Evaluating alignment and variant-calling software for mutation identification in C. elegans by whole-genome sequencing.
Whole-genome sequencing is a powerful tool for analyzing genetic variation on a global scale. One particularly useful application is the identification of mutations obtained by classical phenotypic screens in model species. Sequence data from the mutant strain is aligned to the reference genome, and...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5363872?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-b59222f36f484807bfb3248f0b6fbbc8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b59222f36f484807bfb3248f0b6fbbc82020-11-25T02:23:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01123e017444610.1371/journal.pone.0174446Evaluating alignment and variant-calling software for mutation identification in C. elegans by whole-genome sequencing.Harold E SmithSijung YunWhole-genome sequencing is a powerful tool for analyzing genetic variation on a global scale. One particularly useful application is the identification of mutations obtained by classical phenotypic screens in model species. Sequence data from the mutant strain is aligned to the reference genome, and then variants are called to generate a list of candidate alleles. A number of software pipelines for mutation identification have been targeted to C. elegans, with particular emphasis on ease of use, incorporation of mapping strain data, subtraction of background variants, and similar criteria. Although success is predicated upon the sensitive and accurate detection of candidate alleles, relatively little effort has been invested in evaluating the underlying software components that are required for mutation identification. Therefore, we have benchmarked a number of commonly used tools for sequence alignment and variant calling, in all pair-wise combinations, against both simulated and actual datasets. We compared the accuracy of those pipelines for mutation identification in C. elegans, and found that the combination of BBMap for alignment plus FreeBayes for variant calling offers the most robust performance.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5363872?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Harold E Smith Sijung Yun |
spellingShingle |
Harold E Smith Sijung Yun Evaluating alignment and variant-calling software for mutation identification in C. elegans by whole-genome sequencing. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Harold E Smith Sijung Yun |
author_sort |
Harold E Smith |
title |
Evaluating alignment and variant-calling software for mutation identification in C. elegans by whole-genome sequencing. |
title_short |
Evaluating alignment and variant-calling software for mutation identification in C. elegans by whole-genome sequencing. |
title_full |
Evaluating alignment and variant-calling software for mutation identification in C. elegans by whole-genome sequencing. |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating alignment and variant-calling software for mutation identification in C. elegans by whole-genome sequencing. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating alignment and variant-calling software for mutation identification in C. elegans by whole-genome sequencing. |
title_sort |
evaluating alignment and variant-calling software for mutation identification in c. elegans by whole-genome sequencing. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
Whole-genome sequencing is a powerful tool for analyzing genetic variation on a global scale. One particularly useful application is the identification of mutations obtained by classical phenotypic screens in model species. Sequence data from the mutant strain is aligned to the reference genome, and then variants are called to generate a list of candidate alleles. A number of software pipelines for mutation identification have been targeted to C. elegans, with particular emphasis on ease of use, incorporation of mapping strain data, subtraction of background variants, and similar criteria. Although success is predicated upon the sensitive and accurate detection of candidate alleles, relatively little effort has been invested in evaluating the underlying software components that are required for mutation identification. Therefore, we have benchmarked a number of commonly used tools for sequence alignment and variant calling, in all pair-wise combinations, against both simulated and actual datasets. We compared the accuracy of those pipelines for mutation identification in C. elegans, and found that the combination of BBMap for alignment plus FreeBayes for variant calling offers the most robust performance. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5363872?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT haroldesmith evaluatingalignmentandvariantcallingsoftwareformutationidentificationincelegansbywholegenomesequencing AT sijungyun evaluatingalignmentandvariantcallingsoftwareformutationidentificationincelegansbywholegenomesequencing |
_version_ |
1724859509524922368 |