Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer

Abstract Background Imprinted genes are regulated by DNA methylation at imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions (iDMRs). Abnormal expression of imprinted genes is implicated in imprinting disorders and tumors. In colorectal cancer (CRC), methylation and imprinting status of the IGF2/...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hidenori Hidaka, Ken Higashimoto, Saori Aoki, Hiroyuki Mishima, Chisa Hayashida, Toshiyuki Maeda, Yasuo Koga, Hitomi Yatsuki, Keiichiro Joh, Hirokazu Noshiro, Ryuichi Iwakiri, Atsushi Kawaguchi, Koh-ichiro Yoshiura, Kazuma Fujimoto, Hidenobu Soejima
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-12-01
Series:Clinical Epigenetics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13148-018-0578-9
id doaj-b5620d1192804e999693e61aa633f586
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hidenori Hidaka
Ken Higashimoto
Saori Aoki
Hiroyuki Mishima
Chisa Hayashida
Toshiyuki Maeda
Yasuo Koga
Hitomi Yatsuki
Keiichiro Joh
Hirokazu Noshiro
Ryuichi Iwakiri
Atsushi Kawaguchi
Koh-ichiro Yoshiura
Kazuma Fujimoto
Hidenobu Soejima
spellingShingle Hidenori Hidaka
Ken Higashimoto
Saori Aoki
Hiroyuki Mishima
Chisa Hayashida
Toshiyuki Maeda
Yasuo Koga
Hitomi Yatsuki
Keiichiro Joh
Hirokazu Noshiro
Ryuichi Iwakiri
Atsushi Kawaguchi
Koh-ichiro Yoshiura
Kazuma Fujimoto
Hidenobu Soejima
Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer
Clinical Epigenetics
Genomic imprinting
DNA methylation
iDMR
CIMP
BRAF mutation
KRAS mutation
author_facet Hidenori Hidaka
Ken Higashimoto
Saori Aoki
Hiroyuki Mishima
Chisa Hayashida
Toshiyuki Maeda
Yasuo Koga
Hitomi Yatsuki
Keiichiro Joh
Hirokazu Noshiro
Ryuichi Iwakiri
Atsushi Kawaguchi
Koh-ichiro Yoshiura
Kazuma Fujimoto
Hidenobu Soejima
author_sort Hidenori Hidaka
title Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer
title_short Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer
title_full Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer
title_sort comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer
publisher BMC
series Clinical Epigenetics
issn 1868-7075
1868-7083
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Abstract Background Imprinted genes are regulated by DNA methylation at imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions (iDMRs). Abnormal expression of imprinted genes is implicated in imprinting disorders and tumors. In colorectal cancer (CRC), methylation and imprinting status of the IGF2/H19 domain have been studied. However, no comprehensive methylation analysis of iDMRs in CRC has been reported. Furthermore, the relationship between iDMR methylation status and other methylation-related issues, such as CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1) methylation, remains unclear. Results We analyzed the methylation status of 38 iDMRs in 106 CRC patients. We also investigated CIMP, LINE-1 methylation, KRAS and BRAF gene mutations, and loss of imprinting (LOI) of IGF2. We further examined the relationship between these factors and clinicopathological factors. The overall trend in iDMR methylation was towards hypermethylation, and iDMRs could be grouped into three categories: susceptible, resistant, and intermediate-to-aberrant methylation. The susceptible and resistant iDMRs consisted of all types of iDMR (gametic and somatic, maternally and paternally methylated). Hypermethylation of multiple iDMRs (HyMiD)-positive status was statistically associated with CIMP-positive status, but not associated with mutations in the BRAF and KRAS genes. HyMiD-positive status was inversely associated with LINE-1 methylation. Among four iDMRs within the IGF2/H19 domain, IGF2-DMR0 hypomethylation occurred most frequently, but was not associated with IGF2 LOI. Finally, we statistically calculated predictive prognostic scores based on aberrant methylation status of three iDMRs. Conclusion In CRC tissues, some iDMRs were susceptible to hypermethylation independent of the type of iDMR and genomic sequence. Although HyMiD-positive status was associated with CIMP-positive status, this was independent of the BRAF and KRAS pathways, which are responsible for CIMP. Since IGF2-DMR0 hypomethylation and aberrant methylation of other iDMRs within the IGF2/H19 domain were not associated with IGF2 LOI, dysfunction of any of the molecular components related to imprinting regulation may be involved in IGF2 LOI. The prognostic score calculated based on aberrant methylation of three iDMRs has potential clinical applications as a prognostic predictor in patients. Further study is required to understand the biological significance of, and mechanisms behind, aberrant methylation of iDMRs and IGF2 LOI in CRCs.
