Comparative study of anaesthesia induction in obese dogs using propofol dosages based on lean body weight or total body weight

The objective of this study was to compare the dosages for anesthesia induction in obese dogs using propofol based on lean body weight or total body weight. For this purpose, seven dogs with ideal body condition score (BCS) (BCS 4-5; 17.3 ± 2.5% fat mass) were included in the control group (CG), sev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernanda Corrêa Devito, Geni Cristina Fonseca Patricio, Patrícia Bonifácio Flôr, Thiago Henrique Annibale Vendramini, Andressa Rodrigues Amaral, Karina Pfrimer, Marcio Antonio Brunetto, Silvia Renata Gaido Cortopassi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-12-01
Series:Veterinary and Animal Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451943X20300442
id doaj-b670088a0af9497d9d6098f327fd892f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b670088a0af9497d9d6098f327fd892f2020-12-15T04:10:42ZengElsevierVeterinary and Animal Science2451-943X2020-12-0110100131Comparative study of anaesthesia induction in obese dogs using propofol dosages based on lean body weight or total body weightFernanda Corrêa Devito0Geni Cristina Fonseca Patricio1Patrícia Bonifácio Flôr2Thiago Henrique Annibale Vendramini3Andressa Rodrigues Amaral4Karina Pfrimer5Marcio Antonio Brunetto6Silvia Renata Gaido Cortopassi7Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-270, BrazilFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-270, BrazilFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-270, BrazilFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-270, BrazilFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-270, BrazilFaculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049-900, BrazilFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-270, Brazil; Corresponding author.Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia (FMVZ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-270, BrazilThe objective of this study was to compare the dosages for anesthesia induction in obese dogs using propofol based on lean body weight or total body weight. For this purpose, seven dogs with ideal body condition score (BCS) (BCS 4-5; 17.3 ± 2.5% fat mass) were included in the control group (CG), seven obese dogs (BCS 8-9; 45.7 ± 2.9% fat mass) in the total body weight group (TBWG) and seven obese dogs (BCS 8-9; 42.8 ± 6.3% fat mass) in the lean body weight group (LBWG). Anaesthesia was induced by a constant rate infusion of propofol at 150 mg kg−1 hour−1 through a propofol infusion pump until the loss of consciousness; the animals in CG and TBWG received a propofol infusion based on total body weight; the animals in LBWG received a propofol infusion based on lean body mass (in kg) determined by the deuterium dilution method. The results were compared between the groups using the Tukey test (p < 0.05). The propofol dosage used was 11.4 ± 3.2 mg kg−1, 8.0± 2.0 mg kg−1 and 14.1 ± 4.7 mg kg−1 in groups CG, TBWG and LBWG, respectively, and they were different among all groups (p < 0.001). There was also a statistical difference in the time between the start of propofol infusion and loss of consciousness in which LBWG took longer than CG and TBWG (p = 0.004). This study shows that obese dogs require lower dosages of propofol when inducing anesthesia than ideal BCS dogs anesthetized with dosages based on total body weight, when the propofol dosages are calculated on the basis of muscle mass it should be increased.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451943X20300442CaninesObesityOverweightLean massFat mass
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fernanda Corrêa Devito
Geni Cristina Fonseca Patricio
Patrícia Bonifácio Flôr
Thiago Henrique Annibale Vendramini
Andressa Rodrigues Amaral
Karina Pfrimer
Marcio Antonio Brunetto
Silvia Renata Gaido Cortopassi
spellingShingle Fernanda Corrêa Devito
Geni Cristina Fonseca Patricio
Patrícia Bonifácio Flôr
Thiago Henrique Annibale Vendramini
Andressa Rodrigues Amaral
Karina Pfrimer
Marcio Antonio Brunetto
Silvia Renata Gaido Cortopassi
