The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
Silk-based scaffolds have been introduced to bone tissue regeneration for years, however, their local therapeutic efficiency in bone metabolic disease condition has been seldom reported. According to our previous report, mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG)/silk scaffolds exhibits superior in vitro bioa...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3827187?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-b5cd1553be374798886c27d1505b93ca |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b5cd1553be374798886c27d1505b93ca2020-11-25T00:48:43ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01811e8101410.1371/journal.pone.0081014The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.Ning ChengYuanqin WangYufeng ZhangBin ShiSilk-based scaffolds have been introduced to bone tissue regeneration for years, however, their local therapeutic efficiency in bone metabolic disease condition has been seldom reported. According to our previous report, mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG)/silk scaffolds exhibits superior in vitro bioactivity and in vivo osteogenic properties compared to non-mesoporous bioactive glass (BG)/silk scaffolds, but no information could be found about their efficiency in osteoporotic (OVX) environment. This study investigated a biomaterial-based approach for improving MSCs behavior in vitro, and accelerating OVX defect healing by using 3D BG/silk and MBG/silk scaffolds, and pure silk scaffolds as control. The results of SEM, CCK-8 assay and quantitative ALP activity showed that MBG/silk scaffolds can improve attachment, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of both O-MSCs and sham control. In vivo therapeutic efficiency was evaluated by μCT analysis, hematoxylin and eosin staining, safranin O staining and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, indicating accelerated bone formation with compatible scaffold degradation and reduced osteoclastic response of defect healing in OVX rats after 2 and 4 weeks treatment, with a rank order of MBG/silk > BG/silk > silk group. Immunohistochemical markers of COL I, OPN, BSP and OCN also revealed that MBG/silk scaffolds can better induce accelerated collagen and non-collagen matrix production. The findings of this study suggest that MBG/silk scaffolds provide a better environment for cell attachment, proliferation and differentiation, and act as potential substitute for treating local osteoporotic defects.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3827187?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ning Cheng Yuanqin Wang Yufeng Zhang Bin Shi |
spellingShingle |
Ning Cheng Yuanqin Wang Yufeng Zhang Bin Shi The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Ning Cheng Yuanqin Wang Yufeng Zhang Bin Shi |
author_sort |
Ning Cheng |
title |
The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. |
title_short |
The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. |
title_full |
The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. |
title_fullStr |
The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. |
title_sort |
osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
Silk-based scaffolds have been introduced to bone tissue regeneration for years, however, their local therapeutic efficiency in bone metabolic disease condition has been seldom reported. According to our previous report, mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG)/silk scaffolds exhibits superior in vitro bioactivity and in vivo osteogenic properties compared to non-mesoporous bioactive glass (BG)/silk scaffolds, but no information could be found about their efficiency in osteoporotic (OVX) environment. This study investigated a biomaterial-based approach for improving MSCs behavior in vitro, and accelerating OVX defect healing by using 3D BG/silk and MBG/silk scaffolds, and pure silk scaffolds as control. The results of SEM, CCK-8 assay and quantitative ALP activity showed that MBG/silk scaffolds can improve attachment, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of both O-MSCs and sham control. In vivo therapeutic efficiency was evaluated by μCT analysis, hematoxylin and eosin staining, safranin O staining and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, indicating accelerated bone formation with compatible scaffold degradation and reduced osteoclastic response of defect healing in OVX rats after 2 and 4 weeks treatment, with a rank order of MBG/silk > BG/silk > silk group. Immunohistochemical markers of COL I, OPN, BSP and OCN also revealed that MBG/silk scaffolds can better induce accelerated collagen and non-collagen matrix production. The findings of this study suggest that MBG/silk scaffolds provide a better environment for cell attachment, proliferation and differentiation, and act as potential substitute for treating local osteoporotic defects. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3827187?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ningcheng theosteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation AT yuanqinwang theosteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation AT yufengzhang theosteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation AT binshi theosteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation AT ningcheng osteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation AT yuanqinwang osteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation AT yufengzhang osteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation AT binshi osteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation |
_version_ |
1725254698830659584 |