The Foundation Role for Theories of Agency in Understanding Information Systems Design

In this paper we argue that theories of agency form a foundation upon which we can build a deeper understanding of information systems design. We do so by firstly recognising that information systems are part of purposeful sociotechnical systems and that consequently theories of agency may help in u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert Johnston, Simon Milton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Australasian Association for Information Systems 2002-11-01
Series:Australasian Journal of Information Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/442
id doaj-b6462fdd6b2546b4b98f57e753910651
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b6462fdd6b2546b4b98f57e7539106512021-08-02T03:31:41ZengAustralasian Association for Information SystemsAustralasian Journal of Information Systems1449-86181449-86182002-11-0110110.3127/ajis.v10i1.442390The Foundation Role for Theories of Agency in Understanding Information Systems DesignRobert JohnstonSimon MiltonIn this paper we argue that theories of agency form a foundation upon which we can build a deeper understanding of information systems design. We do so by firstly recognising that information systems are part of purposeful sociotechnical systems and that consequently theories of agency may help in understanding them. We then present two alternative theories of agency (deliberative and situational), mainly drawn from the robotics and artificial intelligence disciplines, and in doing so, we note that existing information system design methods and ontological studies of those methods implicitly adhere to the deliberative theory of agency. We also note that while there are advantages in specific circumstances from utilising the situated theory of agency in designing complex systems, because of their differing ontological commitments, such systems would be difficult to analyse and evaluate using ontologies currently used in information systems. We then provide evidence that such situational information systems can indeed exist, by giving a specific example (the Kanban system), which has emerged from manufacturing practice. We conclude that information systems are likely to benefit from creating design approaches supporting the production of situational systems.http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/442foundations of information systemsFOISagencysociotechnicaldeliberativesituationalontology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert Johnston
Simon Milton
spellingShingle Robert Johnston
Simon Milton
The Foundation Role for Theories of Agency in Understanding Information Systems Design
Australasian Journal of Information Systems
foundations of information systems
FOIS
agency
sociotechnical
deliberative
situational
ontology
author_facet Robert Johnston
Simon Milton
author_sort Robert Johnston
title The Foundation Role for Theories of Agency in Understanding Information Systems Design
title_short The Foundation Role for Theories of Agency in Understanding Information Systems Design
title_full The Foundation Role for Theories of Agency in Understanding Information Systems Design
title_fullStr The Foundation Role for Theories of Agency in Understanding Information Systems Design
title_full_unstemmed The Foundation Role for Theories of Agency in Understanding Information Systems Design
title_sort foundation role for theories of agency in understanding information systems design
publisher Australasian Association for Information Systems
series Australasian Journal of Information Systems
issn 1449-8618
1449-8618
publishDate 2002-11-01
description In this paper we argue that theories of agency form a foundation upon which we can build a deeper understanding of information systems design. We do so by firstly recognising that information systems are part of purposeful sociotechnical systems and that consequently theories of agency may help in understanding them. We then present two alternative theories of agency (deliberative and situational), mainly drawn from the robotics and artificial intelligence disciplines, and in doing so, we note that existing information system design methods and ontological studies of those methods implicitly adhere to the deliberative theory of agency. We also note that while there are advantages in specific circumstances from utilising the situated theory of agency in designing complex systems, because of their differing ontological commitments, such systems would be difficult to analyse and evaluate using ontologies currently used in information systems. We then provide evidence that such situational information systems can indeed exist, by giving a specific example (the Kanban system), which has emerged from manufacturing practice. We conclude that information systems are likely to benefit from creating design approaches supporting the production of situational systems.
topic foundations of information systems
FOIS
agency
sociotechnical
deliberative
situational
ontology
url http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/442
work_keys_str_mv AT robertjohnston thefoundationrolefortheoriesofagencyinunderstandinginformationsystemsdesign
AT simonmilton thefoundationrolefortheoriesofagencyinunderstandinginformationsystemsdesign
AT robertjohnston foundationrolefortheoriesofagencyinunderstandinginformationsystemsdesign
AT simonmilton foundationrolefortheoriesofagencyinunderstandinginformationsystemsdesign
_version_ 1724163061462335488