Comparative study of anaesthesia induction in obese dogs using propofol dosages based on lean body weight or total body weight
Veterinary and Animal Science
Canines
Obesity
Overweight
Lean mass
Fat mass
author_facet Fernanda Corrêa Devito
Geni Cristina Fonseca Patricio
Patrícia Bonifácio Flôr
Thiago Henrique Annibale Vendramini
Andressa Rodrigues Amaral
Karina Pfrimer
Marcio Antonio Brunetto
Silvia Renata Gaido Cortopassi
author_sort Fernanda Corrêa Devito
title Comparative study of anaesthesia induction in obese dogs using propofol dosages based on lean body weight or total body weight
title_short Comparative study of anaesthesia induction in obese dogs using propofol dosages based on lean body weight or total body weight
title_full Comparative study of anaesthesia induction in obese dogs using propofol dosages based on lean body weight or total body weight
title_fullStr Comparative study of anaesthesia induction in obese dogs using propofol dosages based on lean body weight or total body weight
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of anaesthesia induction in obese dogs using propofol dosages based on lean body weight or total body weight
title_sort comparative study of anaesthesia induction in obese dogs using propofol dosages based on lean body weight or total body weight
publisher Elsevier
series Veterinary and Animal Science
issn 2451-943X
publishDate 2020-12-01
description The objective of this study was to compare the dosages for anesthesia induction in obese dogs using propofol based on lean body weight or total body weight. For this purpose, seven dogs with ideal body condition score (BCS) (BCS 4-5; 17.3 ± 2.5% fat mass) were included in the control group (CG), seven obese dogs (BCS 8-9; 45.7 ± 2.9% fat mass) in the total body weight group (TBWG) and seven obese dogs (BCS 8-9; 42.8 ± 6.3% fat mass) in the lean body weight group (LBWG). Anaesthesia was induced by a constant rate infusion of propofol at 150 mg kg−1 hour−1 through a propofol infusion pump until the loss of consciousness; the animals in CG and TBWG received a propofol infusion based on total body weight; the animals in LBWG received a propofol infusion based on lean body mass (in kg) determined by the deuterium dilution method. The results were compared between the groups using the Tukey test (p < 0.05). The propofol dosage used was 11.4 ± 3.2 mg kg−1, 8.0± 2.0 mg kg−1 and 14.1 ± 4.7 mg kg−1 in groups CG, TBWG and LBWG, respectively, and they were different among all groups (p < 0.001). There was also a statistical difference in the time between the start of propofol infusion and loss of consciousness in which LBWG took longer than CG and TBWG (p = 0.004). This study shows that obese dogs require lower dosages of propofol when inducing anesthesia than ideal BCS dogs anesthetized with dosages based on total body weight, when the propofol dosages are calculated on the basis of muscle mass it should be increased.
topic Canines
Obesity
Overweight
Lean mass
Fat mass
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451943X20300442
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandacorreadevito comparativestudyofanaesthesiainductioninobesedogsusingpropofoldosagesbasedonleanbodyweightortotalbodyweight
AT genicristinafonsecapatricio comparativestudyofanaesthesiainductioninobesedogsusingpropofoldosagesbasedonleanbodyweightortotalbodyweight
AT patriciabonifacioflor comparativestudyofanaesthesiainductioninobesedogsusingpropofoldosagesbasedonleanbodyweightortotalbodyweight
AT thiagohenriqueannibalevendramini comparativestudyofanaesthesiainductioninobesedogsusingpropofoldosagesbasedonleanbodyweightortotalbodyweight
AT andressarodriguesamaral comparativestudyofanaesthesiainductioninobesedogsusingpropofoldosagesbasedonleanbodyweightortotalbodyweight
AT karinapfrimer comparativestudyofanaesthesiainductioninobesedogsusingpropofoldosagesbasedonleanbodyweightortotalbodyweight
AT marcioantoniobrunetto comparativestudyofanaesthesiainductioninobesedogsusingpropofoldosagesbasedonleanbodyweightortotalbodyweight
AT silviarenatagaidocortopassi comparativestudyofanaesthesiainductioninobesedogsusingpropofoldosagesbasedonleanbodyweightortotalbodyweight
_version_ 1724382832815505408