Underlying factors behind the low participation rate in electronic waste recycling

This study aims to understand influential factors for Jakarta’s residents to participate in a formal electronic waste recycling programme. It questions the efficacy of providing facilities to collect electronic waste despite the lack of legislated regulations or policies. Using the goal-framing theo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Siringo, H. Herdiansyah, R.D. Kusumastuti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: GJESM Publisher 2020-04-01
Series:Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.gjesm.net/article_37686_ee1060947420a30acb5e857c61c2a433.pdf
id doaj-b5375b6dcaef4a7bbf5cf39f4e1dcf61
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b5375b6dcaef4a7bbf5cf39f4e1dcf612021-02-02T08:20:44ZengGJESM PublisherGlobal Journal of Environmental Science and Management2383-35722383-38662020-04-016220321410.22034/gjesm.2020.02.0637686Underlying factors behind the low participation rate in electronic waste recyclingR. Siringo0H. Herdiansyah1R.D. Kusumastuti2School of Environmental Science, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaSchool of Environmental Science, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IndonesiaDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, IndonesiaThis study aims to understand influential factors for Jakarta’s residents to participate in a formal electronic waste recycling programme. It questions the efficacy of providing facilities to collect electronic waste despite the lack of legislated regulations or policies. Using the goal-framing theory as a foundation, a survey conducted on 208 respondents in 2018 revealed that selling obsolete electronic devices to peddlers or retaining them at home were standard practices in society, and only 2% of respondents recycled their electronic waste at formal facilities. The results show that electronic waste recycling intention correlates highest with information and convenience, 0.521 and 0.411, respectively. While knowledge has the least correlative value with attitude and intention, that is 0.204 and 0.240.  It clarifies that the normative goal is weaker than hedonic and gain goals. Respondents had enough awareness about the hazards of electronic waste. However, their behaviour did not exhibit it. It is imperative to lessen the gap between normative and hedonic goals by campaigning continuously and place the facilities at easily accessible locations to increase recycling participation. Furthermore, collecting electronic waste requires a collaboration between the government and electronics businesses, and must be supported by a legal framework.https://www.gjesm.net/article_37686_ee1060947420a30acb5e857c61c2a433.pdfdrop-off facilitiese-waste collectione-waste managementindonesiapro-environmental behaviour
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R. Siringo
H. Herdiansyah
R.D. Kusumastuti
spellingShingle R. Siringo
H. Herdiansyah
R.D. Kusumastuti
Underlying factors behind the low participation rate in electronic waste recycling
Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management
drop-off facilities
e-waste collection
e-waste management
indonesia
pro-environmental behaviour
author_facet R. Siringo
H. Herdiansyah
R.D. Kusumastuti
author_sort R. Siringo
title Underlying factors behind the low participation rate in electronic waste recycling
title_short Underlying factors behind the low participation rate in electronic waste recycling
title_full Underlying factors behind the low participation rate in electronic waste recycling
title_fullStr Underlying factors behind the low participation rate in electronic waste recycling
title_full_unstemmed Underlying factors behind the low participation rate in electronic waste recycling
title_sort underlying factors behind the low participation rate in electronic waste recycling
publisher GJESM Publisher
series Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management
issn 2383-3572
2383-3866
publishDate 2020-04-01
description This study aims to understand influential factors for Jakarta’s residents to participate in a formal electronic waste recycling programme. It questions the efficacy of providing facilities to collect electronic waste despite the lack of legislated regulations or policies. Using the goal-framing theory as a foundation, a survey conducted on 208 respondents in 2018 revealed that selling obsolete electronic devices to peddlers or retaining them at home were standard practices in society, and only 2% of respondents recycled their electronic waste at formal facilities. The results show that electronic waste recycling intention correlates highest with information and convenience, 0.521 and 0.411, respectively. While knowledge has the least correlative value with attitude and intention, that is 0.204 and 0.240.  It clarifies that the normative goal is weaker than hedonic and gain goals. Respondents had enough awareness about the hazards of electronic waste. However, their behaviour did not exhibit it. It is imperative to lessen the gap between normative and hedonic goals by campaigning continuously and place the facilities at easily accessible locations to increase recycling participation. Furthermore, collecting electronic waste requires a collaboration between the government and electronics businesses, and must be supported by a legal framework.
topic drop-off facilities
e-waste collection
e-waste management
indonesia
pro-environmental behaviour
url https://www.gjesm.net/article_37686_ee1060947420a30acb5e857c61c2a433.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rsiringo underlyingfactorsbehindthelowparticipationrateinelectronicwasterecycling
AT hherdiansyah underlyingfactorsbehindthelowparticipationrateinelectronicwasterecycling
AT rdkusumastuti underlyingfactorsbehindthelowparticipationrateinelectronicwasterecycling
_version_ 1724297288704065536