A triune community: Fichte’s family law against the background of Kant’s practical philosophy (II)

Based on Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right recently published in Russian for the first time, this article investigates the logic and basic statements of Fichte’s theory on family law. The second part of the study considers Fichte's theory of marriage law as compared to Kant’s legal doctrine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sudakov A.
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University 2015-12-01
Series:Кантовский сборник
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/aab/%D0%A1%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2_17-33.pdf
id doaj-b553818461cb4a81a95a89813cda4675
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b553818461cb4a81a95a89813cda46752020-11-25T00:20:50ZdeuImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityКантовский сборник0207-69182310-37012015-12-01344173310.5922/0207-6918-2015-4-2A triune community: Fichte’s family law against the background of Kant’s practical philosophy (II) Sudakov A. Based on Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right recently published in Russian for the first time, this article investigates the logic and basic statements of Fichte’s theory on family law. The second part of the study considers Fichte's theory of marriage law as compared to Kant’s legal doctrine. Both the union and separation of marriage partners is viewed by Fichte as a phenomenon of the internal life and an element of personal freedom, hence the role of clergy in this field. In Fichte’s theory, special attention is paid to the nature and legal effects of a legitimate divorce interpreted based on his moral anthropology of sexes as a moral fact and a legal status. A divorce, once accomplished in the moral substance, transforms the personal union of family partners into a concubinage, which is seen considered in an essentially non-Kantian way. Against the background of these concepts, the article deals with questions of what the state has to protect and what it is entitled to punish in the domain of marriage. https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/aab/%D0%A1%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2_17-33.pdfmarriagedivorceseparationconcubinagecompulsionlovelegal personalityhonourKantFichte
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sudakov A.
spellingShingle Sudakov A.
A triune community: Fichte’s family law against the background of Kant’s practical philosophy (II)
Кантовский сборник
marriage
divorce
separation
concubinage
compulsion
love
legal personality
honour
Kant
Fichte
author_facet Sudakov A.
author_sort Sudakov A.
title A triune community: Fichte’s family law against the background of Kant’s practical philosophy (II)
title_short A triune community: Fichte’s family law against the background of Kant’s practical philosophy (II)
title_full A triune community: Fichte’s family law against the background of Kant’s practical philosophy (II)
title_fullStr A triune community: Fichte’s family law against the background of Kant’s practical philosophy (II)
title_full_unstemmed A triune community: Fichte’s family law against the background of Kant’s practical philosophy (II)
title_sort triune community: fichte’s family law against the background of kant’s practical philosophy (ii)
publisher Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
series Кантовский сборник
issn 0207-6918
2310-3701
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Based on Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right recently published in Russian for the first time, this article investigates the logic and basic statements of Fichte’s theory on family law. The second part of the study considers Fichte's theory of marriage law as compared to Kant’s legal doctrine. Both the union and separation of marriage partners is viewed by Fichte as a phenomenon of the internal life and an element of personal freedom, hence the role of clergy in this field. In Fichte’s theory, special attention is paid to the nature and legal effects of a legitimate divorce interpreted based on his moral anthropology of sexes as a moral fact and a legal status. A divorce, once accomplished in the moral substance, transforms the personal union of family partners into a concubinage, which is seen considered in an essentially non-Kantian way. Against the background of these concepts, the article deals with questions of what the state has to protect and what it is entitled to punish in the domain of marriage.
topic marriage
divorce
separation
concubinage
compulsion
love
legal personality
honour
Kant
Fichte
url https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/aab/%D0%A1%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2_17-33.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sudakova atriunecommunityfichtesfamilylawagainstthebackgroundofkantspracticalphilosophyii
AT sudakova triunecommunityfichtesfamilylawagainstthebackgroundofkantspracticalphilosophyii
_version_ 1725365603053600768