To Make Good Decision: A Group DSS for Multiple Criteria Alternative Rank and Selection

Decision making is a recursive process and usually involves multiple decision criteria. However, such multiple criteria decision making may have a problem in which partial decision criteria may conflict with each other. An information technology, such as the decision support system (DSS) and group D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen-Shu Wang, Heng-Li Yang, Shiang-Lin Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/186970
id doaj-b687f915c7e44e70982a848a7712b61b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b687f915c7e44e70982a848a7712b61b2020-11-24T21:40:27ZengHindawi LimitedMathematical Problems in Engineering1024-123X1563-51472015-01-01201510.1155/2015/186970186970To Make Good Decision: A Group DSS for Multiple Criteria Alternative Rank and SelectionChen-Shu Wang0Heng-Li Yang1Shiang-Lin Lin2Graduate Institute of Information Management, National Taipei University of Technology, TaiwanDepartment of Management Information Systems, National Chengchi University, TaiwanDepartment of Management Information Systems, National Chengchi University, TaiwanDecision making is a recursive process and usually involves multiple decision criteria. However, such multiple criteria decision making may have a problem in which partial decision criteria may conflict with each other. An information technology, such as the decision support system (DSS) and group DSS (GDSS), emerges to assist decision maker for decision-making process. Both the DSS and GDSS should integrate with a symmetrical approach to assist decision maker to take all decision criteria into consideration simultaneously. This study proposes a GDSS architecture named hybrid decision-making support model (HDMSM) and integrated four decision approaches (Delphi, DEMATEL, ANP, and MDS) to help decision maker to rank and select appropriate alternatives. The HDMSM consists of five steps, namely, criteria identification, criteria correlation calculation, criteria evaluation, critical criteria selection, and alternative rank and comparison. Finally, to validate the proposed feasibility of the proposed model, this study also conducts a case study to find out the important indexes of corporate social responsibility (CSR) from multiple perspectives. As the case study demonstrates the proposed HDMSM enables a group of decision makers to implement the MCDM effectively and help them to analyze the relation and degree of mutual influence among different evaluation factors.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/186970
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chen-Shu Wang
Heng-Li Yang
Shiang-Lin Lin
spellingShingle Chen-Shu Wang
Heng-Li Yang
Shiang-Lin Lin
To Make Good Decision: A Group DSS for Multiple Criteria Alternative Rank and Selection
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
author_facet Chen-Shu Wang
Heng-Li Yang
Shiang-Lin Lin
author_sort Chen-Shu Wang
title To Make Good Decision: A Group DSS for Multiple Criteria Alternative Rank and Selection
title_short To Make Good Decision: A Group DSS for Multiple Criteria Alternative Rank and Selection
title_full To Make Good Decision: A Group DSS for Multiple Criteria Alternative Rank and Selection
title_fullStr To Make Good Decision: A Group DSS for Multiple Criteria Alternative Rank and Selection
title_full_unstemmed To Make Good Decision: A Group DSS for Multiple Criteria Alternative Rank and Selection
title_sort to make good decision: a group dss for multiple criteria alternative rank and selection
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Mathematical Problems in Engineering
issn 1024-123X
1563-5147
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Decision making is a recursive process and usually involves multiple decision criteria. However, such multiple criteria decision making may have a problem in which partial decision criteria may conflict with each other. An information technology, such as the decision support system (DSS) and group DSS (GDSS), emerges to assist decision maker for decision-making process. Both the DSS and GDSS should integrate with a symmetrical approach to assist decision maker to take all decision criteria into consideration simultaneously. This study proposes a GDSS architecture named hybrid decision-making support model (HDMSM) and integrated four decision approaches (Delphi, DEMATEL, ANP, and MDS) to help decision maker to rank and select appropriate alternatives. The HDMSM consists of five steps, namely, criteria identification, criteria correlation calculation, criteria evaluation, critical criteria selection, and alternative rank and comparison. Finally, to validate the proposed feasibility of the proposed model, this study also conducts a case study to find out the important indexes of corporate social responsibility (CSR) from multiple perspectives. As the case study demonstrates the proposed HDMSM enables a group of decision makers to implement the MCDM effectively and help them to analyze the relation and degree of mutual influence among different evaluation factors.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/186970
work_keys_str_mv AT chenshuwang tomakegooddecisionagroupdssformultiplecriteriaalternativerankandselection
AT hengliyang tomakegooddecisionagroupdssformultiplecriteriaalternativerankandselection
AT shianglinlin tomakegooddecisionagroupdssformultiplecriteriaalternativerankandselection
_version_ 1725925712796319744