Is There a Need for a More Expansive Use of Ethics and Values in Reflecting on the Use of Animals in Scientific Research?
Although reflecting a long tradition of moral reflection that the use of animals is acceptable as long as it is humane, the tension between causing harm to animals in research and the benefits to humans can nevertheless be troubling. Utilitarian arguments that appeal to the value of those practices...
Main Author: | Mark W. Fisher |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2014-10-01
|
Series: | Animals |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/4/4/643 |
Similar Items
-
Reviewing the Review: A Pilot Study of the Ethical Review Process of Animal Research in Sweden
by: Svea Jörgensen, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Emotions and Ethical Decision-Making in Animal Ethics Committees
by: Elisabeth Tjärnström, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Necessary, but Not Sufficient. The Benefit Concept in the Project Evaluation of Animal Research in the Context of Directive 2010/63/EU
by: Matthias Eggel, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01) -
Respect in Kant’s Tugendlehre and its place in contemporary ethics
by: Darlei Dall'Agnol
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Justifiability and Animal Research in Health: Can Democratisation Help Resolve Difficulties?
by: Shaun Yon-Seng Khoo
Published: (2018-02-01)