Technical note: Measuring tropospheric OH and HO2 by laser-induced fluorescence at low pressure. A comparison of calibration techniques

The hydroxyl radical (OH) is one of the most important oxidants in the atmosphere, as it is involved in many reactions that affect regional air quality and global climate change. Because of its high reactivity, measurements of OH radical concentrations in the atmosphere are difficult, and often requ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. S. Stevens, D. Vimal, S. Dusanter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2008-01-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/321/2008/acp-8-321-2008.pdf
id doaj-b637dbd39a1942569f31d22836e2dcac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b637dbd39a1942569f31d22836e2dcac2020-11-24T23:13:48ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242008-01-0182321340Technical note: Measuring tropospheric OH and HO2 by laser-induced fluorescence at low pressure. A comparison of calibration techniquesP. S. StevensD. VimalS. DusanterThe hydroxyl radical (OH) is one of the most important oxidants in the atmosphere, as it is involved in many reactions that affect regional air quality and global climate change. Because of its high reactivity, measurements of OH radical concentrations in the atmosphere are difficult, and often require careful calibrations that rely on the production of a known concentration of OH at atmospheric pressure. The Indiana University OH instrument, based on the Fluorescence Assay by Gas Expansion technique (FAGE), has been calibrated in the laboratory using two different approaches: the production of OH from the UV-photolysis of water-vapor, and the steady-state production of OH from the reaction of ozone with alkenes. The former technique relies on two different actinometric methods to measure the product of the lamp flux at 184.9 nm and the photolysis time. This quantity derived from N<sub>2</sub>O actinometry was found to be 1.5 times higher than that derived from O<sub>2</sub> actinometry. The water photolysis and ozone-alkene techniques are shown to agree within their experimental uncertainties (respectively 17% and 44%), although the sensitivities derived from the ozone-alkene technique were systematically lower by 40% than those derived from the water-vapor UV- photolysis technique using O<sub>2</sub> actinometry. The agreement between the two different methods improves the confidence of the water-vapor photolysis method as an accurate calibration technique for HO<sub>x</sub> instruments. Because several aspects of the mechanism of the gas phase ozonolysis of alkenes are still uncertain, this technique should be used with caution to calibrate OH instruments. http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/321/2008/acp-8-321-2008.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P. S. Stevens
D. Vimal
S. Dusanter
spellingShingle P. S. Stevens
D. Vimal
S. Dusanter
Technical note: Measuring tropospheric OH and HO2 by laser-induced fluorescence at low pressure. A comparison of calibration techniques
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet P. S. Stevens
D. Vimal
S. Dusanter
author_sort P. S. Stevens
title Technical note: Measuring tropospheric OH and HO2 by laser-induced fluorescence at low pressure. A comparison of calibration techniques
title_short Technical note: Measuring tropospheric OH and HO2 by laser-induced fluorescence at low pressure. A comparison of calibration techniques
title_full Technical note: Measuring tropospheric OH and HO2 by laser-induced fluorescence at low pressure. A comparison of calibration techniques
title_fullStr Technical note: Measuring tropospheric OH and HO2 by laser-induced fluorescence at low pressure. A comparison of calibration techniques
title_full_unstemmed Technical note: Measuring tropospheric OH and HO2 by laser-induced fluorescence at low pressure. A comparison of calibration techniques
title_sort technical note: measuring tropospheric oh and ho2 by laser-induced fluorescence at low pressure. a comparison of calibration techniques
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2008-01-01
description The hydroxyl radical (OH) is one of the most important oxidants in the atmosphere, as it is involved in many reactions that affect regional air quality and global climate change. Because of its high reactivity, measurements of OH radical concentrations in the atmosphere are difficult, and often require careful calibrations that rely on the production of a known concentration of OH at atmospheric pressure. The Indiana University OH instrument, based on the Fluorescence Assay by Gas Expansion technique (FAGE), has been calibrated in the laboratory using two different approaches: the production of OH from the UV-photolysis of water-vapor, and the steady-state production of OH from the reaction of ozone with alkenes. The former technique relies on two different actinometric methods to measure the product of the lamp flux at 184.9 nm and the photolysis time. This quantity derived from N<sub>2</sub>O actinometry was found to be 1.5 times higher than that derived from O<sub>2</sub> actinometry. The water photolysis and ozone-alkene techniques are shown to agree within their experimental uncertainties (respectively 17% and 44%), although the sensitivities derived from the ozone-alkene technique were systematically lower by 40% than those derived from the water-vapor UV- photolysis technique using O<sub>2</sub> actinometry. The agreement between the two different methods improves the confidence of the water-vapor photolysis method as an accurate calibration technique for HO<sub>x</sub> instruments. Because several aspects of the mechanism of the gas phase ozonolysis of alkenes are still uncertain, this technique should be used with caution to calibrate OH instruments.
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/321/2008/acp-8-321-2008.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT psstevens technicalnotemeasuringtroposphericohandho2bylaserinducedfluorescenceatlowpressureacomparisonofcalibrationtechniques
AT dvimal technicalnotemeasuringtroposphericohandho2bylaserinducedfluorescenceatlowpressureacomparisonofcalibrationtechniques
AT sdusanter technicalnotemeasuringtroposphericohandho2bylaserinducedfluorescenceatlowpressureacomparisonofcalibrationtechniques
_version_ 1725596563140509696