Unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy

Donald F FarrellEEG and Clinical Neurophysiology Laboratory, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USAPurpose: The purpose of this paper is to report 14 new cases of unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and three new cases of cone-rod dystrophy and to compare the similarities and dissimil...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Donald F Farrell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2009-03-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/unilateral-retinitis-pigmentosa-and-cone-rod-dystrophy-a2971
id doaj-b5255ba5a5b049058ef672c17539e799
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b5255ba5a5b049058ef672c17539e7992020-11-24T22:19:31ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54671177-54832009-03-012009default263270Unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophyDonald F FarrellDonald F FarrellEEG and Clinical Neurophysiology Laboratory, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USAPurpose: The purpose of this paper is to report 14 new cases of unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and three new cases of cone-rod dystrophy and to compare the similarities and dissimilarities to those found in the bilateral forms of these disorders.Methods: A total of 272 cases of retinitis pigmentosa and 167 cases of cone-rod dystrophy were studied by corneal full field electroretinograms and electrooculograms. The student t-test was used to compare categories.Results: The percentage of familial and nonfamilial cases was the same for the bilateral and unilateral forms of the disease. In our series, unilateral retinitis pigmentosa makes up approximately 5% of the total population of retinitis pigmentosa, while unilateral cone-rod dystrophy makes up only about 2% of the total. In the familial forms of unilateral retinitis pigmentosa the most common inheritance pattern was autosomal dominant and all affected relatives had bilateral disease.Conclusion: Unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy appear to be directly related to the more common bilateral forms of these disorders. The genetic mechanisms which account for asymmetric disorders are not currently understood. It may be a different unidentified mutation at a single loci or it is possible that nonlinked mutations in multiple loci account for this unusual disorder.Keywords: unilateral retinitis pigmentosa, unilateral cone-rod dystrophy, nonlinked mutations, correlations, age of onset http://www.dovepress.com/unilateral-retinitis-pigmentosa-and-cone-rod-dystrophy-a2971
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Donald F Farrell
spellingShingle Donald F Farrell
Unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy
Clinical Ophthalmology
author_facet Donald F Farrell
author_sort Donald F Farrell
title Unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy
title_short Unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy
title_full Unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy
title_fullStr Unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy
title_full_unstemmed Unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy
title_sort unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical Ophthalmology
issn 1177-5467
1177-5483
publishDate 2009-03-01
description Donald F FarrellEEG and Clinical Neurophysiology Laboratory, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USAPurpose: The purpose of this paper is to report 14 new cases of unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and three new cases of cone-rod dystrophy and to compare the similarities and dissimilarities to those found in the bilateral forms of these disorders.Methods: A total of 272 cases of retinitis pigmentosa and 167 cases of cone-rod dystrophy were studied by corneal full field electroretinograms and electrooculograms. The student t-test was used to compare categories.Results: The percentage of familial and nonfamilial cases was the same for the bilateral and unilateral forms of the disease. In our series, unilateral retinitis pigmentosa makes up approximately 5% of the total population of retinitis pigmentosa, while unilateral cone-rod dystrophy makes up only about 2% of the total. In the familial forms of unilateral retinitis pigmentosa the most common inheritance pattern was autosomal dominant and all affected relatives had bilateral disease.Conclusion: Unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy appear to be directly related to the more common bilateral forms of these disorders. The genetic mechanisms which account for asymmetric disorders are not currently understood. It may be a different unidentified mutation at a single loci or it is possible that nonlinked mutations in multiple loci account for this unusual disorder.Keywords: unilateral retinitis pigmentosa, unilateral cone-rod dystrophy, nonlinked mutations, correlations, age of onset
url http://www.dovepress.com/unilateral-retinitis-pigmentosa-and-cone-rod-dystrophy-a2971
work_keys_str_mv AT donaldffarrell unilateralretinitispigmentosaandconeroddystrophy
_version_ 1725778763777572864