Early versus late hysteroscopic resection after high-intensity focused ultrasound for retained placenta accreta

• Main Authors: Sili He, Min Xue, Jianfa Jiang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
• Series: International Journal of Hyperthermia
• Subjects: placenta accreta; high-intensity focused ultrasound; hysteroscopic resection
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1887943
• ISSN: 0265-6736; 1464-5157

Objective: To compare early and late hysteroscopic resection after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for retained placenta accreta. Methods: This retrospective study included 63 women with retained placenta accreta who were treated with HIFU combined with hysteroscopic resection. They were divided into an early group (n = 40) and a late group (n = 23), depending on the time between the HIFU and the hysteroscopic resection. The number of sessions of hysteroscopy needed, adverse events, menstrual recovery, and reproductive outcomes were compared. Results: The mean largest diameter of the retained placenta accreta was 67.6 ± 14.0 mm and 71.6 ± 23.6 mm in each group (p = .47), respectively. In the early group, the first hysteroscopic procedure was done at a mean interval of 2.7 ± 1.4 days after HIFU ablation, while in the late group, the interval was 34.7 ± 15.0 days (p < .001). The rate of complete resection of placenta residue after one hysteroscopic procedure in the late group was 73.9% (17/23). This was significantly higher than in the early group, where the rate was 45% (p = .03). During the follow-up, there was no difference in menstrual recovery and pregnancy outcomes between the groups. Conclusion: This study was the first to compare the effects and safety of early and late hysteroscopic resection after HIFU for retained placenta accreta. Late hysteroscopic resection seems to increase the rate of complete resection of retained placenta accreta after one hysteroscopic procedure.