topic Genomic imprinting
DNA methylation
iDMR
CIMP
BRAF mutation
KRAS mutation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13148-018-0578-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hidenorihidaka comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer
AT kenhigashimoto comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer
AT saoriaoki comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer
AT hiroyukimishima comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer
AT chisahayashida comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer
AT toshiyukimaeda comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer
AT yasuokoga comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer
AT hitomiyatsuki comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer
AT keiichirojoh comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer
AT hirokazunoshiro comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer
AT ryuichiiwakiri comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer
AT atsushikawaguchi comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer
AT kohichiroyoshiura comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer
AT kazumafujimoto comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer
AT hidenobusoejima comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer
_version_ 1725127229578412032
spelling doaj-b5620d1192804e999693e61aa633f5862020-11-25T01:22:10ZengBMCClinical Epigenetics1868-70751868-70832018-12-0110111110.1186/s13148-018-0578-9Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancerHidenori Hidaka0Ken Higashimoto1Saori Aoki2Hiroyuki Mishima3Chisa Hayashida4Toshiyuki Maeda5Yasuo Koga6Hitomi Yatsuki7Keiichiro Joh8Hirokazu Noshiro9Ryuichi Iwakiri10Atsushi Kawaguchi11Koh-ichiro Yoshiura12Kazuma Fujimoto13Hidenobu Soejima14Division of Molecular Genetics and Epigenetics, Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Saga UniversityDivision of Molecular Genetics and Epigenetics, Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Saga UniversityDivision of Molecular Genetics and Epigenetics, Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Saga UniversityDepartment of Human Genetics, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesDepartment of Human Genetics, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Saga UniversityDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga UniversityDivision of Molecular Genetics and Epigenetics, Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Saga UniversityDivision of Molecular Genetics and Epigenetics, Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Saga UniversityDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga UniversityDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Faculty of Medicine, Saga UniversitySection of Clinical Cooperation System, Center for Comprehensive Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga UniversityDepartment of Human Genetics, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Faculty of Medicine, Saga UniversityDivision of Molecular Genetics and Epigenetics, Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Saga UniversityAbstract Background Imprinted genes are regulated by DNA methylation at imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions (iDMRs). Abnormal expression of imprinted genes is implicated in imprinting disorders and tumors. In colorectal cancer (CRC), methylation and imprinting status of the IGF2/H19 domain have been studied. However, no comprehensive methylation analysis of iDMRs in CRC has been reported. Furthermore, the relationship between iDMR methylation status and other methylation-related issues, such as CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1) methylation, remains unclear. Results We analyzed the methylation status of 38 iDMRs in 106 CRC patients. We also investigated CIMP, LINE-1 methylation, KRAS and BRAF gene mutations, and loss of imprinting (LOI) of IGF2. We further examined the relationship between these factors and clinicopathological factors. The overall trend in iDMR methylation was towards hypermethylation, and iDMRs could be grouped into three categories: susceptible, resistant, and intermediate-to-aberrant methylation. The susceptible and resistant iDMRs consisted of all types of iDMR (gametic and somatic, maternally and paternally methylated). Hypermethylation of multiple iDMRs (HyMiD)-positive status was statistically associated with CIMP-positive status, but not associated with mutations in the BRAF and KRAS genes. HyMiD-positive status was inversely associated with LINE-1 methylation. Among four iDMRs within the IGF2/H19 domain, IGF2-DMR0 hypomethylation occurred most frequently, but was not associated with IGF2 LOI. Finally, we statistically calculated predictive prognostic scores based on aberrant methylation status of three iDMRs. Conclusion In CRC tissues, some iDMRs were susceptible to hypermethylation independent of the type of iDMR and genomic sequence. Although HyMiD-positive status was associated with CIMP-positive status, this was independent of the BRAF and KRAS pathways, which are responsible for CIMP. Since IGF2-DMR0 hypomethylation and aberrant methylation of other iDMRs within the IGF2/H19 domain were not associated with IGF2 LOI, dysfunction of any of the molecular components related to imprinting regulation may be involved in IGF2 LOI. The prognostic score calculated based on aberrant methylation of three iDMRs has potential clinical applications as a prognostic predictor in patients. Further study is required to understand the biological significance of, and mechanisms behind, aberrant methylation of iDMRs and IGF2 LOI in CRCs.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13148-018-0578-9Genomic imprintingDNA methylationiDMRCIMPBRAF mutationKRAS mutation