Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T) Therapy for Hematologic and Solid Malignancies: Efficacy and Safety—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Chimeric antigen receptors T cells (CAR T) had been used for treating various tumor patients in clinic, and owned an incredible efficacy in part of malignancies. However, CAR T therapy remains controversial due to doubts about its efficacy and safety in the clinical treatment of various malignancies...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Cancers |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/11/1/47 |
id |
doaj-b52e912b15474bd2ba9c22b576d15d6a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b52e912b15474bd2ba9c22b576d15d6a2020-11-25T00:45:52ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942019-01-011114710.3390/cancers11010047cancers11010047Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T) Therapy for Hematologic and Solid Malignancies: Efficacy and Safety—A Systematic Review with Meta-AnalysisWen-Liang Yu0Zi-Chun Hua1The State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Macau Institute for Applied Research in Medicine and Health, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, Macao 999078, ChinaJiangsu Target Pharma Laboratories Inc., Changzhou High-Tech Research Institute of Nanjing University, Changzhou 213164, ChinaChimeric antigen receptors T cells (CAR T) had been used for treating various tumor patients in clinic, and owned an incredible efficacy in part of malignancies. However, CAR T therapy remains controversial due to doubts about its efficacy and safety in the clinical treatment of various malignancies. A total of 997 tumor patients from 52 studies were included in this review. Eligible studies were searched and reviewed from the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang and Clinicaltrials.gov. Then meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were used to investigate the overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), common side effect rate (CSER) and relapse rate (RR) of CAR T therapy for patients in clinical researches, respectively. The results further confirmed that CAR T therapy had a higher response rate for hematologic malignancies. More importantly, CAR T therapy had a higher CSER in patients with hematologic malignancies, and it had a similar RR in patients with different malignancies. Cell cultured without the addition of IL-2 and total administration less than 108 cells were recommended. This study offers a reference for future research regarding the application in solid and hematologic malignancies, side effects and relapse, and even the production processes of CAR T cells.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/11/1/47chimeric antigen receptor T cellresponseside effectrelapsesubgroup analysismeta-analysismeta-regression analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wen-Liang Yu Zi-Chun Hua |
spellingShingle |
Wen-Liang Yu Zi-Chun Hua Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T) Therapy for Hematologic and Solid Malignancies: Efficacy and Safety—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis Cancers chimeric antigen receptor T cell response side effect relapse subgroup analysis meta-analysis meta-regression analysis |
author_facet |
Wen-Liang Yu Zi-Chun Hua |
author_sort |
Wen-Liang Yu |
title |
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T) Therapy for Hematologic and Solid Malignancies: Efficacy and Safety—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_short |
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T) Therapy for Hematologic and Solid Malignancies: Efficacy and Safety—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_full |
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T) Therapy for Hematologic and Solid Malignancies: Efficacy and Safety—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T) Therapy for Hematologic and Solid Malignancies: Efficacy and Safety—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T) Therapy for Hematologic and Solid Malignancies: Efficacy and Safety—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_sort |
chimeric antigen receptor t-cell (car t) therapy for hematologic and solid malignancies: efficacy and safety—a systematic review with meta-analysis |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Cancers |
issn |
2072-6694 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Chimeric antigen receptors T cells (CAR T) had been used for treating various tumor patients in clinic, and owned an incredible efficacy in part of malignancies. However, CAR T therapy remains controversial due to doubts about its efficacy and safety in the clinical treatment of various malignancies. A total of 997 tumor patients from 52 studies were included in this review. Eligible studies were searched and reviewed from the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang and Clinicaltrials.gov. Then meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were used to investigate the overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), common side effect rate (CSER) and relapse rate (RR) of CAR T therapy for patients in clinical researches, respectively. The results further confirmed that CAR T therapy had a higher response rate for hematologic malignancies. More importantly, CAR T therapy had a higher CSER in patients with hematologic malignancies, and it had a similar RR in patients with different malignancies. Cell cultured without the addition of IL-2 and total administration less than 108 cells were recommended. This study offers a reference for future research regarding the application in solid and hematologic malignancies, side effects and relapse, and even the production processes of CAR T cells. |
topic |
chimeric antigen receptor T cell response side effect relapse subgroup analysis meta-analysis meta-regression analysis |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/11/1/47 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wenliangyu chimericantigenreceptortcellcarttherapyforhematologicandsolidmalignanciesefficacyandsafetyasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT zichunhua chimericantigenreceptortcellcarttherapyforhematologicandsolidmalignanciesefficacyandsafetyasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1725268381416816640 |