Cluster Detection Tests in Spatial Epidemiology: A Global Indicator for Performance Assessment.

In cluster detection of disease, the use of local cluster detection tests (CDTs) is current. These methods aim both at locating likely clusters and testing for their statistical significance. New or improved CDTs are regularly proposed to epidemiologists and must be subjected to performance assessme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aline Guttmann, Xinran Li, Fabien Feschet, Jean Gaudart, Jacques Demongeot, Jean-Yves Boire, Lemlih Ouchchane
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4472237?pdf=render
id doaj-b54d50af94e44ab898ed49e3c9a49b43
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b54d50af94e44ab898ed49e3c9a49b432020-11-24T21:23:43ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01106e013059410.1371/journal.pone.0130594Cluster Detection Tests in Spatial Epidemiology: A Global Indicator for Performance Assessment.Aline GuttmannXinran LiFabien FeschetJean GaudartJacques DemongeotJean-Yves BoireLemlih OuchchaneIn cluster detection of disease, the use of local cluster detection tests (CDTs) is current. These methods aim both at locating likely clusters and testing for their statistical significance. New or improved CDTs are regularly proposed to epidemiologists and must be subjected to performance assessment. Because location accuracy has to be considered, performance assessment goes beyond the raw estimation of type I or II errors. As no consensus exists for performance evaluations, heterogeneous methods are used, and therefore studies are rarely comparable. A global indicator of performance, which assesses both spatial accuracy and usual power, would facilitate the exploration of CDTs behaviour and help between-studies comparisons. The Tanimoto coefficient (TC) is a well-known measure of similarity that can assess location accuracy but only for one detected cluster. In a simulation study, performance is measured for many tests. From the TC, we here propose two statistics, the averaged TC and the cumulated TC, as indicators able to provide a global overview of CDTs performance for both usual power and location accuracy. We evidence the properties of these two indicators and the superiority of the cumulated TC to assess performance. We tested these indicators to conduct a systematic spatial assessment displayed through performance maps.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4472237?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aline Guttmann
Xinran Li
Fabien Feschet
Jean Gaudart
Jacques Demongeot
Jean-Yves Boire
Lemlih Ouchchane
spellingShingle Aline Guttmann
Xinran Li
Fabien Feschet
Jean Gaudart
Jacques Demongeot
Jean-Yves Boire
Lemlih Ouchchane
Cluster Detection Tests in Spatial Epidemiology: A Global Indicator for Performance Assessment.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Aline Guttmann
Xinran Li
Fabien Feschet
Jean Gaudart
Jacques Demongeot
Jean-Yves Boire
Lemlih Ouchchane
author_sort Aline Guttmann
title Cluster Detection Tests in Spatial Epidemiology: A Global Indicator for Performance Assessment.
title_short Cluster Detection Tests in Spatial Epidemiology: A Global Indicator for Performance Assessment.
title_full Cluster Detection Tests in Spatial Epidemiology: A Global Indicator for Performance Assessment.
title_fullStr Cluster Detection Tests in Spatial Epidemiology: A Global Indicator for Performance Assessment.
title_full_unstemmed Cluster Detection Tests in Spatial Epidemiology: A Global Indicator for Performance Assessment.
title_sort cluster detection tests in spatial epidemiology: a global indicator for performance assessment.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description In cluster detection of disease, the use of local cluster detection tests (CDTs) is current. These methods aim both at locating likely clusters and testing for their statistical significance. New or improved CDTs are regularly proposed to epidemiologists and must be subjected to performance assessment. Because location accuracy has to be considered, performance assessment goes beyond the raw estimation of type I or II errors. As no consensus exists for performance evaluations, heterogeneous methods are used, and therefore studies are rarely comparable. A global indicator of performance, which assesses both spatial accuracy and usual power, would facilitate the exploration of CDTs behaviour and help between-studies comparisons. The Tanimoto coefficient (TC) is a well-known measure of similarity that can assess location accuracy but only for one detected cluster. In a simulation study, performance is measured for many tests. From the TC, we here propose two statistics, the averaged TC and the cumulated TC, as indicators able to provide a global overview of CDTs performance for both usual power and location accuracy. We evidence the properties of these two indicators and the superiority of the cumulated TC to assess performance. We tested these indicators to conduct a systematic spatial assessment displayed through performance maps.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4472237?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT alineguttmann clusterdetectiontestsinspatialepidemiologyaglobalindicatorforperformanceassessment
AT xinranli clusterdetectiontestsinspatialepidemiologyaglobalindicatorforperformanceassessment
AT fabienfeschet clusterdetectiontestsinspatialepidemiologyaglobalindicatorforperformanceassessment
AT jeangaudart clusterdetectiontestsinspatialepidemiologyaglobalindicatorforperformanceassessment
AT jacquesdemongeot clusterdetectiontestsinspatialepidemiologyaglobalindicatorforperformanceassessment
AT jeanyvesboire clusterdetectiontestsinspatialepidemiologyaglobalindicatorforperformanceassessment
AT lemlihouchchane clusterdetectiontestsinspatialepidemiologyaglobalindicatorforperformanceassessment
_version_ 1725991455166562304