OS MELHORES E OS PIORES: O BOCA A BOCA EM SITES DE VAREJO ELETRÔNICO

This paper aims to investigate the internal dimensions of Word-of-Mouth (WOM) behavior, comparing the best and the worst Brazilian e-tail websites in four dimensions: intensity, positive valence, negative valence and content. The research used for this paper is based on the multidimensional framewor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabrício de Carvalho Inocêncio, Érico Veras Marques
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Fundação Getulio Vargas 2016-09-01
Series:RAE: Revista de Administração de Empresas
Subjects:
Online Access:http://rae.fgv.br/sites/rae.fgv.br/files/os_melhores_e_os_piores_o_boca_a_boca_em_sites_de_varejo_eletronico_0.pdf
id doaj-b686b5949337432588e66d962e6a99e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b686b5949337432588e66d962e6a99e62020-11-24T22:31:26ZengFundação Getulio VargasRAE: Revista de Administração de Empresas 0034-75902178-938X2016-09-01565518532OS MELHORES E OS PIORES: O BOCA A BOCA EM SITES DE VAREJO ELETRÔNICOFabrício de Carvalho Inocêncio0 Érico Veras Marques1Doutorando em Administração de Empresas pela Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo – São Paulo – SP, BrasilProfessor da Universidade Federal do Ceará, Faculdade de Economia Administração Atuária e Contabilidade – Fortaleza – CE, BrasilThis paper aims to investigate the internal dimensions of Word-of-Mouth (WOM) behavior, comparing the best and the worst Brazilian e-tail websites in four dimensions: intensity, positive valence, negative valence and content. The research used for this paper is based on the multidimensional framework of Goyette, Ricard, Bergeron, and Marticotte (2010). It suggests that WOM intensity is higher in the case of the best websites, while the degree of promotion (positive valence) of the best websites is lower than the degree of detraction (negative valence) of the worst websites. This result supports previous findings, showing that negative WOM is passionate and extreme. Yet, elements such as trust, delivery time and post-purchase support, reinforce both positive WOM in the best websites and negative WOM in the worst websites. However, security of transaction and ease of use do not reinforce negative WOM in the worst websites, suggesting a certain degree of commoditization of such factors between the best and the worst websites.http://rae.fgv.br/sites/rae.fgv.br/files/os_melhores_e_os_piores_o_boca_a_boca_em_sites_de_varejo_eletronico_0.pdfE-commercee-tailword-of-mouthstructural equation modelingonline consumer behavior
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fabrício de Carvalho Inocêncio
Érico Veras Marques
spellingShingle Fabrício de Carvalho Inocêncio
Érico Veras Marques
OS MELHORES E OS PIORES: O BOCA A BOCA EM SITES DE VAREJO ELETRÔNICO
RAE: Revista de Administração de Empresas
E-commerce
e-tail
word-of-mouth
structural equation modeling
online consumer behavior
author_facet Fabrício de Carvalho Inocêncio
Érico Veras Marques
author_sort Fabrício de Carvalho Inocêncio
title OS MELHORES E OS PIORES: O BOCA A BOCA EM SITES DE VAREJO ELETRÔNICO
title_short OS MELHORES E OS PIORES: O BOCA A BOCA EM SITES DE VAREJO ELETRÔNICO
title_full OS MELHORES E OS PIORES: O BOCA A BOCA EM SITES DE VAREJO ELETRÔNICO
title_fullStr OS MELHORES E OS PIORES: O BOCA A BOCA EM SITES DE VAREJO ELETRÔNICO
title_full_unstemmed OS MELHORES E OS PIORES: O BOCA A BOCA EM SITES DE VAREJO ELETRÔNICO
title_sort os melhores e os piores: o boca a boca em sites de varejo eletrônico
publisher Fundação Getulio Vargas
series RAE: Revista de Administração de Empresas
issn 0034-7590
2178-938X
publishDate 2016-09-01
description This paper aims to investigate the internal dimensions of Word-of-Mouth (WOM) behavior, comparing the best and the worst Brazilian e-tail websites in four dimensions: intensity, positive valence, negative valence and content. The research used for this paper is based on the multidimensional framework of Goyette, Ricard, Bergeron, and Marticotte (2010). It suggests that WOM intensity is higher in the case of the best websites, while the degree of promotion (positive valence) of the best websites is lower than the degree of detraction (negative valence) of the worst websites. This result supports previous findings, showing that negative WOM is passionate and extreme. Yet, elements such as trust, delivery time and post-purchase support, reinforce both positive WOM in the best websites and negative WOM in the worst websites. However, security of transaction and ease of use do not reinforce negative WOM in the worst websites, suggesting a certain degree of commoditization of such factors between the best and the worst websites.
topic E-commerce
e-tail
word-of-mouth
structural equation modeling
online consumer behavior
url http://rae.fgv.br/sites/rae.fgv.br/files/os_melhores_e_os_piores_o_boca_a_boca_em_sites_de_varejo_eletronico_0.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fabriciodecarvalhoinocencio osmelhoreseospioresobocaabocaemsitesdevarejoeletronico
AT ericoverasmarques osmelhoreseospioresobocaabocaemsitesdevarejoeletronico
_version_ 1725737142549741568