Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational model
Background: Responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are notoriously variable. Previous studies have observed a dependence of TMS-induced responses on ongoing brain activity, for instance sensorimotor rhythms. This suggests an opportunity for the development of more effective stimulation...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Brain Stimulation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X18300937 |
id |
doaj-b5bed279d14e4b5abe74eebe7f3a414d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b5bed279d14e4b5abe74eebe7f3a414d2021-03-19T07:11:55ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2018-07-01114828838Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational modelNatalie Schaworonkow0Jochen Triesch1Corresponding author.; Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyFrankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyBackground: Responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are notoriously variable. Previous studies have observed a dependence of TMS-induced responses on ongoing brain activity, for instance sensorimotor rhythms. This suggests an opportunity for the development of more effective stimulation protocols through closed-loop TMS-EEG. However, it is not yet clear how features of ongoing activity affect the responses of cortical circuits to TMS. Objective/Hypothesis: Here we investigate the dependence of TMS-responses on power and phase of ongoing oscillatory activity in a computational model of TMS-induced I-waves. Methods: The model comprises populations of cortical layer 2/3 (L2/3) neurons and a population of cortical layer 5 (L5) neurons and generates I-waves in response to TMS. Oscillatory input to the L2/3 neurons induces rhythmic fluctuations in activity of L5 neurons. TMS pulses are simulated at different phases and amplitudes of the ongoing rhythm. Results: The model shows a robust dependence of I-wave properties on phase and power of ongoing rhythms, with the strongest response occurring for TMS at maximal L5 depolarization. The amount of phase-modulation depends on stimulation intensity, with stronger modulation for lower intensity. Conclusion: The model predicts that responses to TMS are highly variable for low stimulation intensities if ongoing brain rhythms are not taken into account. Closed-loop TMS-EEG holds promise for obtaining more reliable TMS effects.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X18300937TMSI-wavesComputational modelingPhase-dependent stimulation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Natalie Schaworonkow Jochen Triesch |
spellingShingle |
Natalie Schaworonkow Jochen Triesch Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational model Brain Stimulation TMS I-waves Computational modeling Phase-dependent stimulation |
author_facet |
Natalie Schaworonkow Jochen Triesch |
author_sort |
Natalie Schaworonkow |
title |
Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational model |
title_short |
Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational model |
title_full |
Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational model |
title_fullStr |
Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational model |
title_sort |
ongoing brain rhythms shape i-wave properties in a computational model |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Brain Stimulation |
issn |
1935-861X |
publishDate |
2018-07-01 |
description |
Background: Responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are notoriously variable. Previous studies have observed a dependence of TMS-induced responses on ongoing brain activity, for instance sensorimotor rhythms. This suggests an opportunity for the development of more effective stimulation protocols through closed-loop TMS-EEG. However, it is not yet clear how features of ongoing activity affect the responses of cortical circuits to TMS. Objective/Hypothesis: Here we investigate the dependence of TMS-responses on power and phase of ongoing oscillatory activity in a computational model of TMS-induced I-waves. Methods: The model comprises populations of cortical layer 2/3 (L2/3) neurons and a population of cortical layer 5 (L5) neurons and generates I-waves in response to TMS. Oscillatory input to the L2/3 neurons induces rhythmic fluctuations in activity of L5 neurons. TMS pulses are simulated at different phases and amplitudes of the ongoing rhythm. Results: The model shows a robust dependence of I-wave properties on phase and power of ongoing rhythms, with the strongest response occurring for TMS at maximal L5 depolarization. The amount of phase-modulation depends on stimulation intensity, with stronger modulation for lower intensity. Conclusion: The model predicts that responses to TMS are highly variable for low stimulation intensities if ongoing brain rhythms are not taken into account. Closed-loop TMS-EEG holds promise for obtaining more reliable TMS effects. |
topic |
TMS I-waves Computational modeling Phase-dependent stimulation |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X18300937 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT natalieschaworonkow ongoingbrainrhythmsshapeiwavepropertiesinacomputationalmodel AT jochentriesch ongoingbrainrhythmsshapeiwavepropertiesinacomputationalmodel |
_version_ |
1724214131686375424 |