccordingtomultimodalimaginginpersonalizedmedicine
AT ringlerralf implementationandevaluationofsegmentationalgorithmsaccordingtomultimodalimaginginpersonalizedmedicine
_version_ 1717778636435619840