An analysis of male cultural hegemony in senior management in UK academia

This article examines how academia in the UK is created and perpetuated by men for men. It is based on three of the author’s research projects whose findings indicate patterns of discrimination in UK Higher Education (HE) institutes. The research projects collected both qualitative and quantitative...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Barbara Bagilhole
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Complutense de Madrid 2016-12-01
Series:Investigaciones Feministas
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/INFE/article/view/53778
id doaj-b66c5d650eb445449332adb75f38dfea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b66c5d650eb445449332adb75f38dfea2020-11-25T01:29:06ZengUniversidad Complutense de MadridInvestigaciones Feministas2171-60802016-12-017292310.5209/INFE.5377851156An analysis of male cultural hegemony in senior management in UK academiaBarbara BagilholeThis article examines how academia in the UK is created and perpetuated by men for men. It is based on three of the author’s research projects whose findings indicate patterns of discrimination in UK Higher Education (HE) institutes. The research projects collected both qualitative and quantitative data. The qualitative research involved in-depth semi-structured interviews with 80 academics, both women and men at all levels in the UK academic hierarchy. The quantitative research was undertaken via a website survey of the profiles of senior managers in UK HE institutes. The hypothesis is explored that an important mechanism for the continued narrow male-dominated senior management of HE is the disjuncture between formal and informal processes around university promotion. On the one hand, while transparent formal processes seek to locate promotions policies within Equal Opportunity (EO) legislation, other important informal processes are opaque, if not invisible, e.g. definitions of merit, and ways of fostering career development. Rather, these latter rely on particular forms of self-promotion, promotion by certain influential others, and subjective interpretation of policies in a way that tends to marginalise women. It is argued that male cultural hegemony, in replicating itself, perpetuates structures and practices that are insular and designed to primarily benefit a narrow group of men in senior management. These tend to be predominantly, from the disciplines in the physical sciences or engineering where men predominate. It argues that women need to challenge these structures and processes to make universities more compatible with the aspirations of women in academia and to make them more successful institutionally.http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/INFE/article/view/53778alta direcciónhegemonía cultural masculinauniversidadmujeresReino Unido.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Barbara Bagilhole
spellingShingle Barbara Bagilhole
An analysis of male cultural hegemony in senior management in UK academia
Investigaciones Feministas
alta dirección
hegemonía cultural masculina
universidad
mujeres
Reino Unido.
author_facet Barbara Bagilhole
author_sort Barbara Bagilhole
title An analysis of male cultural hegemony in senior management in UK academia
title_short An analysis of male cultural hegemony in senior management in UK academia
title_full An analysis of male cultural hegemony in senior management in UK academia
title_fullStr An analysis of male cultural hegemony in senior management in UK academia
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of male cultural hegemony in senior management in UK academia
title_sort analysis of male cultural hegemony in senior management in uk academia
publisher Universidad Complutense de Madrid
series Investigaciones Feministas
issn 2171-6080
publishDate 2016-12-01
description This article examines how academia in the UK is created and perpetuated by men for men. It is based on three of the author’s research projects whose findings indicate patterns of discrimination in UK Higher Education (HE) institutes. The research projects collected both qualitative and quantitative data. The qualitative research involved in-depth semi-structured interviews with 80 academics, both women and men at all levels in the UK academic hierarchy. The quantitative research was undertaken via a website survey of the profiles of senior managers in UK HE institutes. The hypothesis is explored that an important mechanism for the continued narrow male-dominated senior management of HE is the disjuncture between formal and informal processes around university promotion. On the one hand, while transparent formal processes seek to locate promotions policies within Equal Opportunity (EO) legislation, other important informal processes are opaque, if not invisible, e.g. definitions of merit, and ways of fostering career development. Rather, these latter rely on particular forms of self-promotion, promotion by certain influential others, and subjective interpretation of policies in a way that tends to marginalise women. It is argued that male cultural hegemony, in replicating itself, perpetuates structures and practices that are insular and designed to primarily benefit a narrow group of men in senior management. These tend to be predominantly, from the disciplines in the physical sciences or engineering where men predominate. It argues that women need to challenge these structures and processes to make universities more compatible with the aspirations of women in academia and to make them more successful institutionally.
topic alta dirección
hegemonía cultural masculina
universidad
mujeres
Reino Unido.
url http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/INFE/article/view/53778
work_keys_str_mv AT barbarabagilhole ananalysisofmaleculturalhegemonyinseniormanagementinukacademia
AT barbarabagilhole analysisofmaleculturalhegemonyinseniormanagementinukacademia
_version_ 1725098617236094976