Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Introduction: Present study examined the frequency of CMV infection during follow-up using quantitative nucleic acid amplification testing, the frequency of administration of infection prophylaxis, viremia and infection in kidney transplant recipients who underwent transplantation (TX) at the Univer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dino Šisl, Lada Zibar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Medicine Osijek 2021-04-01
Series:Southeastern European Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://seemedj.mefos.unios.hr/index.php/seemedj/article/view/203/95
id doaj-b6615630bb264c189c9bb475c633f34a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b6615630bb264c189c9bb475c633f34a2021-04-30T08:54:26ZengFaculty of Medicine OsijekSoutheastern European Medical Journal2459-94842021-04-0151172410.26332/seemedj.v5i1.203Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant RecipientsDino Šisl0Lada Zibar1University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Department of Physiology and Immunology, Croatian Institute for Brain Research, Laboratory for Molecular Immunology, Zagreb, CroatiaDepartment of Nephrology, Internal Medicine Clinic, Merkur Clinical Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; Department of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University Osijek, CroatiaIntroduction: Present study examined the frequency of CMV infection during follow-up using quantitative nucleic acid amplification testing, the frequency of administration of infection prophylaxis, viremia and infection in kidney transplant recipients who underwent transplantation (TX) at the University Hospital Center Osijek. Materials and Methods: 107 kidney recipients who underwent transplantation in the period 20 October 2007 – 24 August 2016 were included. Demographic and clinical data, data about pre-transplantation CMV IgG test results of recipients and their donors, data about CMV prophylaxis, viremia, infection, and kidney transplant function were taken from medical records and analyzed. Results: 92.5% of kidney recipients and 86% of donors were CMV IgG positive before TX. 28% of recipients were CMV-DNA positive at some point after TX, none of whom received a transplant from an IgG negative donor. 89.7% of participants received CMV prophylaxis. Seven participants developed CMV disease, 2 of whom were not administered prophylaxis. Participants were tested for CMV-DNA once a year (median; min 0 max 6). CMV disease was marginally more frequent in those who did not receive valganciclovir prophylaxis (P = 0.066). Conclusion: It seems wise to enforce the administration of CMV prophylaxis and CMV-DNA testing in accordance with protocol, in order to detect viremia on time and to implement preemptive treatment, aiming at prevention of clinical manifestation of infection and preservation of graft function.http://seemedj.mefos.unios.hr/index.php/seemedj/article/view/203/95cytomegaloviruskidney transplantationcmv-dnaprophylaxisvalganciclovir
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dino Šisl
Lada Zibar
spellingShingle Dino Šisl
Lada Zibar
Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Southeastern European Medical Journal
cytomegalovirus
kidney transplantation
cmv-dna
prophylaxis
valganciclovir
author_facet Dino Šisl
Lada Zibar
author_sort Dino Šisl
title Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients
title_short Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients
title_full Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients
title_fullStr Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients
title_full_unstemmed Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients
title_sort cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients
publisher Faculty of Medicine Osijek
series Southeastern European Medical Journal
issn 2459-9484
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Introduction: Present study examined the frequency of CMV infection during follow-up using quantitative nucleic acid amplification testing, the frequency of administration of infection prophylaxis, viremia and infection in kidney transplant recipients who underwent transplantation (TX) at the University Hospital Center Osijek. Materials and Methods: 107 kidney recipients who underwent transplantation in the period 20 October 2007 – 24 August 2016 were included. Demographic and clinical data, data about pre-transplantation CMV IgG test results of recipients and their donors, data about CMV prophylaxis, viremia, infection, and kidney transplant function were taken from medical records and analyzed. Results: 92.5% of kidney recipients and 86% of donors were CMV IgG positive before TX. 28% of recipients were CMV-DNA positive at some point after TX, none of whom received a transplant from an IgG negative donor. 89.7% of participants received CMV prophylaxis. Seven participants developed CMV disease, 2 of whom were not administered prophylaxis. Participants were tested for CMV-DNA once a year (median; min 0 max 6). CMV disease was marginally more frequent in those who did not receive valganciclovir prophylaxis (P = 0.066). Conclusion: It seems wise to enforce the administration of CMV prophylaxis and CMV-DNA testing in accordance with protocol, in order to detect viremia on time and to implement preemptive treatment, aiming at prevention of clinical manifestation of infection and preservation of graft function.
topic cytomegalovirus
kidney transplantation
cmv-dna
prophylaxis
valganciclovir
url http://seemedj.mefos.unios.hr/index.php/seemedj/article/view/203/95
work_keys_str_mv AT dinosisl cytomegalovirusinfectioninkidneytransplantrecipients
AT ladazibar cytomegalovirusinfectioninkidneytransplantrecipients
_version_ 1721498152453799936