Response Time to a Vibrotactile Stimulus Presented on the Foot at Rest and During Walking on Different Surfaces

This study investigates the simple reaction time (SRT) and response time (RT) to a vibrotactile stimulus presented on two body locations at the lower extremity of the foot on different types of surface during walking. We determined RTs while walking on Concrete, Foam, Sand, and gravel surface. Also,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Landry Delphin Chapwouo Tchakouté, Louis Tremblay, Bob-Antoine J. Menelas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-06-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/7/2088
id doaj-b681f52d2e504110bb055b74a0d22713
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b681f52d2e504110bb055b74a0d227132020-11-25T01:53:23ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202018-06-01187208810.3390/s18072088s18072088Response Time to a Vibrotactile Stimulus Presented on the Foot at Rest and During Walking on Different SurfacesLandry Delphin Chapwouo Tchakouté0Louis Tremblay1Bob-Antoine J. Menelas2Department of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of Quebec at Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC G7H 2B1, CanadaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Quebec at Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC G7H 2B1, CanadaDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of Quebec at Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC G7H 2B1, CanadaThis study investigates the simple reaction time (SRT) and response time (RT) to a vibrotactile stimulus presented on two body locations at the lower extremity of the foot on different types of surface during walking. We determined RTs while walking on Concrete, Foam, Sand, and gravel surface. Also, for RT, we evaluated two vibrotactile stimulus (VS) locations on the lower extremity: the ankle (AL) and under the foot plantar (FP). A total of 21 young adult participants (n = 21), aged mean 24 ± 2.9 years, took part in a two-session experiment with two main conditions (at rest and while walking on four types of surface). The control session included 2016 repeated measures, with one-way and two-way ANOVA analyses. The findings have consistently revealed slowness of RT to VS, in particular on sand and gravel surface. In addition, we found that body location has a significant effect on RT in certain surfaces. These results showed that RTs increased with environment changes during the performance of dual tasks.http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/7/2088reaction timeresponse timefootvibrotactile stimuliwearable deviceenactive shoetype of surface
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Landry Delphin Chapwouo Tchakouté
Louis Tremblay
Bob-Antoine J. Menelas
spellingShingle Landry Delphin Chapwouo Tchakouté
Louis Tremblay
Bob-Antoine J. Menelas
Response Time to a Vibrotactile Stimulus Presented on the Foot at Rest and During Walking on Different Surfaces
Sensors
reaction time
response time
foot
vibrotactile stimuli
wearable device
enactive shoe
type of surface
author_facet Landry Delphin Chapwouo Tchakouté
Louis Tremblay
Bob-Antoine J. Menelas
author_sort Landry Delphin Chapwouo Tchakouté
title Response Time to a Vibrotactile Stimulus Presented on the Foot at Rest and During Walking on Different Surfaces
title_short Response Time to a Vibrotactile Stimulus Presented on the Foot at Rest and During Walking on Different Surfaces
title_full Response Time to a Vibrotactile Stimulus Presented on the Foot at Rest and During Walking on Different Surfaces
title_fullStr Response Time to a Vibrotactile Stimulus Presented on the Foot at Rest and During Walking on Different Surfaces
title_full_unstemmed Response Time to a Vibrotactile Stimulus Presented on the Foot at Rest and During Walking on Different Surfaces
title_sort response time to a vibrotactile stimulus presented on the foot at rest and during walking on different surfaces
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2018-06-01
description This study investigates the simple reaction time (SRT) and response time (RT) to a vibrotactile stimulus presented on two body locations at the lower extremity of the foot on different types of surface during walking. We determined RTs while walking on Concrete, Foam, Sand, and gravel surface. Also, for RT, we evaluated two vibrotactile stimulus (VS) locations on the lower extremity: the ankle (AL) and under the foot plantar (FP). A total of 21 young adult participants (n = 21), aged mean 24 ± 2.9 years, took part in a two-session experiment with two main conditions (at rest and while walking on four types of surface). The control session included 2016 repeated measures, with one-way and two-way ANOVA analyses. The findings have consistently revealed slowness of RT to VS, in particular on sand and gravel surface. In addition, we found that body location has a significant effect on RT in certain surfaces. These results showed that RTs increased with environment changes during the performance of dual tasks.
topic reaction time
response time
foot
vibrotactile stimuli
wearable device
enactive shoe
type of surface
url http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/7/2088
work_keys_str_mv AT landrydelphinchapwouotchakoute responsetimetoavibrotactilestimuluspresentedonthefootatrestandduringwalkingondifferentsurfaces
AT louistremblay responsetimetoavibrotactilestimuluspresentedonthefootatrestandduringwalkingondifferentsurfaces
AT bobantoinejmenelas responsetimetoavibrotactilestimuluspresentedonthefootatrestandduringwalkingondifferentsurfaces
_version_ 1724991215087124480