Local perturbations do not affect stability of laboratory fruitfly metapopulations.

A large number of theoretical studies predict that the dynamics of spatially structured populations (metapopulations) can be altered by constant perturbations to local population size. However, these studies presume large metapopulations inhabiting noise-free, zero-extinction environments, and their...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sutirth Dey, Amitabh Joshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2007-02-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1794186?pdf=render
id doaj-b56b92978af44cafb4310f3e17db951f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b56b92978af44cafb4310f3e17db951f2020-11-25T00:26:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032007-02-0122e23310.1371/journal.pone.0000233Local perturbations do not affect stability of laboratory fruitfly metapopulations.Sutirth DeyAmitabh JoshiA large number of theoretical studies predict that the dynamics of spatially structured populations (metapopulations) can be altered by constant perturbations to local population size. However, these studies presume large metapopulations inhabiting noise-free, zero-extinction environments, and their predictions have never been empirically verified.Here we report an empirical study on the effects of localized perturbations on global dynamics and stability, using fruitfly metapopulations in the laboratory. We find that constant addition of individuals to a particular subpopulation in every generation stabilizes that subpopulation locally, but does not have any detectable effect on the dynamics and stability of the metapopulation. Simulations of our experimental system using a simple but widely applicable model of population dynamics were able to recover the empirical findings, indicating the generality of our results. We then simulated the possible consequences of perturbing more subpopulations, increasing the strength of perturbations, and varying the rate of migration, but found that none of these conditions were expected to alter the outcomes of our experiments. Finally, we show that our main results are robust to the presence of local extinctions in the metapopulation.Our study shows that localized perturbations are unlikely to affect the dynamics of real metapopulations, a finding that has cautionary implications for ecologists and conservation biologists faced with the problem of stabilizing unstable metapopulations in nature.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1794186?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sutirth Dey
Amitabh Joshi
spellingShingle Sutirth Dey
Amitabh Joshi
Local perturbations do not affect stability of laboratory fruitfly metapopulations.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Sutirth Dey
Amitabh Joshi
author_sort Sutirth Dey
title Local perturbations do not affect stability of laboratory fruitfly metapopulations.
title_short Local perturbations do not affect stability of laboratory fruitfly metapopulations.
title_full Local perturbations do not affect stability of laboratory fruitfly metapopulations.
title_fullStr Local perturbations do not affect stability of laboratory fruitfly metapopulations.
title_full_unstemmed Local perturbations do not affect stability of laboratory fruitfly metapopulations.
title_sort local perturbations do not affect stability of laboratory fruitfly metapopulations.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2007-02-01
description A large number of theoretical studies predict that the dynamics of spatially structured populations (metapopulations) can be altered by constant perturbations to local population size. However, these studies presume large metapopulations inhabiting noise-free, zero-extinction environments, and their predictions have never been empirically verified.Here we report an empirical study on the effects of localized perturbations on global dynamics and stability, using fruitfly metapopulations in the laboratory. We find that constant addition of individuals to a particular subpopulation in every generation stabilizes that subpopulation locally, but does not have any detectable effect on the dynamics and stability of the metapopulation. Simulations of our experimental system using a simple but widely applicable model of population dynamics were able to recover the empirical findings, indicating the generality of our results. We then simulated the possible consequences of perturbing more subpopulations, increasing the strength of perturbations, and varying the rate of migration, but found that none of these conditions were expected to alter the outcomes of our experiments. Finally, we show that our main results are robust to the presence of local extinctions in the metapopulation.Our study shows that localized perturbations are unlikely to affect the dynamics of real metapopulations, a finding that has cautionary implications for ecologists and conservation biologists faced with the problem of stabilizing unstable metapopulations in nature.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC1794186?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sutirthdey localperturbationsdonotaffectstabilityoflaboratoryfruitflymetapopulations
AT amitabhjoshi localperturbationsdonotaffectstabilityoflaboratoryfruitflymetapopulations
_version_ 1725342529188003840