A typology of useful evidence: approaches to increase the practical value of intervention research
Abstract Background Too often, studies of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in preventive, community, and health care are not sufficiently useful to end users (typically practitioners, patients, policymakers, or other researchers). The ways in which intervention studies are conventionally conducte...
Main Authors: | Henna Hasson, Laura Leviton, Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-020-00992-2 |
Similar Items
-
Professionals’ management of the fidelity–adaptation dilemma in the use of evidence-based interventions—an intervention study
by: Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
“Horses for Courses”; Comment on “Translating Evidence Into Healthcare Policy and Practice: Single Versus Multi-Faceted Implementation Strategies – Is There a Simple Answer to a Complex Question?”
by: Joyce E. Wilkinson, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01) -
Understanding the value of adhering to or adapting evidence-based interventions: a study protocol of a discrete choice experiment
by: Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
How can evidence-based interventions give the best value for users in social services? Balance between adherence and adaptations: a study protocol
by: Henna Hasson, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Adapting evidence-informed complex population health interventions for new contexts: a systematic review of guidance
by: A. Movsisyan, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)