The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.

Silk-based scaffolds have been introduced to bone tissue regeneration for years, however, their local therapeutic efficiency in bone metabolic disease condition has been seldom reported. According to our previous report, mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG)/silk scaffolds exhibits superior in vitro bioa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ning Cheng, Yuanqin Wang, Yufeng Zhang, Bin Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3827187?pdf=render
id doaj-b5cd1553be374798886c27d1505b93ca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b5cd1553be374798886c27d1505b93ca2020-11-25T00:48:43ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01811e8101410.1371/journal.pone.0081014The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.Ning ChengYuanqin WangYufeng ZhangBin ShiSilk-based scaffolds have been introduced to bone tissue regeneration for years, however, their local therapeutic efficiency in bone metabolic disease condition has been seldom reported. According to our previous report, mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG)/silk scaffolds exhibits superior in vitro bioactivity and in vivo osteogenic properties compared to non-mesoporous bioactive glass (BG)/silk scaffolds, but no information could be found about their efficiency in osteoporotic (OVX) environment. This study investigated a biomaterial-based approach for improving MSCs behavior in vitro, and accelerating OVX defect healing by using 3D BG/silk and MBG/silk scaffolds, and pure silk scaffolds as control. The results of SEM, CCK-8 assay and quantitative ALP activity showed that MBG/silk scaffolds can improve attachment, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of both O-MSCs and sham control. In vivo therapeutic efficiency was evaluated by μCT analysis, hematoxylin and eosin staining, safranin O staining and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, indicating accelerated bone formation with compatible scaffold degradation and reduced osteoclastic response of defect healing in OVX rats after 2 and 4 weeks treatment, with a rank order of MBG/silk > BG/silk > silk group. Immunohistochemical markers of COL I, OPN, BSP and OCN also revealed that MBG/silk scaffolds can better induce accelerated collagen and non-collagen matrix production. The findings of this study suggest that MBG/silk scaffolds provide a better environment for cell attachment, proliferation and differentiation, and act as potential substitute for treating local osteoporotic defects.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3827187?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ning Cheng
Yuanqin Wang
Yufeng Zhang
Bin Shi
spellingShingle Ning Cheng
Yuanqin Wang
Yufeng Zhang
Bin Shi
The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ning Cheng
Yuanqin Wang
Yufeng Zhang
Bin Shi
author_sort Ning Cheng
title The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
title_short The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
title_full The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
title_fullStr The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
title_full_unstemmed The osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
title_sort osteogenic potential of mesoporous bioglasses/silk and non-mesoporous bioglasses/silk scaffolds in ovariectomized rats: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Silk-based scaffolds have been introduced to bone tissue regeneration for years, however, their local therapeutic efficiency in bone metabolic disease condition has been seldom reported. According to our previous report, mesoporous bioactive glass (MBG)/silk scaffolds exhibits superior in vitro bioactivity and in vivo osteogenic properties compared to non-mesoporous bioactive glass (BG)/silk scaffolds, but no information could be found about their efficiency in osteoporotic (OVX) environment. This study investigated a biomaterial-based approach for improving MSCs behavior in vitro, and accelerating OVX defect healing by using 3D BG/silk and MBG/silk scaffolds, and pure silk scaffolds as control. The results of SEM, CCK-8 assay and quantitative ALP activity showed that MBG/silk scaffolds can improve attachment, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of both O-MSCs and sham control. In vivo therapeutic efficiency was evaluated by μCT analysis, hematoxylin and eosin staining, safranin O staining and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, indicating accelerated bone formation with compatible scaffold degradation and reduced osteoclastic response of defect healing in OVX rats after 2 and 4 weeks treatment, with a rank order of MBG/silk > BG/silk > silk group. Immunohistochemical markers of COL I, OPN, BSP and OCN also revealed that MBG/silk scaffolds can better induce accelerated collagen and non-collagen matrix production. The findings of this study suggest that MBG/silk scaffolds provide a better environment for cell attachment, proliferation and differentiation, and act as potential substitute for treating local osteoporotic defects.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3827187?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ningcheng theosteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation
AT yuanqinwang theosteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation
AT yufengzhang theosteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation
AT binshi theosteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation
AT ningcheng osteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation
AT yuanqinwang osteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation
AT yufengzhang osteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation
AT binshi osteogenicpotentialofmesoporousbioglassessilkandnonmesoporousbioglassessilkscaffoldsinovariectomizedratsinvitroandinvivoevaluation
_version_ 1725254698830659584