Spoken and written ellipsis in (and not in) the experience of adult literacy learners

Interference from spoken language can hinder adult learners’ reading, so it is helpful for tutors to be aware of differences between spoken and written syntax. Study of the incidence of ellipsis in two adult learners’ conversational language demonstrates the absence of most forms of coordination an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Margaret Childs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Irish Association for Applied Linguistics 2019-08-01
Series:Teanga: The Journal of the Irish Association for Applied Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.iraal.ie/index.php/teanga/article/view/176
id doaj-b5214cad288a49e5a27d8e0b7450e629
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b5214cad288a49e5a27d8e0b7450e6292020-11-25T01:31:12ZengThe Irish Association for Applied LinguisticsTeanga: The Journal of the Irish Association for Applied Linguistics 0332-205X2565-63252019-08-0121Spoken and written ellipsis in (and not in) the experience of adult literacy learnersMargaret Childs0Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick Interference from spoken language can hinder adult learners’ reading, so it is helpful for tutors to be aware of differences between spoken and written syntax. Study of the incidence of ellipsis in two adult learners’ conversational language demonstrates the absence of most forms of coordination and subordination ellipsis typical of writing, and the frequent omission of subordinators, including the total absence of that relatives from one informant’s corpus. Examples of typically spoken situational ellipsis draw attention to the different locus of reference (situational or textual) in spoken and written ellipsis, and therefore the different strategy of interpretation required in reading. It is also shown that the use and non-use of ellipsis often have communicative functions in the dialogues that reflect linguistic skills rather than sloppiness or incompetence. Implications for tuition are suggested. https://journal.iraal.ie/index.php/teanga/article/view/176Ellipsisadult literacy learnersCorpus Linguistics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Margaret Childs
spellingShingle Margaret Childs
Spoken and written ellipsis in (and not in) the experience of adult literacy learners
Teanga: The Journal of the Irish Association for Applied Linguistics
Ellipsis
adult literacy learners
Corpus Linguistics
author_facet Margaret Childs
author_sort Margaret Childs
title Spoken and written ellipsis in (and not in) the experience of adult literacy learners
title_short Spoken and written ellipsis in (and not in) the experience of adult literacy learners
title_full Spoken and written ellipsis in (and not in) the experience of adult literacy learners
title_fullStr Spoken and written ellipsis in (and not in) the experience of adult literacy learners
title_full_unstemmed Spoken and written ellipsis in (and not in) the experience of adult literacy learners
title_sort spoken and written ellipsis in (and not in) the experience of adult literacy learners
publisher The Irish Association for Applied Linguistics
series Teanga: The Journal of the Irish Association for Applied Linguistics
issn 0332-205X
2565-6325
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Interference from spoken language can hinder adult learners’ reading, so it is helpful for tutors to be aware of differences between spoken and written syntax. Study of the incidence of ellipsis in two adult learners’ conversational language demonstrates the absence of most forms of coordination and subordination ellipsis typical of writing, and the frequent omission of subordinators, including the total absence of that relatives from one informant’s corpus. Examples of typically spoken situational ellipsis draw attention to the different locus of reference (situational or textual) in spoken and written ellipsis, and therefore the different strategy of interpretation required in reading. It is also shown that the use and non-use of ellipsis often have communicative functions in the dialogues that reflect linguistic skills rather than sloppiness or incompetence. Implications for tuition are suggested.
topic Ellipsis
adult literacy learners
Corpus Linguistics
url https://journal.iraal.ie/index.php/teanga/article/view/176
work_keys_str_mv AT margaretchilds spokenandwrittenellipsisinandnotintheexperienceofadultliteracylearners
_version_ 1725088055972331520