Multigroup Equivalence Analysis for High-Dimensional Expression Data

Hypothesis tests of equivalence are typically known for their application in bioequivalence studies and acceptance sampling. Their application to gene expression data, in particular high-dimensional gene expression data, has only recently been studied. In this paper, we examine how two multigroup eq...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Celeste Yang, Alfred A. Bartolucci, Xiangqin Cui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-01-01
Series:Cancer Informatics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/CIN.S17304
id doaj-b50b2aa609054819a868af87035c5b01
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b50b2aa609054819a868af87035c5b012020-11-25T03:17:37ZengSAGE PublishingCancer Informatics1176-93512015-01-0114s210.4137/CIN.S17304Multigroup Equivalence Analysis for High-Dimensional Expression DataCeleste Yang0Alfred A. Bartolucci1Xiangqin Cui2BioFire Diagnostics, LLC, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.Department of Biostatistics, Section on Statistical Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Ryals School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, USA.Department of Biostatistics, Section on Statistical Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Ryals School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, USA.Hypothesis tests of equivalence are typically known for their application in bioequivalence studies and acceptance sampling. Their application to gene expression data, in particular high-dimensional gene expression data, has only recently been studied. In this paper, we examine how two multigroup equivalence tests, the F -test and the range test, perform when applied to microarray expression data. We adapted these tests to a well-known equivalence criterion, the difference ratio. Our simulation results showed that both tests can achieve moderate power while controlling the type I error at nominal level for typical expression microarray studies with the benefit of easy-to-interpret equivalence limits. For the range of parameters simulated in this paper, the F -test is more powerful than the range test. However, for comparing three groups, their powers are similar. Finally, the two multigroup tests were applied to a prostate cancer microarray dataset to identify genes whose expression follows a prespecified trajectory across five prostate cancer stages.https://doi.org/10.4137/CIN.S17304
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Celeste Yang
Alfred A. Bartolucci
Xiangqin Cui
spellingShingle Celeste Yang
Alfred A. Bartolucci
Xiangqin Cui
Multigroup Equivalence Analysis for High-Dimensional Expression Data
Cancer Informatics
author_facet Celeste Yang
Alfred A. Bartolucci
Xiangqin Cui
author_sort Celeste Yang
title Multigroup Equivalence Analysis for High-Dimensional Expression Data
title_short Multigroup Equivalence Analysis for High-Dimensional Expression Data
title_full Multigroup Equivalence Analysis for High-Dimensional Expression Data
title_fullStr Multigroup Equivalence Analysis for High-Dimensional Expression Data
title_full_unstemmed Multigroup Equivalence Analysis for High-Dimensional Expression Data
title_sort multigroup equivalence analysis for high-dimensional expression data
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Cancer Informatics
issn 1176-9351
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Hypothesis tests of equivalence are typically known for their application in bioequivalence studies and acceptance sampling. Their application to gene expression data, in particular high-dimensional gene expression data, has only recently been studied. In this paper, we examine how two multigroup equivalence tests, the F -test and the range test, perform when applied to microarray expression data. We adapted these tests to a well-known equivalence criterion, the difference ratio. Our simulation results showed that both tests can achieve moderate power while controlling the type I error at nominal level for typical expression microarray studies with the benefit of easy-to-interpret equivalence limits. For the range of parameters simulated in this paper, the F -test is more powerful than the range test. However, for comparing three groups, their powers are similar. Finally, the two multigroup tests were applied to a prostate cancer microarray dataset to identify genes whose expression follows a prespecified trajectory across five prostate cancer stages.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/CIN.S17304
work_keys_str_mv AT celesteyang multigroupequivalenceanalysisforhighdimensionalexpressiondata
AT alfredabartolucci multigroupequivalenceanalysisforhighdimensionalexpressiondata
AT xiangqincui multigroupequivalenceanalysisforhighdimensionalexpressiondata
_version_ 1724631062700621824