Association of performance in a stair-climbing test with complications and survival after lung cancer resection in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery era: population-based outcomes

Introduction With a population-based cohort in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) era, we aimed to evaluate the value of the stair-climbing test (SCT) on short- and long-term outcomes of lung cancer surgery. Methods All patients operated due to primary lung cancer in Central Finland and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olli Helminen, Johanna Valo, Heidi Andersen, Johan Söderström, Eero Sihvo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Respiratory Society 2021-08-01
Series:ERJ Open Research
Online Access:http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/7/3/00110-2021.full
id doaj-b69f8fc0a38c44e0a7ce4143813db797
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b69f8fc0a38c44e0a7ce4143813db7972021-10-04T13:41:20ZengEuropean Respiratory SocietyERJ Open Research2312-05412021-08-017310.1183/23120541.00110-202100110-2021Association of performance in a stair-climbing test with complications and survival after lung cancer resection in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery era: population-based outcomesOlli Helminen0Johanna Valo1Heidi Andersen2Johan Söderström3Eero Sihvo4 Dept of Surgery, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland Dept of Surgery, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland Dept of Pulmonology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland Dept of Pulmonology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland Dept of Surgery, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland Introduction With a population-based cohort in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) era, we aimed to evaluate the value of the stair-climbing test (SCT) on short- and long-term outcomes of lung cancer surgery. Methods All patients operated due to primary lung cancer in Central Finland and Ostrobothnia from 2013 to June 2020 were included. For the analysis, clinical variables including the outcome of SCT and cause-specific mortality were available. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between <11 m (n=66) and >12 m SCT (n=217) groups. Results Patients with poor performance (<11 m) had more comorbidities and worse lung function but did not differ in tumour stage or treatment. No differences between groups were observed in major morbidity rate (10.6% versus 11.1%, p=0.918) or median hospital stay (5 (IQR 4–7) versus 4 (IQR 3–7), p=0.179). At 1-year, fewer patients were alive and living at home in the climbing <11 m group (81.3%) compared to the >12 m group (94.2%), p=0.002. No difference was observed in cancer-specific 5-year survival. Non-cancer-specific survival (62.9% versus 83.1%, p<0.001) and overall survival (49.9% versus 70.0%, p<0.001) were worse in the <11 m group. After adjustment for confounding factors, SCT remained as a significant predictor for non-cancer-specific (HR 4.28; 95% CI 2.10–8.73) and overall mortality (HR 2.38; 95% CI 1.43–3.98). Conclusions With SCT-based exercise testing, VATS can be performed safely, with a similar major morbidity rate in the poor performance group (<11 m) compared to >12 m group. Poor exercise performance increases non-cancer-specific mortality. Being a major predictor of survival, exercise capacity should be included in prognostic models.http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/7/3/00110-2021.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olli Helminen
Johanna Valo
Heidi Andersen
Johan Söderström
Eero Sihvo
spellingShingle Olli Helminen
Johanna Valo
Heidi Andersen
Johan Söderström
Eero Sihvo
Association of performance in a stair-climbing test with complications and survival after lung cancer resection in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery era: population-based outcomes
ERJ Open Research
author_facet Olli Helminen
Johanna Valo
Heidi Andersen
Johan Söderström
Eero Sihvo
author_sort Olli Helminen
title Association of performance in a stair-climbing test with complications and survival after lung cancer resection in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery era: population-based outcomes
title_short Association of performance in a stair-climbing test with complications and survival after lung cancer resection in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery era: population-based outcomes
title_full Association of performance in a stair-climbing test with complications and survival after lung cancer resection in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery era: population-based outcomes
title_fullStr Association of performance in a stair-climbing test with complications and survival after lung cancer resection in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery era: population-based outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Association of performance in a stair-climbing test with complications and survival after lung cancer resection in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery era: population-based outcomes
title_sort association of performance in a stair-climbing test with complications and survival after lung cancer resection in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery era: population-based outcomes
publisher European Respiratory Society
series ERJ Open Research
issn 2312-0541
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Introduction With a population-based cohort in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) era, we aimed to evaluate the value of the stair-climbing test (SCT) on short- and long-term outcomes of lung cancer surgery. Methods All patients operated due to primary lung cancer in Central Finland and Ostrobothnia from 2013 to June 2020 were included. For the analysis, clinical variables including the outcome of SCT and cause-specific mortality were available. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between <11 m (n=66) and >12 m SCT (n=217) groups. Results Patients with poor performance (<11 m) had more comorbidities and worse lung function but did not differ in tumour stage or treatment. No differences between groups were observed in major morbidity rate (10.6% versus 11.1%, p=0.918) or median hospital stay (5 (IQR 4–7) versus 4 (IQR 3–7), p=0.179). At 1-year, fewer patients were alive and living at home in the climbing <11 m group (81.3%) compared to the >12 m group (94.2%), p=0.002. No difference was observed in cancer-specific 5-year survival. Non-cancer-specific survival (62.9% versus 83.1%, p<0.001) and overall survival (49.9% versus 70.0%, p<0.001) were worse in the <11 m group. After adjustment for confounding factors, SCT remained as a significant predictor for non-cancer-specific (HR 4.28; 95% CI 2.10–8.73) and overall mortality (HR 2.38; 95% CI 1.43–3.98). Conclusions With SCT-based exercise testing, VATS can be performed safely, with a similar major morbidity rate in the poor performance group (<11 m) compared to >12 m group. Poor exercise performance increases non-cancer-specific mortality. Being a major predictor of survival, exercise capacity should be included in prognostic models.
url http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/7/3/00110-2021.full
work_keys_str_mv AT ollihelminen associationofperformanceinastairclimbingtestwithcomplicationsandsurvivalafterlungcancerresectioninthevideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryerapopulationbasedoutcomes
AT johannavalo associationofperformanceinastairclimbingtestwithcomplicationsandsurvivalafterlungcancerresectioninthevideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryerapopulationbasedoutcomes
AT heidiandersen associationofperformanceinastairclimbingtestwithcomplicationsandsurvivalafterlungcancerresectioninthevideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryerapopulationbasedoutcomes
AT johansoderstrom associationofperformanceinastairclimbingtestwithcomplicationsandsurvivalafterlungcancerresectioninthevideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryerapopulationbasedoutcomes
AT eerosihvo associationofperformanceinastairclimbingtestwithcomplicationsandsurvivalafterlungcancerresectioninthevideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryerapopulationbasedoutcomes
_version_ 1716844078394507264