Argumentation in Theory and Practice: Gap or Equilibrium?
ABSTRACT: It is not uncommon, in argumentation and in various professions, to diagnose a gap between theory and practice; and in the next step argue that they should be brought into line with each other. But what does this mean? I shall argue that some version of a gap is sound, as it leaves theory...
Main Author: | Tone Kvernbekk |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2012-09-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/3534 |
Similar Items
-
Argumentation in Theory and Practice: Gap or Equilibrium?
by: Tone Kvernbekk
Published: (2012-09-01) -
Johnson, MacIntyre, and the Practice of Argumentation
by: Tone Kvernbekk
Published: (2008-09-01) -
The Abuses of Argument: Understanding Fallacies on Toulmin’s Layout of Argument
by: Andrew Pineau
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Construindo argumentação na sala de aula: a presença do ciclo argumentativo, os indicadores de alfabetização científica e o padrão de toulmin Building up argumentation in classroom: cyclic argumentation, indicators of Scientific Literacy and Toulmin argument pattern
by: Lúcia Helena Sasseron, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01) -
The Examination of the Argumentation Processes of 8th Grade Students in the Context of Mathematical Problems
by: Sare ŞENGÜL, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01)