Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational model

Background: Responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are notoriously variable. Previous studies have observed a dependence of TMS-induced responses on ongoing brain activity, for instance sensorimotor rhythms. This suggests an opportunity for the development of more effective stimulation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natalie Schaworonkow, Jochen Triesch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-07-01
Series:Brain Stimulation
Subjects:
TMS
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X18300937
id doaj-b5bed279d14e4b5abe74eebe7f3a414d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b5bed279d14e4b5abe74eebe7f3a414d2021-03-19T07:11:55ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2018-07-01114828838Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational modelNatalie Schaworonkow0Jochen Triesch1Corresponding author.; Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyFrankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyBackground: Responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are notoriously variable. Previous studies have observed a dependence of TMS-induced responses on ongoing brain activity, for instance sensorimotor rhythms. This suggests an opportunity for the development of more effective stimulation protocols through closed-loop TMS-EEG. However, it is not yet clear how features of ongoing activity affect the responses of cortical circuits to TMS. Objective/Hypothesis: Here we investigate the dependence of TMS-responses on power and phase of ongoing oscillatory activity in a computational model of TMS-induced I-waves. Methods: The model comprises populations of cortical layer 2/3 (L2/3) neurons and a population of cortical layer 5 (L5) neurons and generates I-waves in response to TMS. Oscillatory input to the L2/3 neurons induces rhythmic fluctuations in activity of L5 neurons. TMS pulses are simulated at different phases and amplitudes of the ongoing rhythm. Results: The model shows a robust dependence of I-wave properties on phase and power of ongoing rhythms, with the strongest response occurring for TMS at maximal L5 depolarization. The amount of phase-modulation depends on stimulation intensity, with stronger modulation for lower intensity. Conclusion: The model predicts that responses to TMS are highly variable for low stimulation intensities if ongoing brain rhythms are not taken into account. Closed-loop TMS-EEG holds promise for obtaining more reliable TMS effects.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X18300937TMSI-wavesComputational modelingPhase-dependent stimulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Natalie Schaworonkow
Jochen Triesch
spellingShingle Natalie Schaworonkow
Jochen Triesch
Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational model
Brain Stimulation
TMS
I-waves
Computational modeling
Phase-dependent stimulation
author_facet Natalie Schaworonkow
Jochen Triesch
author_sort Natalie Schaworonkow
title Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational model
title_short Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational model
title_full Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational model
title_fullStr Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational model
title_full_unstemmed Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational model
title_sort ongoing brain rhythms shape i-wave properties in a computational model
publisher Elsevier
series Brain Stimulation
issn 1935-861X
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Background: Responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are notoriously variable. Previous studies have observed a dependence of TMS-induced responses on ongoing brain activity, for instance sensorimotor rhythms. This suggests an opportunity for the development of more effective stimulation protocols through closed-loop TMS-EEG. However, it is not yet clear how features of ongoing activity affect the responses of cortical circuits to TMS. Objective/Hypothesis: Here we investigate the dependence of TMS-responses on power and phase of ongoing oscillatory activity in a computational model of TMS-induced I-waves. Methods: The model comprises populations of cortical layer 2/3 (L2/3) neurons and a population of cortical layer 5 (L5) neurons and generates I-waves in response to TMS. Oscillatory input to the L2/3 neurons induces rhythmic fluctuations in activity of L5 neurons. TMS pulses are simulated at different phases and amplitudes of the ongoing rhythm. Results: The model shows a robust dependence of I-wave properties on phase and power of ongoing rhythms, with the strongest response occurring for TMS at maximal L5 depolarization. The amount of phase-modulation depends on stimulation intensity, with stronger modulation for lower intensity. Conclusion: The model predicts that responses to TMS are highly variable for low stimulation intensities if ongoing brain rhythms are not taken into account. Closed-loop TMS-EEG holds promise for obtaining more reliable TMS effects.
topic TMS
I-waves
Computational modeling
Phase-dependent stimulation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X18300937
work_keys_str_mv AT natalieschaworonkow ongoingbrainrhythmsshapeiwavepropertiesinacomputationalmodel
AT jochentriesch ongoingbrainrhythmsshapeiwavepropertiesinacomputationalmodel
_version_ 1724214131686375424