Simplified aerosol modeling for variational data assimilation

We have developed a simplified aerosol model together with its tangent linear and adjoint versions for the ultimate aim of optimizing global aerosol and aerosol precursor emission using variational data assimilation. The model was derived from the general circulation model LMDz; it groups together t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Huneeus, O. Boucher, F. Chevallier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2009-11-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/2/213/2009/gmd-2-213-2009.pdf
id doaj-b503f3615d064291817ff9606bc68788
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b503f3615d064291817ff9606bc687882020-11-24T23:14:56ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032009-11-0122213229Simplified aerosol modeling for variational data assimilationN. HuneeusO. BoucherF. ChevallierWe have developed a simplified aerosol model together with its tangent linear and adjoint versions for the ultimate aim of optimizing global aerosol and aerosol precursor emission using variational data assimilation. The model was derived from the general circulation model LMDz; it groups together the 24 aerosol species simulated in LMDz into 4 species, namely gaseous precursors, fine mode aerosols, coarse mode desert dust and coarse mode sea salt. The emissions have been kept as in the original model. Modifications, however, were introduced in the computation of aerosol optical depth and in the processes of sedimentation, dry and wet deposition and sulphur chemistry to ensure consistency with the new set of species and their composition. <br><br> The simplified model successfully manages to reproduce the main features of the aerosol distribution in LMDz. The largest differences in aerosol load are observed for fine mode aerosols and gaseous precursors. Differences between the original and simplified models are mainly associated to the new deposition and sedimentation velocities consistent with the definition of species in the simplified model and the simplification of the sulphur chemistry. Furthermore, simulated aerosol optical depth remains within the variability of monthly AERONET observations for all aerosol types and all sites throughout most of the year. Largest differences are observed over sites with strong desert dust influence. In terms of the daily aerosol variability, the model is less able to reproduce the observed variability from the AERONET data with larger discrepancies in stations affected by industrial aerosols. The simplified model however, closely follows the daily simulation from LMDz. <br><br> Sensitivity analyses with the tangent linear version show that the simplified sulphur chemistry is the dominant process responsible for the strong non-linearity of the model. http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/2/213/2009/gmd-2-213-2009.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N. Huneeus
O. Boucher
F. Chevallier
spellingShingle N. Huneeus
O. Boucher
F. Chevallier
Simplified aerosol modeling for variational data assimilation
Geoscientific Model Development
author_facet N. Huneeus
O. Boucher
F. Chevallier
author_sort N. Huneeus
title Simplified aerosol modeling for variational data assimilation
title_short Simplified aerosol modeling for variational data assimilation
title_full Simplified aerosol modeling for variational data assimilation
title_fullStr Simplified aerosol modeling for variational data assimilation
title_full_unstemmed Simplified aerosol modeling for variational data assimilation
title_sort simplified aerosol modeling for variational data assimilation
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Geoscientific Model Development
issn 1991-959X
1991-9603
publishDate 2009-11-01
description We have developed a simplified aerosol model together with its tangent linear and adjoint versions for the ultimate aim of optimizing global aerosol and aerosol precursor emission using variational data assimilation. The model was derived from the general circulation model LMDz; it groups together the 24 aerosol species simulated in LMDz into 4 species, namely gaseous precursors, fine mode aerosols, coarse mode desert dust and coarse mode sea salt. The emissions have been kept as in the original model. Modifications, however, were introduced in the computation of aerosol optical depth and in the processes of sedimentation, dry and wet deposition and sulphur chemistry to ensure consistency with the new set of species and their composition. <br><br> The simplified model successfully manages to reproduce the main features of the aerosol distribution in LMDz. The largest differences in aerosol load are observed for fine mode aerosols and gaseous precursors. Differences between the original and simplified models are mainly associated to the new deposition and sedimentation velocities consistent with the definition of species in the simplified model and the simplification of the sulphur chemistry. Furthermore, simulated aerosol optical depth remains within the variability of monthly AERONET observations for all aerosol types and all sites throughout most of the year. Largest differences are observed over sites with strong desert dust influence. In terms of the daily aerosol variability, the model is less able to reproduce the observed variability from the AERONET data with larger discrepancies in stations affected by industrial aerosols. The simplified model however, closely follows the daily simulation from LMDz. <br><br> Sensitivity analyses with the tangent linear version show that the simplified sulphur chemistry is the dominant process responsible for the strong non-linearity of the model.
url http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/2/213/2009/gmd-2-213-2009.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nhuneeus simplifiedaerosolmodelingforvariationaldataassimilation
AT oboucher simplifiedaerosolmodelingforvariationaldataassimilation
AT fchevallier simplifiedaerosolmodelingforvariationaldataassimilation
_version_ 1725592798540857344