The comparison of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta analysis

Objective To compare the re-intervention rates of myomectomy, uterine artery embolization (UAE) and magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for uterine fibroids (UFs) in different follow-up time. Methods Two investigators searched PubMed for clinical studies published in Englis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fan Xu, Lihong Deng, Lijun Zhang, Huiquan Hu, Qiuling Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-09-01
Series:International Journal of Hyperthermia
Subjects:
uae
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1933216
id doaj-b5a0e7f105594fa880ee8c1d6a0cea5a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b5a0e7f105594fa880ee8c1d6a0cea5a2021-08-24T14:40:57ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Hyperthermia0265-67361464-51572021-09-01382242910.1080/02656736.2021.19332161933216The comparison of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta analysisFan Xu0Lihong Deng1Lijun Zhang2Huiquan Hu3Qiuling Shi4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical UniversityState Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical UniversityState Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical UniversityObjective To compare the re-intervention rates of myomectomy, uterine artery embolization (UAE) and magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for uterine fibroids (UFs) in different follow-up time. Methods Two investigators searched PubMed for clinical studies published in English from 1 Jan 2000 to 31 Dec 2020, and independently examined the paper to select qualified studies, extracted relevant information and assessed the risk of bias. Meanwhile, a meta-analysis of 31 studies containing totally 42103 patients was conducted to compare the re-intervention rate of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS. Results In the meta-analysis of 42103 patients, the 12-month re-intervention rates of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS for UFs were 0.06 (95%CI, 0.01–0.11), 0.07 (95%CI, 0.06–0.09), and 0.12 (95%CI, 0.04–0.20) respectively. The 24-month re-intervention rates were 0.10 (95%CI, 0.04–0.16), 0.08 (95%CI, 0.01–0.17), and 0.14 (95%CI, 0.07–0.21) respectively. The 36-month re-intervention rates were 0.09 (95%CI, 0.05–0.13), 0.14 (95%CI, 0.05–0.23), and 0.22 (95%CI, 0.11–0.32) respectively. Additionally, the 60-month re-intervention rates were 0.19 (95%CI, 0.15–0.24), 0.21 (95%CI, 0.17–0.25), and 0.49 (95%CI, 0.21–0.77) respectively. Conclusions The myomectomy has the lowest re-intervention rate of the three regimens in short time and long time while the MRgFUS has the highest. The rate of MRgFUS increased rapidly in the 60th month after the treatment.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1933216uterine fibroidsmyomectomyuaemrgfusre-intervention
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fan Xu
Lihong Deng
Lijun Zhang
Huiquan Hu
Qiuling Shi
spellingShingle Fan Xu
Lihong Deng
Lijun Zhang
Huiquan Hu
Qiuling Shi
The comparison of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta analysis
International Journal of Hyperthermia
uterine fibroids
myomectomy
uae
mrgfus
re-intervention
author_facet Fan Xu
Lihong Deng
Lijun Zhang
Huiquan Hu
Qiuling Shi
author_sort Fan Xu
title The comparison of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta analysis
title_short The comparison of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta analysis
title_full The comparison of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta analysis
title_fullStr The comparison of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta analysis
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta analysis
title_sort comparison of myomectomy, uae and mrgfus in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta analysis
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series International Journal of Hyperthermia
issn 0265-6736
1464-5157
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Objective To compare the re-intervention rates of myomectomy, uterine artery embolization (UAE) and magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for uterine fibroids (UFs) in different follow-up time. Methods Two investigators searched PubMed for clinical studies published in English from 1 Jan 2000 to 31 Dec 2020, and independently examined the paper to select qualified studies, extracted relevant information and assessed the risk of bias. Meanwhile, a meta-analysis of 31 studies containing totally 42103 patients was conducted to compare the re-intervention rate of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS. Results In the meta-analysis of 42103 patients, the 12-month re-intervention rates of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS for UFs were 0.06 (95%CI, 0.01–0.11), 0.07 (95%CI, 0.06–0.09), and 0.12 (95%CI, 0.04–0.20) respectively. The 24-month re-intervention rates were 0.10 (95%CI, 0.04–0.16), 0.08 (95%CI, 0.01–0.17), and 0.14 (95%CI, 0.07–0.21) respectively. The 36-month re-intervention rates were 0.09 (95%CI, 0.05–0.13), 0.14 (95%CI, 0.05–0.23), and 0.22 (95%CI, 0.11–0.32) respectively. Additionally, the 60-month re-intervention rates were 0.19 (95%CI, 0.15–0.24), 0.21 (95%CI, 0.17–0.25), and 0.49 (95%CI, 0.21–0.77) respectively. Conclusions The myomectomy has the lowest re-intervention rate of the three regimens in short time and long time while the MRgFUS has the highest. The rate of MRgFUS increased rapidly in the 60th month after the treatment.
topic uterine fibroids
myomectomy
uae
mrgfus
re-intervention
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1933216
work_keys_str_mv AT fanxu thecomparisonofmyomectomyuaeandmrgfusinthetreatmentofuterinefibroidsametaanalysis
AT lihongdeng thecomparisonofmyomectomyuaeandmrgfusinthetreatmentofuterinefibroidsametaanalysis
AT lijunzhang thecomparisonofmyomectomyuaeandmrgfusinthetreatmentofuterinefibroidsametaanalysis
AT huiquanhu thecomparisonofmyomectomyuaeandmrgfusinthetreatmentofuterinefibroidsametaanalysis
AT qiulingshi thecomparisonofmyomectomyuaeandmrgfusinthetreatmentofuterinefibroidsametaanalysis
AT fanxu comparisonofmyomectomyuaeandmrgfusinthetreatmentofuterinefibroidsametaanalysis
AT lihongdeng comparisonofmyomectomyuaeandmrgfusinthetreatmentofuterinefibroidsametaanalysis
AT lijunzhang comparisonofmyomectomyuaeandmrgfusinthetreatmentofuterinefibroidsametaanalysis
AT huiquanhu comparisonofmyomectomyuaeandmrgfusinthetreatmentofuterinefibroidsametaanalysis
AT qiulingshi comparisonofmyomectomyuaeandmrgfusinthetreatmentofuterinefibroidsametaanalysis
_version_ 1721197470706302976