Critique of culture in the feminine

The article analyses the inflections of gender upon the Brazilian intellectual field, in its interface with literary and cultural critique, from the 1920's to the 1960's. It focuses on the trajectory of three expressive women who achieved renown as critics of culture, essayists and writers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heloisa Pontes, Thaddeus Gregory Blanchette
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Series:Mana
Subjects:
Online Access:http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-93132008000100003&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-b50d3a0761c6453b8a6ab9f208494509
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b50d3a0761c6453b8a6ab9f2084945092020-11-25T03:13:14ZengUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroMana0104-93131678-49444seS0104-93132008000100003Critique of culture in the feminineHeloisa Pontes0Thaddeus Gregory BlanchetteUnicampThe article analyses the inflections of gender upon the Brazilian intellectual field, in its interface with literary and cultural critique, from the 1920's to the 1960's. It focuses on the trajectory of three expressive women who achieved renown as critics of culture, essayists and writers: Lúcia Miguel Pereira, Patrícia Galvão and Gilda Mello e Souza. The three belong to distinct generations and cover the political spectrum of the time: from Communism to Socialism, for Patrícia Galvão, through the intellectual circles of Catholicism, for Lúcia Miguel Pereira, or else maintaining a certain distance from these issues and establishing an academic intellectual identity, in the case of Gilda de Mello e Souza. When taken as a set and in the context of the constraints that derive from gender relations, they delineate some of the possible fields for the intellectual activity of women at the time. So as to avoid essentializing social markers that only become analytically potent when placed in relationship, the article concludes by a comparison of the intellectual and theatrical fields, in order to contrast career opportunities and the distinct ways of making a "name" for oneself that were available to intellectuals and actresses at the time.http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-93132008000100003&lng=en&tlng=enintellectual fieldcritique of culturegender relationsmodernismtheatrework partnerships
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Heloisa Pontes
Thaddeus Gregory Blanchette
spellingShingle Heloisa Pontes
Thaddeus Gregory Blanchette
Critique of culture in the feminine
Mana
intellectual field
critique of culture
gender relations
modernism
theatre
work partnerships
author_facet Heloisa Pontes
Thaddeus Gregory Blanchette
author_sort Heloisa Pontes
title Critique of culture in the feminine
title_short Critique of culture in the feminine
title_full Critique of culture in the feminine
title_fullStr Critique of culture in the feminine
title_full_unstemmed Critique of culture in the feminine
title_sort critique of culture in the feminine
publisher Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
series Mana
issn 0104-9313
1678-4944
description The article analyses the inflections of gender upon the Brazilian intellectual field, in its interface with literary and cultural critique, from the 1920's to the 1960's. It focuses on the trajectory of three expressive women who achieved renown as critics of culture, essayists and writers: Lúcia Miguel Pereira, Patrícia Galvão and Gilda Mello e Souza. The three belong to distinct generations and cover the political spectrum of the time: from Communism to Socialism, for Patrícia Galvão, through the intellectual circles of Catholicism, for Lúcia Miguel Pereira, or else maintaining a certain distance from these issues and establishing an academic intellectual identity, in the case of Gilda de Mello e Souza. When taken as a set and in the context of the constraints that derive from gender relations, they delineate some of the possible fields for the intellectual activity of women at the time. So as to avoid essentializing social markers that only become analytically potent when placed in relationship, the article concludes by a comparison of the intellectual and theatrical fields, in order to contrast career opportunities and the distinct ways of making a "name" for oneself that were available to intellectuals and actresses at the time.
topic intellectual field
critique of culture
gender relations
modernism
theatre
work partnerships
url http://socialsciences.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-93132008000100003&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT heloisapontes critiqueofcultureinthefeminine
AT thaddeusgregoryblanchette critiqueofcultureinthefeminine
_version_ 1724648034471510016