CBCT analysis of impacted maxillary canines

Background: This study designed to shade light on the important role of CBCT in accurate localization of the impacted maxillary canines. Materials and method: Fifty two unilateral and bilateral impacted maxillary canines from 30 patients (24 females and 6 males) were evaluated by a volumetric 3D ima...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zainab H Al-Ghurabi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: College of Dentistry/ University of Baghdad 2014-02-01
Series:Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry
Online Access:https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/238
id doaj-b6a3fac4e5bf44a1b830fccb8225686e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b6a3fac4e5bf44a1b830fccb8225686e2021-09-02T21:58:17ZengCollege of Dentistry/ University of BaghdadJournal of Baghdad College of Dentistry2311-52702014-02-01252CBCT analysis of impacted maxillary canines Zainab H Al-GhurabiBackground: This study designed to shade light on the important role of CBCT in accurate localization of the impacted maxillary canines. Materials and method: Fifty two unilateral and bilateral impacted maxillary canines from 30 patients (24 females and 6 males) were evaluated by a volumetric 3D images obtained from cone beam CT. All samples attended to the specialist health center of dentistry in Al-Sadder City referred to CBCT by oral surgeons or orthodontists to detect the exact position of impacted upper canine in cases when there was no bulging buccally or palatally which aids to detect the exact position. Results: Mesio-palatal angulations had the highest rate (63.5%) followed by mesio-labial (19.2%), vertical (labial) (9.6%), disto-palatal (5.8%) and disto-labial (1.9%). The relation between impacted canine and the adjacent teeth regarding to the attachment was significant only with lateral incisor. No cases of root resorption of the adjacent teeth were recorded. Bilateral impacted teeth were found in 22 patients which is highly significant (especially in females), while unilateral impaction was found only in 8 patients especially in females. Impacted canine was more prominent in female whether unilateral or bilateral. Conclusions: CBCT imaging of impacted canines can show the following: presence or absence of the canine, angulations of the long axis of the tooth, relative labial and palatal positions and proximity to adjacent teeth. In short, CBCT imaging is clearly advantageous in imaging and management of impacted canines. https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/238
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zainab H Al-Ghurabi
spellingShingle Zainab H Al-Ghurabi
CBCT analysis of impacted maxillary canines
Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry
author_facet Zainab H Al-Ghurabi
author_sort Zainab H Al-Ghurabi
title CBCT analysis of impacted maxillary canines
title_short CBCT analysis of impacted maxillary canines
title_full CBCT analysis of impacted maxillary canines
title_fullStr CBCT analysis of impacted maxillary canines
title_full_unstemmed CBCT analysis of impacted maxillary canines
title_sort cbct analysis of impacted maxillary canines
publisher College of Dentistry/ University of Baghdad
series Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry
issn 2311-5270
publishDate 2014-02-01
description Background: This study designed to shade light on the important role of CBCT in accurate localization of the impacted maxillary canines. Materials and method: Fifty two unilateral and bilateral impacted maxillary canines from 30 patients (24 females and 6 males) were evaluated by a volumetric 3D images obtained from cone beam CT. All samples attended to the specialist health center of dentistry in Al-Sadder City referred to CBCT by oral surgeons or orthodontists to detect the exact position of impacted upper canine in cases when there was no bulging buccally or palatally which aids to detect the exact position. Results: Mesio-palatal angulations had the highest rate (63.5%) followed by mesio-labial (19.2%), vertical (labial) (9.6%), disto-palatal (5.8%) and disto-labial (1.9%). The relation between impacted canine and the adjacent teeth regarding to the attachment was significant only with lateral incisor. No cases of root resorption of the adjacent teeth were recorded. Bilateral impacted teeth were found in 22 patients which is highly significant (especially in females), while unilateral impaction was found only in 8 patients especially in females. Impacted canine was more prominent in female whether unilateral or bilateral. Conclusions: CBCT imaging of impacted canines can show the following: presence or absence of the canine, angulations of the long axis of the tooth, relative labial and palatal positions and proximity to adjacent teeth. In short, CBCT imaging is clearly advantageous in imaging and management of impacted canines.
url https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/238
work_keys_str_mv AT zainabhalghurabi cbctanalysisofimpactedmaxillarycanines
_version_ 1717819040098942976