Navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves the outcome of postsurgical paresis in glioma patients – A randomized, double-blinded trial

Background: Navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (nrTMS) is effective therapy for stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation could be supported by low-frequency stimulation of the non-damaged hemisphere to reduce transcallosal inhibition. Objective: The present study examines the effect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Ille, Anna Kelm, Axel Schroeder, Lucia E. Albers, Chiara Negwer, Vicki M. Butenschoen, Nico Sollmann, Thomas Picht, Peter Vajkoczy, Bernhard Meyer, Sandro M. Krieg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-07-01
Series:Brain Stimulation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X21000966
id doaj-b5f8b121a8b3440daa7eb94bd3d06342
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Ille
Anna Kelm
Axel Schroeder
Lucia E. Albers
Chiara Negwer
Vicki M. Butenschoen
Nico Sollmann
Thomas Picht
Peter Vajkoczy
Bernhard Meyer
Sandro M. Krieg
spellingShingle Sebastian Ille
Anna Kelm
Axel Schroeder
Lucia E. Albers
Chiara Negwer
Vicki M. Butenschoen
Nico Sollmann
Thomas Picht
Peter Vajkoczy
Bernhard Meyer
Sandro M. Krieg
Navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves the outcome of postsurgical paresis in glioma patients – A randomized, double-blinded trial
Brain Stimulation
Glioma
Paresis
Postsurgical
Therapy
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
author_facet Sebastian Ille
Anna Kelm
Axel Schroeder
Lucia E. Albers
Chiara Negwer
Vicki M. Butenschoen
Nico Sollmann
Thomas Picht
Peter Vajkoczy
Bernhard Meyer
Sandro M. Krieg
author_sort Sebastian Ille
title Navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves the outcome of postsurgical paresis in glioma patients – A randomized, double-blinded trial
title_short Navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves the outcome of postsurgical paresis in glioma patients – A randomized, double-blinded trial
title_full Navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves the outcome of postsurgical paresis in glioma patients – A randomized, double-blinded trial
title_fullStr Navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves the outcome of postsurgical paresis in glioma patients – A randomized, double-blinded trial
title_full_unstemmed Navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves the outcome of postsurgical paresis in glioma patients – A randomized, double-blinded trial
title_sort navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves the outcome of postsurgical paresis in glioma patients – a randomized, double-blinded trial
publisher Elsevier
series Brain Stimulation
issn 1935-861X
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Background: Navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (nrTMS) is effective therapy for stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation could be supported by low-frequency stimulation of the non-damaged hemisphere to reduce transcallosal inhibition. Objective: The present study examines the effect of postoperative nrTMS therapy of the unaffected hemisphere in glioma patients suffering from acute surgery-related paresis of the upper extremity (UE) due to subcortical ischemia. Methods: We performed a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded trial on patients suffering from acute surgery-related paresis of the UE after glioma resection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either low frequency nrTMS (1 Hz, 15 min) or sham stimulation directly before physical therapy for 7 consecutive days. We performed primary and secondary outcome measures on day 1, on day 7, and at a 3-month follow-up (FU). The primary endpoint was the change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) at FU compared to day 1 after surgery. Results: Compared to the sham stimulation, nrTMS significantly improved outcomes between day 1 and FU based on the FMA (mean [95% CI] +31.9 [22.6, 41.3] vs. +4.2 [-4.1, 12.5]; P = .001) and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (−5.6 [-7.5, −3.6] vs. −2.4 [-3.6, −1.2]; P = .02). To achieve a minimal clinically important difference of 10 points on the FMA scale, the number needed to treat is 2.19. Conclusion: The present results show that patients suffering from acute surgery-related paresis of the UE due to subcortical ischemia after glioma resection significantly benefit from low-frequency nrTMS stimulation therapy of the unaffected hemisphere. Clinical trial registration: Local institutional registration: 12/15; ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03982329
topic Glioma
Paresis
Postsurgical
Therapy
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X21000966
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianille navigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationimprovestheoutcomeofpostsurgicalparesisingliomapatientsarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
AT annakelm navigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationimprovestheoutcomeofpostsurgicalparesisingliomapatientsarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
AT axelschroeder navigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationimprovestheoutcomeofpostsurgicalparesisingliomapatientsarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
AT luciaealbers navigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationimprovestheoutcomeofpostsurgicalparesisingliomapatientsarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
AT chiaranegwer navigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationimprovestheoutcomeofpostsurgicalparesisingliomapatientsarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
AT vickimbutenschoen navigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationimprovestheoutcomeofpostsurgicalparesisingliomapatientsarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
AT nicosollmann navigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationimprovestheoutcomeofpostsurgicalparesisingliomapatientsarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
AT thomaspicht navigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationimprovestheoutcomeofpostsurgicalparesisingliomapatientsarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
AT petervajkoczy navigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationimprovestheoutcomeofpostsurgicalparesisingliomapatientsarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
AT bernhardmeyer navigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationimprovestheoutcomeofpostsurgicalparesisingliomapatientsarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
AT sandromkrieg navigatedrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationimprovestheoutcomeofpostsurgicalparesisingliomapatientsarandomizeddoubleblindedtrial
_version_ 1721290670415544320
spelling doaj-b5f8b121a8b3440daa7eb94bd3d063422021-07-23T04:48:27ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2021-07-01144780787Navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves the outcome of postsurgical paresis in glioma patients – A randomized, double-blinded trialSebastian Ille0Anna Kelm1Axel Schroeder2Lucia E. Albers3Chiara Negwer4Vicki M. Butenschoen5Nico Sollmann6Thomas Picht7Peter Vajkoczy8Bernhard Meyer9Sandro M. Krieg10Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Germany; TUM Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Germany; TUM Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Germany; TUM Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Germany; TUM Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Germany; TUM Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, GermanyTUM Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Germany; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Germany; TUM Neuroimaging Center, Technical University of Munich, Germany, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Germany; Corresponding author. Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.Background: Navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (nrTMS) is effective therapy for stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation could be supported by low-frequency stimulation of the non-damaged hemisphere to reduce transcallosal inhibition. Objective: The present study examines the effect of postoperative nrTMS therapy of the unaffected hemisphere in glioma patients suffering from acute surgery-related paresis of the upper extremity (UE) due to subcortical ischemia. Methods: We performed a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded trial on patients suffering from acute surgery-related paresis of the UE after glioma resection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either low frequency nrTMS (1 Hz, 15 min) or sham stimulation directly before physical therapy for 7 consecutive days. We performed primary and secondary outcome measures on day 1, on day 7, and at a 3-month follow-up (FU). The primary endpoint was the change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) at FU compared to day 1 after surgery. Results: Compared to the sham stimulation, nrTMS significantly improved outcomes between day 1 and FU based on the FMA (mean [95% CI] +31.9 [22.6, 41.3] vs. +4.2 [-4.1, 12.5]; P = .001) and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (−5.6 [-7.5, −3.6] vs. −2.4 [-3.6, −1.2]; P = .02). To achieve a minimal clinically important difference of 10 points on the FMA scale, the number needed to treat is 2.19. Conclusion: The present results show that patients suffering from acute surgery-related paresis of the UE due to subcortical ischemia after glioma resection significantly benefit from low-frequency nrTMS stimulation therapy of the unaffected hemisphere. Clinical trial registration: Local institutional registration: 12/15; ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03982329http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X21000966GliomaParesisPostsurgicalTherapyTranscranial magnetic stimulation