A Post-Training Study on the Budgeting Criteria Set and Priority for MALE UAS Design

A recent study proposed a systematic “(budgeting) knowledge discovery educational framework„ (BKDEF). This BKDEF is focused on guiding staff training courses for enhancing the ability to allocate the “large but limited„ budget for single, high-cost product des...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li-Pin Chi, Chen-Hua Fu, Jeng-Pyng Chyng, Zheng-Yun Zhuang, Jen-Hung Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1798
id doaj-b63696797c194d93bff46979c598673e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b63696797c194d93bff46979c598673e2020-11-24T20:41:56ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-03-01116179810.3390/su11061798su11061798A Post-Training Study on the Budgeting Criteria Set and Priority for MALE UAS DesignLi-Pin Chi0Chen-Hua Fu1Jeng-Pyng Chyng2Zheng-Yun Zhuang3Jen-Hung Huang4Department of Management Science, College of Management, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, TaiwanDepartment of Information Management, College of Management, National Defense University, Taipei 11258, TaiwanHS-Link Digitals Corporation, New Taipei City 23586, TaiwanDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, TaiwanDepartment of Management Science, College of Management, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, TaiwanA recent study proposed a systematic “(budgeting) knowledge discovery educational framework„ (BKDEF). This BKDEF is focused on guiding staff training courses for enhancing the ability to allocate the “large but limited„ budget for single, high-cost product design. However, except for its initial application to support the budget planning for the next generation fighter design, the framework’s effectiveness is still awaiting further scrutiny. This study fills the gap by providing the “second application„ of BKDEF, which is to support another similar decision for designing the medium-altitude long-endurance unmanned aerial system (MALE UAS). This paper verified the effectiveness of the framework through an empirical application and obtained the knowledge required to allocate a budget for MALE UAS design following the group-opinion basis. In addition, the original analytical style for the last “decision analysis„ phase of BKDEF, which included pure quantitative analytical items in order to understand the similarities and diversities in the individual opinions, was replaced by a comparative study to discover the homogeneity and heterogeneity between the two budgeting decisions in a larger scope. As a consequence, the two criteria sets did not overlap despite both decisions being related to military aircraft design. The absolute weights for the MALE UAS design criteria were more balanced than those for the air-superior fighter design, even if the size of the criteria set was larger. The results pave a way for future studies on how other military aircrafts are designed, as more confidence about the use of a BKDEF can be gained from increasing applications, thus more insightful aerospace knowledge can be exploited in comparisons with these works.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1798budgetingknowledgediscoveryeducationalframeworkBKDEFMALE UASdesigndecision-makingcomparative studyair-superior fighter
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Li-Pin Chi
Chen-Hua Fu
Jeng-Pyng Chyng
Zheng-Yun Zhuang
Jen-Hung Huang
spellingShingle Li-Pin Chi
Chen-Hua Fu
Jeng-Pyng Chyng
Zheng-Yun Zhuang
Jen-Hung Huang
A Post-Training Study on the Budgeting Criteria Set and Priority for MALE UAS Design
Sustainability
budgeting
knowledge
discovery
educational
framework
BKDEF
MALE UAS
design
decision-making
comparative study
air-superior fighter
author_facet Li-Pin Chi
Chen-Hua Fu
Jeng-Pyng Chyng
Zheng-Yun Zhuang
Jen-Hung Huang
author_sort Li-Pin Chi
title A Post-Training Study on the Budgeting Criteria Set and Priority for MALE UAS Design
title_short A Post-Training Study on the Budgeting Criteria Set and Priority for MALE UAS Design
title_full A Post-Training Study on the Budgeting Criteria Set and Priority for MALE UAS Design
title_fullStr A Post-Training Study on the Budgeting Criteria Set and Priority for MALE UAS Design
title_full_unstemmed A Post-Training Study on the Budgeting Criteria Set and Priority for MALE UAS Design
title_sort post-training study on the budgeting criteria set and priority for male uas design
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-03-01
description A recent study proposed a systematic “(budgeting) knowledge discovery educational framework„ (BKDEF). This BKDEF is focused on guiding staff training courses for enhancing the ability to allocate the “large but limited„ budget for single, high-cost product design. However, except for its initial application to support the budget planning for the next generation fighter design, the framework’s effectiveness is still awaiting further scrutiny. This study fills the gap by providing the “second application„ of BKDEF, which is to support another similar decision for designing the medium-altitude long-endurance unmanned aerial system (MALE UAS). This paper verified the effectiveness of the framework through an empirical application and obtained the knowledge required to allocate a budget for MALE UAS design following the group-opinion basis. In addition, the original analytical style for the last “decision analysis„ phase of BKDEF, which included pure quantitative analytical items in order to understand the similarities and diversities in the individual opinions, was replaced by a comparative study to discover the homogeneity and heterogeneity between the two budgeting decisions in a larger scope. As a consequence, the two criteria sets did not overlap despite both decisions being related to military aircraft design. The absolute weights for the MALE UAS design criteria were more balanced than those for the air-superior fighter design, even if the size of the criteria set was larger. The results pave a way for future studies on how other military aircrafts are designed, as more confidence about the use of a BKDEF can be gained from increasing applications, thus more insightful aerospace knowledge can be exploited in comparisons with these works.
topic budgeting
knowledge
discovery
educational
framework
BKDEF
MALE UAS
design
decision-making
comparative study
air-superior fighter
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1798
work_keys_str_mv AT lipinchi aposttrainingstudyonthebudgetingcriteriasetandpriorityformaleuasdesign
AT chenhuafu aposttrainingstudyonthebudgetingcriteriasetandpriorityformaleuasdesign
AT jengpyngchyng aposttrainingstudyonthebudgetingcriteriasetandpriorityformaleuasdesign
AT zhengyunzhuang aposttrainingstudyonthebudgetingcriteriasetandpriorityformaleuasdesign
AT jenhunghuang aposttrainingstudyonthebudgetingcriteriasetandpriorityformaleuasdesign
AT lipinchi posttrainingstudyonthebudgetingcriteriasetandpriorityformaleuasdesign
AT chenhuafu posttrainingstudyonthebudgetingcriteriasetandpriorityformaleuasdesign
AT jengpyngchyng posttrainingstudyonthebudgetingcriteriasetandpriorityformaleuasdesign
AT zhengyunzhuang posttrainingstudyonthebudgetingcriteriasetandpriorityformaleuasdesign
AT jenhunghuang posttrainingstudyonthebudgetingcriteriasetandpriorityformaleuasdesign
_version_ 1716823813389287424