Systemic Illiquidity Noise-Based Measure—A Solution for Systemic Liquidity Monitoring in Frontier and Emerging Markets

The paper presents an alternative approach to measuring systemic illiquidity applicable to countries with frontier and emerging financial markets, where other existing methods are not applicable. We develop a novel Systemic Illiquidity Noise (SIN)-based measure, using the Nelson–Siegel–Svensson meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ewa Dziwok, Marta A. Karaś
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Risks
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/7/124
id doaj-b5a2b15d12454363b4d477d4be4a9d8d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b5a2b15d12454363b4d477d4be4a9d8d2021-07-23T14:04:56ZengMDPI AGRisks2227-90912021-07-01912412410.3390/risks9070124Systemic Illiquidity Noise-Based Measure—A Solution for Systemic Liquidity Monitoring in Frontier and Emerging MarketsEwa Dziwok0Marta A. Karaś1Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Economics in Katowice, 40-287 Katowice, PolandDepartment of Financial Investments and Risk Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wrocław, PolandThe paper presents an alternative approach to measuring systemic illiquidity applicable to countries with frontier and emerging financial markets, where other existing methods are not applicable. We develop a novel Systemic Illiquidity Noise (SIN)-based measure, using the Nelson–Siegel–Svensson methodology in which we utilize the curve-fitting error as an indicator of financial system illiquidity. We empirically apply our method to a set of 10 divergent Central and Eastern Europe countries—Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia—in the period of 2006–2020. The results show three periods of increased risk in the sample period: the global financial crisis, the European public debt crisis, and the COVID-19 pandemic. They also allow us to identify three divergent sets of countries with different systemic liquidity risk characteristics. The analysis also illustrates the impact of the introduction of the euro on systemic illiquidity risk. The proposed methodology may be of consequence for financial system regulators and macroprudential bodies: it allows for contemporaneous monitoring of discussed risk at a minimal cost using well-known models and easily accessible data.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/7/124systemic risksystemic illiquidityliquidity crisisparametric modelsquantitative methodsemerging markets
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ewa Dziwok
Marta A. Karaś
spellingShingle Ewa Dziwok
Marta A. Karaś
Systemic Illiquidity Noise-Based Measure—A Solution for Systemic Liquidity Monitoring in Frontier and Emerging Markets
Risks
systemic risk
systemic illiquidity
liquidity crisis
parametric models
quantitative methods
emerging markets
author_facet Ewa Dziwok
Marta A. Karaś
author_sort Ewa Dziwok
title Systemic Illiquidity Noise-Based Measure—A Solution for Systemic Liquidity Monitoring in Frontier and Emerging Markets
title_short Systemic Illiquidity Noise-Based Measure—A Solution for Systemic Liquidity Monitoring in Frontier and Emerging Markets
title_full Systemic Illiquidity Noise-Based Measure—A Solution for Systemic Liquidity Monitoring in Frontier and Emerging Markets
title_fullStr Systemic Illiquidity Noise-Based Measure—A Solution for Systemic Liquidity Monitoring in Frontier and Emerging Markets
title_full_unstemmed Systemic Illiquidity Noise-Based Measure—A Solution for Systemic Liquidity Monitoring in Frontier and Emerging Markets
title_sort systemic illiquidity noise-based measure—a solution for systemic liquidity monitoring in frontier and emerging markets
publisher MDPI AG
series Risks
issn 2227-9091
publishDate 2021-07-01
description The paper presents an alternative approach to measuring systemic illiquidity applicable to countries with frontier and emerging financial markets, where other existing methods are not applicable. We develop a novel Systemic Illiquidity Noise (SIN)-based measure, using the Nelson–Siegel–Svensson methodology in which we utilize the curve-fitting error as an indicator of financial system illiquidity. We empirically apply our method to a set of 10 divergent Central and Eastern Europe countries—Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia—in the period of 2006–2020. The results show three periods of increased risk in the sample period: the global financial crisis, the European public debt crisis, and the COVID-19 pandemic. They also allow us to identify three divergent sets of countries with different systemic liquidity risk characteristics. The analysis also illustrates the impact of the introduction of the euro on systemic illiquidity risk. The proposed methodology may be of consequence for financial system regulators and macroprudential bodies: it allows for contemporaneous monitoring of discussed risk at a minimal cost using well-known models and easily accessible data.
topic systemic risk
systemic illiquidity
liquidity crisis
parametric models
quantitative methods
emerging markets
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/7/124
work_keys_str_mv AT ewadziwok systemicilliquiditynoisebasedmeasureasolutionforsystemicliquiditymonitoringinfrontierandemergingmarkets
AT martaakaras systemicilliquiditynoisebasedmeasureasolutionforsystemicliquiditymonitoringinfrontierandemergingmarkets
_version_ 1721286016789118976