The Effectiveness of Dipstick for the Detection of Urinary Tract Infection

Background. The balance between the choices of UTI diagnostic tools in most primary care settings has been settled for by the more rapid, less labour-intensive dipstick. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dipstick for diagnosing UTI. Method. A total of 429 urine samples were collected...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isaac Dadzie, Elvis Quansah, Mavis Puopelle Dakorah, Victoria Abiade, Ebenezer Takyi-Amuah, Richmond Adusei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8642628
id doaj-b696ccce53ed4586b85cf33395ec2bc4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b696ccce53ed4586b85cf33395ec2bc42021-07-02T12:40:14ZengHindawi LimitedCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology1712-95321918-14932019-01-01201910.1155/2019/86426288642628The Effectiveness of Dipstick for the Detection of Urinary Tract InfectionIsaac Dadzie0Elvis Quansah1Mavis Puopelle Dakorah2Victoria Abiade3Ebenezer Takyi-Amuah4Richmond Adusei5Department of Medical Laboratory Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, GhanaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, GhanaCape Coast Teaching Hospital, Cape Coast, GhanaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, GhanaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, GhanaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, GhanaBackground. The balance between the choices of UTI diagnostic tools in most primary care settings has been settled for by the more rapid, less labour-intensive dipstick. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dipstick for diagnosing UTI. Method. A total of 429 urine samples were collected from patients suspected of UTI; cultured on cysteine-lactose-electrolyte-deficient (CLED) agar, blood agar, and MacConkey agar; and incubated at 37°C overnight. Urine cultures with bacteria count ≥105 cfu/ml were classified as “positive” for UTI. A dipstick was used to screen for the production of nitrite (NIT) and leucocyte esterase (LE), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Biochemical reactions of nitrite and leucocyte esterase > “trace” were classified as “positive.” A quantitative urine culture was used as the gold standard. Results. The highest sensitivity value and negative predictive value were recorded for the combined “NIT+ or LE+” dipstick results. The highest specificity value, positive predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were recorded for “nitrite-positive and leucocyte esterase-positive” results. Combined “nitrite-positive or leucocyte-positive” result was relatively the best indicator for accurate dipstick diagnosis, with AUC = 0.7242. Cohen’s kappa values between dipstick diagnosis and quantitative culture were <0.6. Conclusion. Combined performance of nitrite and leucocyte esterase results appeared better than the solo performance of nitrite and leucocyte esterase. However, little confidence should be placed on dipstick diagnosis; hence, request for quantity culture should be encouraged in the primary healthcare settings.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8642628
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Isaac Dadzie
Elvis Quansah
Mavis Puopelle Dakorah
Victoria Abiade
Ebenezer Takyi-Amuah
Richmond Adusei
spellingShingle Isaac Dadzie
Elvis Quansah
Mavis Puopelle Dakorah
Victoria Abiade
Ebenezer Takyi-Amuah
Richmond Adusei
The Effectiveness of Dipstick for the Detection of Urinary Tract Infection
Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
author_facet Isaac Dadzie
Elvis Quansah
Mavis Puopelle Dakorah
Victoria Abiade
Ebenezer Takyi-Amuah
Richmond Adusei
author_sort Isaac Dadzie
title The Effectiveness of Dipstick for the Detection of Urinary Tract Infection
title_short The Effectiveness of Dipstick for the Detection of Urinary Tract Infection
title_full The Effectiveness of Dipstick for the Detection of Urinary Tract Infection
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of Dipstick for the Detection of Urinary Tract Infection
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of Dipstick for the Detection of Urinary Tract Infection
title_sort effectiveness of dipstick for the detection of urinary tract infection
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
issn 1712-9532
1918-1493
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Background. The balance between the choices of UTI diagnostic tools in most primary care settings has been settled for by the more rapid, less labour-intensive dipstick. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dipstick for diagnosing UTI. Method. A total of 429 urine samples were collected from patients suspected of UTI; cultured on cysteine-lactose-electrolyte-deficient (CLED) agar, blood agar, and MacConkey agar; and incubated at 37°C overnight. Urine cultures with bacteria count ≥105 cfu/ml were classified as “positive” for UTI. A dipstick was used to screen for the production of nitrite (NIT) and leucocyte esterase (LE), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Biochemical reactions of nitrite and leucocyte esterase > “trace” were classified as “positive.” A quantitative urine culture was used as the gold standard. Results. The highest sensitivity value and negative predictive value were recorded for the combined “NIT+ or LE+” dipstick results. The highest specificity value, positive predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were recorded for “nitrite-positive and leucocyte esterase-positive” results. Combined “nitrite-positive or leucocyte-positive” result was relatively the best indicator for accurate dipstick diagnosis, with AUC = 0.7242. Cohen’s kappa values between dipstick diagnosis and quantitative culture were <0.6. Conclusion. Combined performance of nitrite and leucocyte esterase results appeared better than the solo performance of nitrite and leucocyte esterase. However, little confidence should be placed on dipstick diagnosis; hence, request for quantity culture should be encouraged in the primary healthcare settings.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8642628
work_keys_str_mv AT isaacdadzie theeffectivenessofdipstickforthedetectionofurinarytractinfection
AT elvisquansah theeffectivenessofdipstickforthedetectionofurinarytractinfection
AT mavispuopelledakorah theeffectivenessofdipstickforthedetectionofurinarytractinfection
AT victoriaabiade theeffectivenessofdipstickforthedetectionofurinarytractinfection
AT ebenezertakyiamuah theeffectivenessofdipstickforthedetectionofurinarytractinfection
AT richmondadusei theeffectivenessofdipstickforthedetectionofurinarytractinfection
AT isaacdadzie effectivenessofdipstickforthedetectionofurinarytractinfection
AT elvisquansah effectivenessofdipstickforthedetectionofurinarytractinfection
AT mavispuopelledakorah effectivenessofdipstickforthedetectionofurinarytractinfection
AT victoriaabiade effectivenessofdipstickforthedetectionofurinarytractinfection
AT ebenezertakyiamuah effectivenessofdipstickforthedetectionofurinarytractinfection
AT richmondadusei effectivenessofdipstickforthedetectionofurinarytractinfection
_version_ 1721329954133639168