Einstein’s “true” discontinuity.With an application to Zeno

The question whether quantum discontinuity can or cannot provide an answer to Zeno’s Paradoxes is reopened. It is observed that what is usually understood by the term “discontinuity”, namely, Einstein’s conception of the photon as described by himself and all others, is unsuitable to the task becaus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Constantin Antonopoulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Basque Country 2009-11-01
Series:THEORIA : an International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science
Online Access:http://www.ehu.es/ojs/index.php/THEORIA/article/view/10511
id doaj-b5967ba621364a21beb0113de4cfb752
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b5967ba621364a21beb0113de4cfb7522020-11-25T00:32:11ZengUniversity of the Basque CountryTHEORIA : an International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science0495-45482171-679X2009-11-0123333934910.1387/theoria.105118383Einstein’s “true” discontinuity.With an application to ZenoConstantin AntonopoulosThe question whether quantum discontinuity can or cannot provide an answer to Zeno’s Paradoxes is reopened. It is observed that what is usually understood by the term “discontinuity”, namely, Einstein’s conception of the photon as described by himself and all others, is unsuitable to the task because, essentially,it reduces to the trivial ‘discontinuity’ of objects scattered in space. By contrast, quantization of energy levels, which are not in space but can only alternate in time, provide the right sort of discontinuity required. Discrete quantized orbits, corresponding to eigen-frequencies, are irreducible, and nothing is allowed to stand in-between them in satisfaction of the quantum postulate, furnishing the requisite, and so far missing, immediate nextness of a point to a certain other. In this way, Zeno’s Runner need not postpone his first step indefinitely, always waiting upon an infinity of preceding steps, before it can be taken. There is now a point that is next to a point and so a step on that point, which is the first step. It follows that, if one kind of discontinuity, Einstein’s, is incapable of offerring an answer to Zeno, while another kind can, the two are discrepant. One of them, the former, is not a kind of discontinuity properly so called at all, though evidently the consequence of one.http://www.ehu.es/ojs/index.php/THEORIA/article/view/10511
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Constantin Antonopoulos
spellingShingle Constantin Antonopoulos
Einstein’s “true” discontinuity.With an application to Zeno
THEORIA : an International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science
author_facet Constantin Antonopoulos
author_sort Constantin Antonopoulos
title Einstein’s “true” discontinuity.With an application to Zeno
title_short Einstein’s “true” discontinuity.With an application to Zeno
title_full Einstein’s “true” discontinuity.With an application to Zeno
title_fullStr Einstein’s “true” discontinuity.With an application to Zeno
title_full_unstemmed Einstein’s “true” discontinuity.With an application to Zeno
title_sort einstein’s “true” discontinuity.with an application to zeno
publisher University of the Basque Country
series THEORIA : an International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science
issn 0495-4548
2171-679X
publishDate 2009-11-01
description The question whether quantum discontinuity can or cannot provide an answer to Zeno’s Paradoxes is reopened. It is observed that what is usually understood by the term “discontinuity”, namely, Einstein’s conception of the photon as described by himself and all others, is unsuitable to the task because, essentially,it reduces to the trivial ‘discontinuity’ of objects scattered in space. By contrast, quantization of energy levels, which are not in space but can only alternate in time, provide the right sort of discontinuity required. Discrete quantized orbits, corresponding to eigen-frequencies, are irreducible, and nothing is allowed to stand in-between them in satisfaction of the quantum postulate, furnishing the requisite, and so far missing, immediate nextness of a point to a certain other. In this way, Zeno’s Runner need not postpone his first step indefinitely, always waiting upon an infinity of preceding steps, before it can be taken. There is now a point that is next to a point and so a step on that point, which is the first step. It follows that, if one kind of discontinuity, Einstein’s, is incapable of offerring an answer to Zeno, while another kind can, the two are discrepant. One of them, the former, is not a kind of discontinuity properly so called at all, though evidently the consequence of one.
url http://www.ehu.es/ojs/index.php/THEORIA/article/view/10511
work_keys_str_mv AT constantinantonopoulos einsteinstruediscontinuitywithanapplicationtozeno
_version_ 1725320412893544448