Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison of Five Techniques for Postmastectomy Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost

Purpose. To compare five techniques for the postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). Materials and Methods. Twenty patients with left-sided breast cancer were retrospectively selected. Five treatment plans were created for each patient: TomoDirect (TD), unblocked...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Du Tang, Zhan Liang, Fada Guan, Zhen Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9097352
id doaj-b561985b7a4440be91ca3d6455c74170
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b561985b7a4440be91ca3d6455c741702020-11-25T02:06:36ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412020-01-01202010.1155/2020/90973529097352Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison of Five Techniques for Postmastectomy Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated BoostDu Tang0Zhan Liang1Fada Guan2Zhen Yang3Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, ChinaDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USADepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, ChinaPurpose. To compare five techniques for the postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). Materials and Methods. Twenty patients with left-sided breast cancer were retrospectively selected. Five treatment plans were created for each patient: TomoDirect (TD), unblocked helical TomoTherapy (unb-HT), blocked HT (b-HT), hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy (hy-IMRT), and fixed-field IMRT (ff-IMRT). A dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to PTVtotal and 60.2 Gy in 28 fractions to PTVboost were prescribed. The dosimetric parameters for targets and organs at risk (OARs), the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), the second cancer complication probability (SCCP) for OARs, and the treatment efficiency were assessed and compared. Results. TD plans and hy-IMRT plans had similar good dose coverage and homogeneity for both PTVboost and PTVtotal and superior dose sparing for the lungs and heart. The ff-IMRT plans had similar dosimetric results for the target volumes compared with the TD and hy-IMRT plans, but gave a relatively higher NTCP and SCCP for the lungs. The unb-HT plans exhibited the highest OAR mean dose, highest NTCP for the lungs (0.97±1.25‰) and heart (4.58±3.62%), and highest SCCP for the lungs (3.57±0.05%) and contralateral breast (2.75±0.29%) among all techniques. The b-HT plans significantly outperformed unb-HT plans with respect to the sparing of the lungs and heart. This technique also showed the best conformity index (0.73±0.08) for PTVboost and the optimal NTCP for the lungs (0.03±0.03‰) and heart (0.61±0.73%). Concerning the delivery efficiency, the hy-IMRT and ff-IMRT achieved much higher delivery efficiency compared with TomoTherapy plans. Conclusion. Of the five techniques studied, TD and hy-IMRT are considered the preferable options for PMRT with SIB for left-sided breast cancer treatment and can be routinely applied in clinical practice.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9097352
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Du Tang
Zhan Liang
Fada Guan
Zhen Yang
spellingShingle Du Tang
Zhan Liang
Fada Guan
Zhen Yang
Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison of Five Techniques for Postmastectomy Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost
BioMed Research International
author_facet Du Tang
Zhan Liang
Fada Guan
Zhen Yang
author_sort Du Tang
title Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison of Five Techniques for Postmastectomy Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost
title_short Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison of Five Techniques for Postmastectomy Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost
title_full Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison of Five Techniques for Postmastectomy Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost
title_fullStr Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison of Five Techniques for Postmastectomy Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison of Five Techniques for Postmastectomy Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost
title_sort dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of five techniques for postmastectomy radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Purpose. To compare five techniques for the postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). Materials and Methods. Twenty patients with left-sided breast cancer were retrospectively selected. Five treatment plans were created for each patient: TomoDirect (TD), unblocked helical TomoTherapy (unb-HT), blocked HT (b-HT), hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy (hy-IMRT), and fixed-field IMRT (ff-IMRT). A dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to PTVtotal and 60.2 Gy in 28 fractions to PTVboost were prescribed. The dosimetric parameters for targets and organs at risk (OARs), the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), the second cancer complication probability (SCCP) for OARs, and the treatment efficiency were assessed and compared. Results. TD plans and hy-IMRT plans had similar good dose coverage and homogeneity for both PTVboost and PTVtotal and superior dose sparing for the lungs and heart. The ff-IMRT plans had similar dosimetric results for the target volumes compared with the TD and hy-IMRT plans, but gave a relatively higher NTCP and SCCP for the lungs. The unb-HT plans exhibited the highest OAR mean dose, highest NTCP for the lungs (0.97±1.25‰) and heart (4.58±3.62%), and highest SCCP for the lungs (3.57±0.05%) and contralateral breast (2.75±0.29%) among all techniques. The b-HT plans significantly outperformed unb-HT plans with respect to the sparing of the lungs and heart. This technique also showed the best conformity index (0.73±0.08) for PTVboost and the optimal NTCP for the lungs (0.03±0.03‰) and heart (0.61±0.73%). Concerning the delivery efficiency, the hy-IMRT and ff-IMRT achieved much higher delivery efficiency compared with TomoTherapy plans. Conclusion. Of the five techniques studied, TD and hy-IMRT are considered the preferable options for PMRT with SIB for left-sided breast cancer treatment and can be routinely applied in clinical practice.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9097352
work_keys_str_mv AT dutang dosimetricandradiobiologicalcomparisonoffivetechniquesforpostmastectomyradiotherapywithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT zhanliang dosimetricandradiobiologicalcomparisonoffivetechniquesforpostmastectomyradiotherapywithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT fadaguan dosimetricandradiobiologicalcomparisonoffivetechniquesforpostmastectomyradiotherapywithsimultaneousintegratedboost
AT zhenyang dosimetricandradiobiologicalcomparisonoffivetechniquesforpostmastectomyradiotherapywithsimultaneousintegratedboost
_version_ 1715569588043776000