Kombinasi untuk Penguatan Demokrasi: Kapasitas Lembaga Representasi Politik di Surakarta oleh PDI-P dan KOMPIP

<p>The dynamicity of democratization in Indonesia has been running for a long time since President Soeharto era’s felt and tend to be stagnant if they not deemed declined. Some of democratic institutions that have fundamental role in representing society in public policy legislations are exact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aris Setiawan Yodi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang 2017-07-01
Series:Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpi/article/view/9397
id doaj-b6662501b4414088a390de25bdac1a20
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b6662501b4414088a390de25bdac1a202021-01-02T04:45:30ZengPolitical Science Program, Universitas Negeri SemarangPolitik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review2477-80602503-44562017-07-012212114010.15294/jpi.v2i2.93976129Kombinasi untuk Penguatan Demokrasi: Kapasitas Lembaga Representasi Politik di Surakarta oleh PDI-P dan KOMPIPAris Setiawan Yodi0Universitas Gadjah Mada<p>The dynamicity of democratization in Indonesia has been running for a long time since President Soeharto era’s felt and tend to be stagnant if they not deemed declined. Some of democratic institutions that have fundamental role in representing society in public policy legislations are exactly in lower point. This research was conducted to map the representation of capacity for formal and informal institution of democracy. How the capacity for representation formal and informal representation institutions in Surakarta? Through the PDI-P and KOMPIP Solo, two important institution which role the democratization process in Surakarta. Hopefully, it can be used as a reference to start cooperation between democratic institutions. This research is intended to expose the collaboration between formal and informal institutions that has different strengths and weaknesses among others. PDI-P has settle form of political capacity and big masses. Meanwhile, the capacity of KOMPIP is very technocratic, which is seen from some training efforts and empowerment of citizens with hard skill and soft skill things. It indicates, if the two institutions with different characters are able to cooperate well, it will guarantee the democratic life in Indonesia.</p>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpi/article/view/9397DemocracyRepresentationSurakartaPDI-P SurakartaKOMPIP Solo
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aris Setiawan Yodi
spellingShingle Aris Setiawan Yodi
Kombinasi untuk Penguatan Demokrasi: Kapasitas Lembaga Representasi Politik di Surakarta oleh PDI-P dan KOMPIP
Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review
Democracy
Representation
Surakarta
PDI-P Surakarta
KOMPIP Solo
author_facet Aris Setiawan Yodi
author_sort Aris Setiawan Yodi
title Kombinasi untuk Penguatan Demokrasi: Kapasitas Lembaga Representasi Politik di Surakarta oleh PDI-P dan KOMPIP
title_short Kombinasi untuk Penguatan Demokrasi: Kapasitas Lembaga Representasi Politik di Surakarta oleh PDI-P dan KOMPIP
title_full Kombinasi untuk Penguatan Demokrasi: Kapasitas Lembaga Representasi Politik di Surakarta oleh PDI-P dan KOMPIP
title_fullStr Kombinasi untuk Penguatan Demokrasi: Kapasitas Lembaga Representasi Politik di Surakarta oleh PDI-P dan KOMPIP
title_full_unstemmed Kombinasi untuk Penguatan Demokrasi: Kapasitas Lembaga Representasi Politik di Surakarta oleh PDI-P dan KOMPIP
title_sort kombinasi untuk penguatan demokrasi: kapasitas lembaga representasi politik di surakarta oleh pdi-p dan kompip
publisher Political Science Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang
series Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review
issn 2477-8060
2503-4456
publishDate 2017-07-01
description <p>The dynamicity of democratization in Indonesia has been running for a long time since President Soeharto era’s felt and tend to be stagnant if they not deemed declined. Some of democratic institutions that have fundamental role in representing society in public policy legislations are exactly in lower point. This research was conducted to map the representation of capacity for formal and informal institution of democracy. How the capacity for representation formal and informal representation institutions in Surakarta? Through the PDI-P and KOMPIP Solo, two important institution which role the democratization process in Surakarta. Hopefully, it can be used as a reference to start cooperation between democratic institutions. This research is intended to expose the collaboration between formal and informal institutions that has different strengths and weaknesses among others. PDI-P has settle form of political capacity and big masses. Meanwhile, the capacity of KOMPIP is very technocratic, which is seen from some training efforts and empowerment of citizens with hard skill and soft skill things. It indicates, if the two institutions with different characters are able to cooperate well, it will guarantee the democratic life in Indonesia.</p>
topic Democracy
Representation
Surakarta
PDI-P Surakarta
KOMPIP Solo
url https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpi/article/view/9397
work_keys_str_mv AT arissetiawanyodi kombinasiuntukpenguatandemokrasikapasitaslembagarepresentasipolitikdisurakartaolehpdipdankompip
_version_ 1724360315637858304